Nobody downloaded yet

Is the current state of the law satisfactory in the way it deals with the right to claim in tort or contract for pure economic l - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Author Tutor Course Date Introduction The broad range of claims for misrepresentations in tort and contract law possess the capability to provoke a lot of people to have the opinion that damages are too far easily recoverable, and the form of damages overlie and contradict one another…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
Is the current state of the law satisfactory in the way it deals with the right to claim in tort or contract for pure economic l
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Is the current state of the law satisfactory in the way it deals with the right to claim in tort or contract for pure economic l"

Download file to see previous pages Damages delivered for negligent misrepresentation are especially prominent and examines whether the law’s stance on damages for misrepresentation is satisfactory, or unnecessarily contradictory. This paper explores these queries and ultimately demonstrates that the present forms of misrepresentation are unique, complementary, and rational. The court may sometimes decline to find a duty in tort in cases where parties are within a contractual relationship or may hold that a term of a contract has barred or limited what would be a tortuous duty, pre-contractual events such as misrepresentation may give rise to an action in tort. Moreover, it is apparent that, in numerous cases exhibited by negligent failure by professionals to perform their undertakings as per the expectations of their clients, a defendant may be legally responsible for the same claimant in both tort and contract (Wright 22). Voluntary Assumption of Liability A blanket denial of liability can be considered improper, and the law remain engaged in pursuit of a new basis of practical, limited liability in tort for the incurred losses. The English Law seeks the means to limit liability in Negligence in which, under the initial design of this tort would only hinge on proof of foreseeable harm. Within the English law, the notion of assumption of liability is now expressly utilized as an autonomous basis for a Duty of Care in Negligence (Mulcahy and Tillotson 7). Voluntary assumption of liability details the notion that naturally belongs to the prefecture of the law of contract and forms the foundation of contractual liability. Whereas it is apparent that it is difficult to have a contract devoid of assumption of liability by the parties, the contrary is not obvious as the law should only award effect to an assumption of liability in case there is an enforceable Contract (Mulcahy and Tillotson 8). Allowing for the assumption of liability to operate as the grounds for extra-contractual liability can remedy the injustice. Moreover, although, the parameters detailed in the formation of a valid Contract are reasonably wide the restrictions obliged within a legal system on liability in Tort (limitation of claims in time and narrowly defined vicarious liability) may not permit the fair treatment of claims emanating out of direct dealings between the parties within circumstances in which a valid contract cannot be interfered (Wright 23). The assumption of liability may be employed as the grounds of extra-contractual liability so as to avail a means of limitation of liability for complex forms of negligent harm. The notion of assumption of responsibility as the grounds for extra-contractual, first came into manifestation within the English law in line with claims for compensation of forms of non-intentional harm such as pure economic loss. These forms of harm are complex to compensate, and the main difficulty emanates from serious policy objections to the compensation, grounded on their possibility of lack of specificity creates a risk of liability beyond what the courts can practically oblige the defendant and society to honour in absorbing the losses (Nicholas 417). Background The law of negligence can be considered as a reasonably recent development of the English Law. The notion of voluntary assumption of responsibility outside a Contract first gained prominence in English law in connection with claims regarding the claims for the compensation of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Is the current state of the law satisfactory in the way it deals with Essay”, n.d.)
Is the current state of the law satisfactory in the way it deals with Essay. Retrieved from
(Is the Current State of the Law Satisfactory in the Way It Deals With Essay)
Is the Current State of the Law Satisfactory in the Way It Deals With Essay.
“Is the Current State of the Law Satisfactory in the Way It Deals With Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Is the current state of the law satisfactory in the way it deals with the right to claim in tort or contract for pure economic l

Tort Law

..., which is general in some parts of law, refers to lawful duty for the actions of another. If a rule holds X accountable for Y's actions, then X's responsibility is said to be vicarious. Conclusion: A tort is an offence that is privately impeached, usually for damages, though some tort suits look for injunctions. The main aim of an action in tort is to recompense the injured for grievance he or she has endured due to the any of the act or omission of the offender or tortfeasor. So that in this case deals with the leakage of gas, that is mainly because of the negligence on the part of the company. Negligence is normally the failure or...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Tort law

