Nobody downloaded yet

Judicial Review - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
White rabbit: Your Majesty, members of the jury, loyal subjects. and the King. the prisoner at the bar stands accused of enticing Her Majesty, the Queen of Hearts, into a game of croquet, thereby and with malice of forethought, molesting, tormenting, and otherwise annoying our beloved…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.7% of users find it useful
Judicial Review
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Judicial Review"

Download file to see previous pages Who will then protect the ordinary citizen from suffering from the wrath of the angry Queen of Hearts and give them a chance to have their cases reconsidered and to achieve procedural and substantive justice
Our saviour is of course the remedy of Judicial Review which has become more of an eye sore to the Executive in the yester decades as the Judiciary continues to "check and balance" an unruly, highly political executive particularly after the new Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and the not so recent Human Rights Act 1998 which seems to have absorbed in the veins of judicial activism and recent case law with much ease.
This Paper explores the process of judicial review of administrative action in the United Kingdom in the context of its constitutional significance. ...
migration and Terrorism law post 9/11 and 7/7).Although there have been attempts to circumvent the scope and effect of the doctrine of Judicial Review in the past ( Anisminic Ltd. v. Foreign Compensation Commission2) ,the most recent has been the notorious "ouster" clause in the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants) Bill which has provoked an outcry from the human rights lobby and the constitutional law experts. Also significant is the role of the Human Rights Act 1998 which has to some extent resolved the debate whether judicial review should be based on common law or statute.3
Power must be Checked by Power4
The constitutional basis of Judicial review lies in the concept of "checks and balances" where as the actions of the members of the executive will be "checked" by the Judiciary to see whether they have gone beyond their "power" to prevent the arbitrary abuse of power. Traditionally the English approach to a systematisation of judicial review was remedial based and thus similar to the development of the prerogative writs5 which developed as personal requests by an individual to the King for the redressal of a wrong suffered by another individual.6The UK has no separate system of administrative courts (and the concept never found favour with the system either eversince the abolition of infamous prerogative Star Chamber).Thus the present administrative review system of England can be described as a body that combines both a substantive body of law containing grounds of review and a large number of administrative tribunals dealing with statutory appeals from decisions of public bodies.
The subject of judicial review of administrative action thus requires a discussion of the role of the courts in devising and applying constraints to the exercise of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Judicial Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Judicial Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Judicial Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Judicial Review

...?JUDICIAL REVIEW According to Wolfe, “Judicial review is the series of checks and balances within a definite government can be seen most clearly by examining its approach to constitutional interpretation and its manner of exercising judicial review” (10). The traditional meaning of judicial review was illustrated in two instances. First is in Federalist No. 78 and second is in the case of Marbury Vs. Madison (5 U.S. 137). “Laws which are contrary to the Constitution are therefore void because the interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts (Federalist No. 78), because it is emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial government to say what the law is (Marbury Vs. Madison), and because... . Corwin,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Judicial Review

...Judicial review Introduction Judicial review is the law concerning judicial control of the powers, functionsand procedures of administrative bodies. The courts are therefore vested with jurisdiction over proceedings and decisions of tribunals, inferior courts and other bodies performing public functions. It is important to note that this is a public remedy and not a private remedy. ( Dicey 329-333) in his book defines Administrative Law as “the Law denoting that portion of a nation’s legal system which determines the legal status and liabilities of all state officials, which defines rights and liabilities of private individuals in their dealings with...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Authority Judicial Review Jurisdiction

...I. A. The decisions of the IRA are not reviewable. In several cases, it is clear that an ity which is deemed to be wholly private, even if exercising quite wide-ranging powers affecting many people, is not susceptible to the judicial review jurisdiction. In the case of the Jockey Club1, the Football Association2, the imam of a mosque3, Lloyd's of London4, the RSPCA5 and the British Council6, it was held that since these bodies were exercising powers which were not akin to the essentially governmental nature of truly public activity, despite the possible effect that their decisions might have on members of the public. More specifically, in the case of R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers,...
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study

