StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The statement of the problem that will be investigated in the paper "Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights" is: 'In making the proportionality assessments under article8 (of the European Convention of Human Rights), the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration'…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights"

?'In making the proportionality assessments under article8 (of the European Convention of Human Rights), the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration' Discuss Name: Course: Professor: Institution: City and State: Date: 'In making the proportionality assessments under article8 (of the European Convention of Human Rights), the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration' Discuss Introduction The European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) is a widely recognized set of principles that bestows fundamental rights and freedom to children. According to Article 8 of ECHR, every individual is entitled to private life, family life, correspondence and home rights. Besides human rights, the Article also details the grounds under which public officers can disregard such rights for the interest of better immigration checks. Nevertheless, even though Article 8 provides the guidelines for human rights, it also emphasizes the best interest of the children. However, reviews of juvenile legislations of many countries around the world reveal that several nations fail to secure the best interests of their children. The position of the UK courts in relation to case law and legislation In ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department1, the court held that whenever parents are faced with deportation, the authorities have to consider the best interests of the children especially where the children have UK citizenship. By taking into account the plight of children in this case, Lord Baroness made judgment that was in line with Article 8 of ECHR. In this case, a mother of two appealed in a court of law after facing deportation charges which could also affect her two children who were British citizens by birth. Even though the mother had attained asylum in the UK illegally, the court held that removing her would be disproportionate as it would violate the rights bestowed to the children in Article 8. Many governments are presently considering amending their immigration rules in order to have a clear legal framework in respect of a child’s best interest in any removal case. Notably, the interests of a child according to Moreham are taken care of where a child is allowed to remain with the parents in case of leaving the country.2 However, where a child is born in a country in which the parents are not domiciled and the state wishes to remove the parents, then the child can be granted temporary stay based on circumstances that best serve interest such as education or health. In Britain, for a child to be granted permanent residence after extradition of the parents, Thym observes that such a child must have been a resident for not less than six years.3 The position of the UK and the criteria used in discharging its duties and proportionality in protection of minors Under the UK immigration laws, the interests of children must be taken care of and therefore any British court should establish the reasonableness of moving a child to another country. The UK immigration Act 1971 prohibits removal of British citizens. However, in a situation where a non-citizen parent is forcefully removed and decides to move with the children, then the children will have no option but to move with the parent. Nevertheless, these children remain British citizen not only by virtue of birth, but also because they have been resident of UK in the course of their lives. Disappointingly, such children will not enjoy the privileges of growing in their own culture and therefore in carrying out proportionality assessment, the British legal system emphasizes that the best interest of a child must remain a key consideration. Where interest of a child is outweighed by other considerations and in a situation that demands strict adherence to immigration controls, Lord Hope argued that moving children to another country would be tantamount to making them lose the benefits of UK citizenship for the rest of their lives. Undeniably, there is an ensuing tension between provisions of ECHR and how the European Court of Human Rights interprets the provisions. While addressing the family rights issues, Article 8 follows hierarchical approach. In this respect, the rights of parents precede those of their children. In reference to British laws, Rogers points that the welfare of a child is prioritized in any decision.4 For instance in reference case O (Contact; Imposition of Conditions)5, the court declined to put the interests of the parents before that of their child. Nevertheless, subject to the principle of proportionality, the ECHR recognizes the rights of the entire family by advocating for balance of the competing rights. In Johansen v Norway,6 the court’s decision depicted the best interest of a child. Similarly, the European Court of Human Rights acknowledged in Yosef v Netherlands7 that considering the balancing act among other competing interests, the best interests of the child triumph. Treatment of children best interest by UK immigration laws Despite the UK government investing extensively in policy formulation