Nobody downloaded yet

ASSIGNMENT ( The judiciary as a referee ) - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Title: Judiciary as a Referee Student Number: Course: Tutor: May 1, 2013 Question one The constitution vests the judiciary with the powers to resolve legal disputes that arise between individuals, both natural and juristic persons, and between individuals and government officers…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.7% of users find it useful
ASSIGNMENT ( The judiciary as a referee )
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"ASSIGNMENT ( The judiciary as a referee )"

Download file to see previous pages It plays the role of a neutral arbiter, or a referee in any dispute before it, by applying the law as it is to the facts before it. The judiciary is vested with the powers to interpret the law. The Supreme Court is the court of last resort as far as interpretation of the law is concerned. The duty of the court is to interpret the statute law from parliament, to affect the purpose and intention of the parliament. The judiciary cannot make law. If the parliament is not satisfied with the way the court interprets the law, it can make law to quash the court’s interpretation. As a referee, it is the judiciary’s role to determine who should do what, or which state of affairs should prevail in any dispute that is presented before it, that is, it makes decisions. In essence, it arbitrates disputes that arise over facts and law. In doing so, the judiciary should apply the law, and should not let the personal opinion of individual judges or their bias to influence the outcome of the court. Everyone should be treated equally before the law, and it should act without fear or favour. The New Zealand legal system is an adversarial one and, therefore, the judge’s duty is just to hear cases presented by both sides, and plays minimal role as far as evidence adducing is concerned. To add, they should not make law or policy that should be a reserve of the parliament. ...
In doing so, the court can never question the validity of the Acts that have been passed by parliament. The court has jurisdiction to look into administrative decisions of public officials to ensure that they observe the law. The courts role is to ensure that the public officers execute their mandate in good faith, without malice, and pursuant to the law. In R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings [1995] 1 All ER 513, 524, stated that any action taken by a public official must be justified by a positive law. The court also has a duty to enforce and uphold personal liberty and human rights that are enshrined in the law: to wit the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Magna Carta 1215, which still applies in New Zealand. Therefore, it is the courts duty to enforce human rights and to prevent the government from abrogating human rights. In Attorney General V Chapman [2011] NZSC 110, the court held that the bill of rights does not apply to the judges in discharge of their duties. It relied on the common law protections under the judicial immunity to render New Zealand Bill of Rights’ remedies available for breach of rights by the New Zealand judges nugatory. Nevertheless, the judiciary, as a referee, it should not make laws. In essence it does, through the doctrine of precedence. For instance, the court in Fitzgerald v Muldoon [1976] 2 NZLR 615), made a decision that is considered to be part of the constitutional law. In this case, the court held that the Prime Minister had no powers to suspend law. He stated that sentiments made by the Prime Minister to that effect were contrary to the bills of right of 1688 that prohibited public authorities from suspending the law. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“ASSIGNMENT ( The judiciary as a referee ) Essay”, n.d.)
ASSIGNMENT ( The judiciary as a referee ) Essay. Retrieved from
(ASSIGNMENT ( The Judiciary As a Referee ) Essay)
ASSIGNMENT ( The Judiciary As a Referee ) Essay.
