Racial Profiling and Borders - Assignment Example

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution challenges racial profiling and guarantees the safety of U.S. citizens from unreasonable search and seizure without probable cause (Weitzer and Tuch). Those in the enforcement community opposed to racial profiling term the practice unfortunate if ethnic and racial profiling is considered effective and necessary.

Although the supporters of this practice content that due to socio-economic and demographic factors crime is reported highly in some communities that feel like a minority, and therefore the profiling cannot be avoided, lest the crime persists. Cases law Fundamentally, the case the United States v. The city of Los Angeles, the United States alleged that the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) engaged in the practice of depriving individuals of constitutional rights by using excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, all in violation of 14141 42 U.S.C. 14141. The support of some officers and a number of community groups and individuals, especially being people of colour that attested to have suffered the injustices, formed the basis of the suit against the City defendants.

Thus, in this case, the court should accord the victim (Joe) proper representation in court, instead of supporting the actions of the police officer. The outcome of the case The court on the basis of permissive intervention held that the community interveners had a right to a proposed government decree. Furthermore, it required that the City defendants shall seek declaratory relief from the district court to resolve the issue. The residents should be protected from the police due to their vow to secrecy and thus will not turn each other in for such cases as racial/ethnic discrimination.

Ethical issues despite Joe’s harassment and eventual arrest for “interfering with official police conduct”, the police department overlooks the practice of terming Officer Jones’s actions as well with official duties. Instead of the authorities being objective about the case, their support for racial –profiling is unethical; and furthermore withholds some of Joe’s items. Such injustices affecting not only the foreign-descent citizens, but also other minorities such as the female gender, the physically challenged, and others, should be punishable in a court of law (Shantz).