that could provide guidelines on treatment of aliens, the children basic rights continue to be neglected hence placing their growth and development at risk. Disappointingly, the new laws allow detention of children seeking asylum hence resulting in separation from their parents. Although the United Nations Convention on Children Rights provides the guidelines on how to treat children, the UK government amended this convention by completely excluding the interest of asylum seeking children. This act goes contrary to ECHR requirement of best interest of the children. However, it is undeniable that the UK has indicated remarkable progress in safeguarding the interest of children especially citizens caught up in criminal justice involving their parents.8 Other international instruments that provide protection for children The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children (UNCRC) provides the basic rights of a child. In this regard, Article 2 of UNCRC advocate for non- discrimination, Article 3, the best interest of children, Article 6 the respect of life and finally Article 12 the need to acknowledge children opinions. Undeniably, sexual abuse and molestation are part of the worst kind of violence committed against children. According to UNICEF statistics, roughly three million children enter the “sex industry” every year. However, with such worrying numbers, the United Nations came up with a framework known as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children1989 to ensure protection of children’s rights. This framework offered protection to children not only on sexual exploitation, but also trafficking and abduction. In addition, the framework criminalizes child pornography and also provides the right for compensation. Nevertheless, the framework is closely monitored by committee on children rights which have conceded that children in Europe are not adequately protected against sexual harassment. In this regard, the committee recommended strengthening of international cooperation and adoption of extra-territorial legislations. Other frameworks that protect the rights of children include; the Human Rights Act (HRA) and Children’s Act (CA) 1989. When provisions of ECHR Article 8 became widely accepted, most legal practitioners thought that there could be difficulties in reconciling these Acts with Article 8(2) of the ECHR. The court found it unnecessary to amend the two Acts in order to comply with the convention. Considering Payne v Payne,9 the then court president argued that HRA required no revision since Article 8 upheld children’s welfare which was considered paramount despite the conflict with adult’s right. This was also echoed by Lord Nicolls in Re B (Aminor) (Respondent)10 who pointed out that there was no need for recourse of HRA since the balancing required by Article 8 was similar to one exercised by the court in any matter involving best interest of a child. To balance among the competing rights, O’Beirne argues that the family courts should consider the following principles in carrying out the proportionality test as required by the ECHR standards.11 The first consideration is the objective being pursued to justify the fundamental rights. The other two principles echoed by Van Bueren include determination of fairness of the means selected to evaluate the rights and finally the reasonableness of the means.12 However, if these principles indicate that the decision taken is not reasonable, then the court needs to carry out a factual justification for the convention to remain practical. The Dublin II Convention on the best interests of a child The Dublin II convention requires the member states to ensure best interests of a child in any case involving take back, transfer or asylum application of a separated child. Although the convention does not outright outline the children rights, Article 15 requires a member state to facilitate re-union of a child with the family if such an act is in the best interests of a child. Further Article 6 requires that where the applicant is a separated child, the member state should accept such application in the presence of family members provided it won’t deter the child’s best interest. However, research has indicated that most member countries do not consider the best interest of a child thereby worsening their vulnerability. With introduction of stringent immigration laws in the UK, the state continues to apply stringent measures hence negatively impacting the best interest of children. In Re M (Care Proceedings) (Judicial Review),13 Lord Munby held that care proceedings with intent of removal of a child from its mother were harsh and draconian as ECHR demanded more justification to such acts. Further, in R (on the application of G) v Nottingham City Council14 Lord Munby found removal of newborn from its mother without court order to be unlawful based on Article 8 since it amounted to interference with the family life. Instances in which the UK courts can interfere with protection of children’s rights Even though Article 8 requires non-interference with individual’s private rights, there are instances where non-interference of children rights principle is invoked. For instance, Glass v. The United Kingdom 15hospital staff administered medication to a severely disabled child against the mother’s will. The court held that even though the hospital staff acted for the best interest of the child, they breached Article 8 since their decision was not authorized by