“ASSIGNMENT ( The Judiciary As a Referee ) Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Chinese Judiciary Achievements
...? Topic: In line with China’s economic reform, the Chinese judiciary has undergone formalization and institutionalization. What are the achievements and constraints the judiciary has had in the process? Introduction China has experienced fundamental and quick reforms in the legal and commercial areas since 1979. China as a country started almost from scratch and has recorded a substantial progress towards creating a commercialized arbitration system portraying international practice. Efforts have been directed by the government towards realizing a western-style legal occupation whose emphasis is on civil law which is in line with the country’s economic reforms. Despite this strides made, china is still away from achieving a wholly... ...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Referee report for paper
...? Political economy of Kenya Political Economy of Kenya This paper examines the issue of ethnic favouritism and views it as the maindeterminant of economic development. Ethnic favouritism emerged after Kenya was declared independent in 1963. Before independent, Kenya was under the rule of European’s colonial government which was of autocratic form. In 1960, Kenya gained the courage of turning over the European government and was led by Jomo Kenyatta, a Kikuyu member. After independence, ethnic groups in Kenya splinted into diverse ethnic groups. Each group occupied different geographical locations in the country. Autocratic form of government did not change even under president Jomo Kenyatta, but transitions came after the second... Political ...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
...? THE JUDICIARY (One of the Three Pillars of the Justice System) of (affiliation) A. Introduction Human society has evolved over thousands of years into what it is today. One of the hallmarks of this development is becoming a civilized society, in which people organize or form associations and arrangements for everyone to live peacefully with each other. One of its crucial distinguishing characteristic is the formation of a government, the social contract, in which citizens gave up their rights in favor of this government in exchange for some protection. In return, the government is expected to apply its laws with fairness and equality to every citizen. This is the democratic principle enshrined in the Constitution, the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
...? The Judiciary The Judiciary Introduction The purpose of this study is to show the role of the judiciary in the pursuit and implementation of social justice in the society. As a branch of the criminal justice system, the study uses the hypothesis that professionals in the field of legal affairs such as lawyers, judges and advocates can use the principles of social justice, such as solidarity, human rights and freedoms, fairness and equality to promote justice in the contemporary society. With the claim in the statement remaining so strong, the study emphasizes on the manifestation and the indicator of social justice. The professionals in the field of legal issues apparently are the only...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Judiciary Assignment
...Texas Judiciary Assignment Assignment Part This case entails of some community members who had a union that lasted for three days at the Del Lago Golf Resort located near the Lake Conroe. During the first night, the security officer forced a drunken patron from the bar and locked it earlier because of the disturbing situation. On the second night, the community members met at the resort bar to celebrate a wedding, it was during the period that tension among the communities developed. This entailed of incidents that developed tension and verbal exchanges among the individuals in the party, however, the security officer did not force anyone outside the bar. However, at around midnight,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Texas Judiciary Assignment
...Texas Judiciary Assignment Facts The case involves an individual, Bradley Smith, and Del Lago partners. The plaintiff suffered injuries as a resultof the fight that broke out at a bar owned by the defendant. The plaintiff argues that the defendant did nothing to ensure his safety at the bar since he was not the party to the fight that broke at the bar. Mr. Smith had been invited to a party at the bar and sustained injuries after an altercation ensued at the bar. In his argument, the plaintiff argued that the bar breached its duty to care under the premise-liability claim. He argued that the bar could have done more to ensure that the persons not involved in the fight were not injured. Decision Smith...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
Chinese judiciary independence
...Chinese Judiciary Independence In China, the judicial system consists of three parts: Court, Procuratorate and Public Security Organs. The Court is the judicial organ of state. Procuratorate is the state organ for legal supervision, and Public Security Organs is one of the most important parts of government mandated with the function of investigating criminal and civil cases. In order to research and discuss Chinese judiciary independence, we have to talk about three representatives and explore important data. These are Disapproval Arrest rate, Disapproval Prosecution Rate, and the quantity of Counter-appeal. In a simpler way, making a complete and legitimate judgment has three procedures in China....
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
...Judiciary assignment al affiliation) Describe judicial activism and judicial restraint Judicial activism is a legal ruling that is assumed to be based on political or personal consideration rather than on the existing act or law. It is sometimes considered the opposite of judicial restraint. Legal activism definition is a contentious issue in the United States of America, and its questions are often related to statutory construction, constitutional interpretation and separation of powers. Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation theory that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their power. It states that judges should vacillate to strike down laws unless they are apparently unconstitutional,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Referee report
...BANK CONSOLIDATION AND STABILITY: THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE, 1867-1935 Bank Consolidation and Stability: The Canadian Experience, 1867-1935 The summary/overview The manuscript tests the concepts of establishing how merger, acquisition, and consolidation may influence stability and the systemic risks. The study can be used to guide strategist on issues related systemic risks and stability when considering merger and acquisition in the banking system. Through the concept of concentration hypothesis, the researchers used the transfer-function to estimate the systemic stability for bank mergers and acquisition. The author develops a simplistic probability framework that could have application as the model of prediction. The study found... CONSOLIDAT...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
...Over the period of time American Judiciary is said to have transformed itself into foray of politics and has been on the path of what is called judicial activism. The original ideas defined in Federalist 78 clearly suggests that judiciary will be the weakest of the three institutions and it will neither have will nor force but it will merely exercise its judgment. However, over the period of time, there has been deliberate and slow blurring of the boundaries of all the institutions of the State. First and foremost one of the key and significant structural change has been the matters which are relatively undecided in the constitution. Due to relative lack of US Constitution to address certain issues, judiciary became important... the period...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic ASSIGNMENT ( The judiciary as a referee ) for FREE!
Contact Us