Judicial Review Case Study

...Judicial review is a function of the legality of the lawfulness of administrative decision. It is also a function of the competing demands of administrative decision making. If a public decision is legal then it can remain as such despite the absence of legal guidance, although this legality may be attributable more to luck than to judgment. While regard to the legal constraints might produce better decision making, and so is to be encouraged, for it to become a ground is a challengeable concept and hence appears to have little merit ( R v. Somerset, 1995). Any arbitrary decisions for which a public official cannot be held accountable represent important and dangerous erosion. Some of the most basic and...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

Constitutional & Judicial Review presume that his presence in United Kingdom might result in violence and clashes. Home Secretary is within his right to reject permission to enter UK1. Home Secretary need not give explanations to entry denial actions. A judicial Review action against the United Kingdom Home Secretary might not be very successful, even though Al's speeches in United States could not be termed as violence provoking. This charismatic leader belongs to an anti-war pressure group and it is not an offence to oppose a war. There is a lot of difference between an anti-war pressure group and a terrorism-provoking group. Anti Government sentiments are not exactly terrorist acts. Violence broke out because of pro-war protesters...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Constitutional and Judicial Review

...Constitutional and Judicial Review Introduction: The Human Rights Act of 1998 became a part of the domestic law of the United Kingdom on October 2, 2000 and in that process made the European Convention on Human Rights applicable in the United Kingdom. The Human Rights Act of 1998 thus makes it possible to raise issues relating to the European Convention on Human Rights in the courts across the United Kingdom. The affect of this is expected to nurture a culture of rights and responsibilities in the United Kingdom. It also has its consequences on the courts in the United Kingdom and the sovereignty of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Human Rights Act of 1998 and Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Human Rights Act of 1998 has led... and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Judicial review

...PART A. The act of reviewing the decisions of the lower courts, tribunals and administrative bodies by the High Court is known as judicial review in English law. Some of the court orders are certiorari, which sets aside a decision; mandamus, which makes it imperative for a duty to be performed; prohibition, which orders that an action should not be undertaken as it is unauthorized; a declaration, which defines the legal rights or obligations or an injunction. In short, judicial review is that power of a court, which empowers it to scrutinize a law or an official act of a government agent which violates the fundamental principles of justice or the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Judicial Review- public law

...Judicial Review – Public Law The principle of deference requires the courts to abstain from arriving at an independent judgment, in order to accord adequate esteem to the executive or the legislature. However, the courts have to refute the acts of the legislature or the executive, and this causes considerable controversy. The justification for such interference was elaborated upon by Lord Hoffmann in R (ProLife) v. BBC. In this context, he had stated that there was a deferential relationship between the judiciary, and the executive and the legislature. However, was unwilling to accept that there was any servility of obsequiousness involved (R (ProLife Alliance) v BBC , 2004 ). In the Prolife case the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Administrative Law Judicial Review

...The factual scenario raises various complex issues in administrative law and shall deal with the following issues in turn Whether the Greener World has Locus Standi to bring a claim for judicial review; 2) Remedies available for judicial review and what the remedy would achieve; and 4) What grounds Surinda would have for judicial review 1. Judicial review is the process by which courts scrutinise and consider the validity of the manner in which public authorities have made a decision2. The essence of judicial review is to ensure that public authorities act...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Judicial Review

...while carrying their duties and that means that in course doing their tasks, they must uphold the similar principles held by courts in judicial reviews is. On this basis, it has the full discretion to set aside the evidence set out in the initial stages and could even allow new evidence. In this regard, the independent Review ought to have heed to Claimant prayers for setting aside of evidence of witness P which formed the fulcrum of the ruling against the claimant. TIME LIMITS 54. The claimant urges this court that the application herein has not been filed in compliance with thePart 54 Rule 54 (5) of The Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Directions, 1998as read with Part2 Rule 2 (8)...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Judicial Review for FREE!

Contact Us