the court. Therefore, after the mother objection to the decision of hospital staff, the hospital should have obtained authorization to proceed with treatment. Again in X and Y v The Netherlands16 the father of a mentally ill girl argued that it was difficult for him to institute legal proceeding against a man who had sexually molested her daughter. The court disagreed with him by arguing that an individual should have a proper means to vindicate the rights to privacy. The court further asserted that irrespective of Article 8 provision, the state had to act affirmatively in such a case. The strengths and weaknesses of the approach adopted by the UK The UK introduced stringent immigration laws to check influx of unlawful immigrants. However, the country continues to abide by international conventions that seek to enhance the welfare of children though with utmost care. This has helped in controlling the number of illegal children immigrants who enter the UK. Similarly, adoption of international convention ensures that justice is delivered to children who are born by illegal immigrants’ parents. In cases where the authorities fail to provide proper parental responsibilities, the UK laws provide their parents with the right to bring proceedings against the authorities. For instance in In Re W (Children) CA17, Lord Thorpe held that there are circumstances under which an injunction can be granted to stop removal of children from their parents. However, remedies are also available under British Human Rights Acts even though they should be justified under the convention. The convention considers remedying the violation to be sufficient. For instance, in P v South Gloucestershire Council,18 the court held that awarding declaratory relief for contravening Article 8 did not guarantee remedy for damages. However, in Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC19, the court held that the claimant should sufficiently demonstrate pecuniary loss. Recommendations for protecting children with disputed cases In reference to R (A) v Croydon and R(M) v Lambeth UKSC, the case concerns determination of the appropriate person to determine if an individual is a child or an adult to help the court in providing the necessities according to Children Act 1989. The Children’s Act 1989 section 105(1), a child is any person under the age of eighteen years. Section 20(1) of the British immigration laws require the local authorities to provide accommodation to any minor in need. Even though age determination issue do not present as an important issue, it is significant mostly in the face of present rise in numbers of immigrants. Section 20(1) requires the local authorities to provide both maintenance and accommodation to such individuals. In addition, a person under eighteen years seeking asylum is entitled to discretionary leave to reside in UK even if the asylum is rejected. Conclusion In evaluating children’s rights as enshrined in Human Rights Act, it is evident that the court’s approaches have been so reductive. However, there have been notable developments in respect of provisions of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights and UK’s immigration laws. All the same, the provisions of ECHR are sometimes overlooked. Initially, the provisions of ECHR including Article 8 were not keenly taken into consideration, but presently, many judicial systems have expanded the parameters of rights protection particularly in matters of family law and children protection. Bibliography Cases Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC [2004] 1 ALL ER 833 X and Y v The Netherlands (Application No. 8978/80, Judgment of 26 March 1985), ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) B (Aminor) (Respondent) [2001] UKHL 70 Johansen v Norway [1996] 23 EHRR 33 M (Care Proceedings) (Judicial Review) [2003] 2 FLR 571 O (Contact; Imposition of Conditions) [1995] CA 1 FLR 124 Bingham MR P v South Gloucestershire Council [2007] EWCA Civ 2, [2007] Fam Law 393 Payne v Payne (2001] EWCA Civ 166, [2001] 1 FLR R (on the application of G) v Nottingham City Council [2008] EWHC 400 (Admin) W (Children) CA [2005] 2 FLR 1022 Yosef v Netherlands [2003] 1FLR 210 Journals Moreham N, ‘The right to respect for private life in the European Convention on Human Rights: a re-examination’ European Human Rights Law Review, 1, (2008), 44-79. O’Beirne B, ‘The European Court of Human Rights recent expansion of the right of privacy: a positive development?’ Coventry Law Journal, 14.2 (2009), 14-22. Rogers N, ‘Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights: are new principles emerging?’ European Human Rights Law Review, 1 (2003), 53-64. Thym D, ‘Respect for private and family life under article 8 ECHR in immigration cases: a human right to regularize illegal stay?’ International & Comparative Law Quarterly 57.1(2008), 87-112. Book Van Bueren G, The international law on the rights of the child: Kluwer Law International (The Hague: The Netherlands 1998). Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Immigration law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Immigration law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1475087-immigration-law
(Immigration Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Immigration Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1475087-immigration-law.
“Immigration Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1475087-immigration-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights

