What Was the Historical Significance of Scott v Sandford - Essay Example

the ruling not only freed Dred Scott and his wife but it as well gave Congress the power of banning slavery and taking away slaves’ citizenry rights (Swain, 2004).
Despite denying slaves their constitutional rights to be protected by the federal government, the ruling played a considerable role in ending the Missouri compromise. The ruling had domino effects on the subsequent rulings. In addition, the ruling transformed the political perception between the Southern States and Northern States, forcing the Southern States and Northern States to develop a dividing feud.

Moreover, the ruling on the Scott v Sandford case enhanced the commencement of American civil wars. Based on the outcome of the ruling, the court’s decision was not correct and the court overstepped its basic role to uphold the constitutional rights of all citizens. The ruling denied slaves their constitutional basic rights. Moreover, the ruling brought the country closer to a civil war that adversely influenced the country’s development. In this case, the courts made an enormous disservice to the country by causing severe turmoil in the United States of America. By referring to the side effects of this ruling, students should understand the important of the impact of their ruling and decision on the country’s development. Making incorrect and unconstitutional rulings might have a severe impact on a country’s social, political, and economic development as explained in the above case.

What was the Historical Significance of YickWo v. Hopkins? Was the Court Correct? Why or why not?
The ruling on YickWo v. Hopkins has historical relevance as it was used as a reference point to make a ruling on over 150 landmark cases since 1886. In the ruling, the case was against YickWo who was the owner of the laundry business. According to the ruling, YickWo was discriminating against workers who were operating in the laundry building. At that historical time, it was illegal for an individual to discriminate against other people based on their race. According to my understanding, although YickWo was wrongly accused of racial discrimination, the law was very clear on crimes that related to racial discrimination. The ruling was therefore incredibly essential in reducing cases of racial discrimination in the United States (Tushnet, 2008).

YickWo v. Hopkins was the first of cases to rule in favor of minority members of the society. Consequently, based on my knowledge of the law as well as the existing law in the United States of America, the Supreme Court was correct and accurate in its ruling. The ruling supported fair and equal treatment of every individual in society by the American Bill of Rights, especially the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling was a huge victory for the minority population in the United States of America. The ruling as well helped the minority to gain more rights and freedom. This ruling affirms the reality that everyone has the right to be treated fairly and by the existing law. Based on the ruling, students ought to understand the fact that everyone in society is equal before the existing law of the land. Law students should therefore refrain from discrimination that is based on race in their future career

Part II 1) In YickWo v. Hopkins the court ruled that a law violates the 14th amendment if it is applied unfairly based on race. Do you agree with the Court's decision? Why or why not?

I completely agree with the court’s ruling on YickWo v. Hopkins case. The ruling led to a significant transformation in the existing policy, perception, and law that define the constitutional rights of all American citizens. The ruling can be described as a significant and critical step toward understanding the fact that racial discrimination is unacceptable and incorrect in a contemporary diverse society. Moreover, the ruling challenged the law that discriminated against people based on their color and racial background. This was the first time in American history for a court to make a ruling in favor of a minority section of the population.

The Fourteenth Amendment proscribed and abolished slavery in the United States of America. The 14th Amendment banned the notion that there was nothing wrong with mistreating minority people in society. Moreover, the ruling confirmed the reality that, everyone has equal constitutional rights irrespective of their racial background. Moreover, the ruling aimed at informing the public that, it is unconstitutional to judge and discriminate against an individual on the bases of their race. Individuals should therefore be judged by their actions and behaviors. This, therefore, means that individuals’ guilt should be examined about their actions as opposed to their skin color. With this ruling law students should understand that racial discrimination is unacceptable and incorrect in contemporary diverse society. Moreover, through this ruling students should acknowledge that everyone has equal constitutional rights irrespective of their racial background. Read More