...? Tort Law of the of the Tort Law Nervous shock is the term used by the legal profession for psychiatric injury. Such injury can be accompanied by physical symptoms. For instance, a heart attack could be engendered by psychiatric injury. A claimant for nervous shock has to submit evidence of having undergone serious psychiatric injury. Moreover, such psychiatric injury should be other than passing sorrow or fear. Such claims have to be supported by medical evidence, and the judiciary has depicted willingness to lend credence to claims entailing nervous shock.1 In order to advise Newns store in respect of its liability against its...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay


...?TORT ESSAY In Fred’s situation, the legal regulations regarding the law of tort should be applied. The will thoroughly analyze the situation based on the possible claims that Fred might have and provide legal solutions for each matter. The law of torts will be widely applied in this essay, due to the fact that it “will often help us not only to justify the existence of liability, but also guide us to determining the extent of the tort.”1 1. Fred’s claim against Paul regarding the capital gains tax I believe Fred is entitled to sue Paul for the suffered economic loss because of the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay


...? TORT LAW Institute The issue in this question requires an analysis of Occupiers Liability Act 1957 and 1984. The Acts have not defined what an occupier means, the only decisive element is that there must be control of the premises. A detailed discussion in respect an occupier was provided in the decision of Wheat v Lacon1. In respect of the facts at hand it is evident that Eric is the owner of the museum and has sufficient control over the premises to be considered as an occupier. Occupiers Liability Act 1957 deals with lawful visitors as described in s.1(2) whereby a common duty of care is owed to such visitors. The status of the entrant is quite easily that of a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Contract and tort

...arisen, which have not been adequately addressed by the traditional concepts that emerged from tort law.8 This serves to unequivocally demonstrate the independence of restitutionary claims. The principle of concurrent liability in contract and tort was recognised with Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners. In this case, it was held by the court that there could be a claim in tort, despite the existence of a contractual remedy.9 The ruling in Hedley Byrne states that assuming responsibility does not place the defendant under a duty of reasonable care to benefit the plaintiff. Jane Stapleton, an...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Tort Law situations whereby the plaintiff may file an injunction which prevents the defendant from injuring him or her or from invading one of his or her property. Tort laws are laws instituted to offer compensation to persons who have been harmed due to the irrational actions of a second or third party. The claims in tort generally involve state law, and are based on the postulation that individuals are at all times liable for their own actions, if it either directly or indirectly results in the injury of others. Tort law constitutes a branch of private law that is also...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Tort law

...result in harm. It fails to consider the extent of damage that would have resulted if an individual completely omits such a duty. In my opinion, a law reform should be implemented in order to make this law even more effective. It should reflect on the harsh clauses that can result in avoidance of duties that would be of more benefit to the society as a whole. With amendments, the Tort law would be a more effective civil law. References Faure, G. (2011). Liability for Omissions in Tort Law: Economic Analysis. Retrieved...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Contract Law and Tort Law

.... As per doctrine of privity of contract, the courts have held that a person who is not a party to the contract or in other words a third party was not protected by an exclusion clause in that contract, even if the clause purported to extend to him. The four main goals of tort law are to obtain compensation for victims of personal injury, to legally obligate the person who harmed the victim to pay punitive damages, to prevent the recurrence of similar reckless or negligent action in the future and to defend the victims' legal rights. A tort of negligence claims that the defendant is to blame for the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Contract and Tort

..."Because contract was traditionally seen as the method for resolving disputes involving pure economic loss, it was originally thought that where two parties had made a contract, a negligence action could not be used to fill in any gaps in that contract" How has Tort overcome the restrictions involved in a strict reading of the law of Contract The law of torts developed out of court decisions in providing remedies where there are no remedies available in any statutory law enacted by the legislation. In the beginning of law where...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study


...LAMPOST'S CLAIM IN THE LAW OF TORT Lampost has at least two possible causes of action for personal injuries in respect of the employer's duty to provide a safe system of work and (2) for consequential economic loss. Employer's Duty of Care. In the recent case of Jones v BBC, 2007 WL 2187023 (QBD), Jones, a freelance sound recordist for defendant BBC, claimed that he suffered personal injury caused by the negligence of the defendants. During a recording of the lowering of a windmill mast, and while Jones was walking under the inclined mast, the windmill rotor fell onto his back causing severe spinal injury rendering him paraplegic. In ruling for the claimant, the court stated that the BBC, as employer, had assumed responsibility... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Is the current state of the law satisfactory in the way it deals with the right to claim in tort or contract for pure economic l for FREE!

Contact Us