Immigration and Asylum Law

These are the concerns articulated in article three of the ECHR, a body that was established to foresee accurate implementation of laws pertaining human rights.... Running head: immigration and Asylum Law Functions of article 3 ECHR; Provision or enforcement of standards Name Lecturer Date Functions of article 3 ECHR; Provision or enforcement of standards No man or woman should be subjected to affliction and pain, treatment that has a barbaric and brutal innuendo rather than a compassionate and humane overtone or be subjected to a castigating measure aimed achieving a cruel objective....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Asylum and Immigration Law

While the European Court of human rights decided that transferring a person who would face the death penalty would not violate the Article 3 of the ECHR, if a prisoner or a person would be transferred to a country where he or she faced torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, then this would violate Article 3 of the ECHR (Collyer, 2005).... United Kingdom, 46/1990/237/307 , Council of Europe: European Court of human rights, 20 March 1991.... France, 75/1991/327/399-400 , Council of Europe: European Court of human rights, 26 June 1992, the court decided that there was not yet an expulsion order for the petitioners, who were trying to fight being expelled from France into Sri Lanka....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Economic Migration and the Effects of Asylum Seeking in Europe

The Massive waves of traveling races and persons that have left their love ones to enter the borders of the european Union countries has now changed the demographic shape of Europe, Britain and the United States.... There have been many comments about side with or side against the advantages and disadvantages of illegal entrants(Hatton, 1998) to the european Union and other industrialized countries.... he book International Migration: Trends, Policies and Economic Impact(Djajic, 2001) states that there are many illegal immigrants that have traveled from a far far away native land to try their fate looking for work in the United Kingdom and other european Countries....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Illegal Migrant Workers and Their Protection of Rights under the European Union

This research will focus mainly on evaluating whether the rights of illegal migrant workers are given protection.... Despite the enormity in numbers of migrant workers both legal and illegal entering EU states, studies show that these workers and their families are not given significant attention in regards to the protection of their rights (Cholewinski, 1997).... The rights bestowed on illegal migrant workers are still difficult to discern.... The aims can be achieved through careful scrutiny of policies and laws under which illegal migrant workers can assert the protection of rights or bring to action their claims and grievances....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Immigration Legislation in the EU

n the other side of the legal spectrum, the implementation of the Human Rights Act in 1998 (HRA) enshrines the fundamental rights and freedoms of the european convention on human rights into UK law.... This further highlighted by the dichotomy in protection afforded by the european convention on human rights (ECHR) 1950 and the Convention on the Status of Refugees 1951... However, it is precisely this paradox within the law that enables the changing Governmental policy from circumventing both entrenched immigration and asylum rules and human rights protection on grounds of “national security”2....
19 Pages (4750 words) Essay

Theories of Migration and European Immigration

By developing in line with its ideals, the european Union has shown strength and sustainability and will continue to grow.... Seeking to explore immigration policies with respect to asylum seekers and refugees from a comparative perspective, this paper proposes to analyze two different theories concerning refugee theories of migration and will undertake a comprehensive case study of refugee migration to the european Union.... Arguing that refugee migration to the european Union is an example of the 'core and periphery' theory of immigration, we will explore this phenomenon and explain how the EU has responded to this recent influx of refugee migrants seeking a better life on the shores of the european continent....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Challenges of Implementation of the United Nations Convention on Migrant Workers Right

Nevertheless, the UN Convention on Migrant Workers' Rights is trying to bridge the gap between universal human rights and national interests.... However, migration in the period of globalization has substantially heightened thus creating new human rights issues.... This paper tries to examine the reasons for the extremely low rate of ratifications of the international convention for the protection of migrant workers' rights (The United Nations convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Term Paper

Immigration Law Case Analysis

It is vital to consider the human rights Act 1998 and the Dublin Regulation because they have legal implications in immigration law.... An asylum-seeker has the right under the human rights Act 1998 to appeal against any legal decision against their asylum application.... The appeal should also be based on the human rights Act 1998.... reedom from arbitrary imprisonment and arrest is one of the fundamental human rights in the U....
10 Pages (2500 words) Report
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us