Nobody downloaded yet

Legal Case Analysis - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Legal Cases Analysis Name Institution Ritchie v. People 1910 and Ritchie v. People 1895 (Testimonial Evidence) The Illinois Supreme Court proceeding that was held in the case of Ritchie v. People in 1895 stated that Section 5 of the Illinois Factory and the Workshop Inspection Statute, which limited women to work not more than eight hours in a factory, was illegal…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
Legal Case Analysis
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Legal Case Analysis"

Download file to see previous pages The issue was framed on the state’s authority to control private commercial enterprises that justified itself on protecting the health of children and women. The proceedings of this case clearly elaborated how children and women worked, and conditions of the factories they worked at as found by the Chief Factory Inspector, Florence Kelley, and her staff. The hearing and testimonies presented in the court constituted the truthful record that formed the foundation of the appeal to the Supreme Court (Ritchie v. People (1895). The laws established that the case was still in effect until the Supreme Court of United State decided that the case was in favor of the National Consumers League. This was according to Muller v. Oregon judgment that was handed over on 24 February, 1908. Soon after the United Stated Supreme conclusion in Muller v. Oregon, Louis Brandeis, the attorney in the National Consumers League, claimed that before the Supreme Court had a hearing challenging the constitutionality of the recently enacted Illinois law modeled precisely upon Oregon law that was upheld by the United States Supreme Court. It was a fair decision since that case of Ritchie v. ...
Fifteen years later, the decision became a legal nullity, even though the opinion in 1895 was never completely overruled by either the Supreme Court of Illinois or the United States Supreme Court (Herman, 1987). Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Samara Bros. Inc. (Forensic Evidence) On March 22, 2000, in an agreed decision, the Supreme Court of the United States handed a win to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. It also gave much needed intelligibility for the involved people in the case over a specific dress type and design. In the Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Samara Bros. Inc. case, the court held that the plaintiff claimed a trade right following Section 43 (a) of the Lanham Act 2 for product designs that are not registered should provide evidence that the design is unique by showing that it has a secondary meaning as a source’s indication to consumers. The court refused the inherent test for inherent uniqueness raised by the owners of the dress trade in the case, the Clinton Management, and many IP associations. This meant that the tests are unproductive and unworkable in cases dealing with product design and made a decision that product design can by no means be inherently unique; rather, uniqueness must every time be acquired (Lemley et al., 2007). Decision Highlights The court made its decision on the case and the following is a summary: 1. For it to give explanation for the raised question on a particular design of a product to meet the requirements for the trade dress protection in the situation where a registered trademark is non-existent, the court ruled that a petitioner should always avail proof that the design has obtained a secondary meaning. This resolved a tear in the US Circuit Appeal Courts (WAL-MART STORES INC. v. SAMARA BROS. INC). 2. The court ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Legal Case Analysis Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Legal Case Analysis Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Legal Case Analysis Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document



...?Legal Skills Case Analysis work Table of Contents Question 3 Question 2 3 Question 3 4 Question 4 4 Question 5 4 Question 6 6 Question 7 6 Question 8 6 Question 9 7 Question 10 8 Question 11 8 Question 12 9 Question 13 9 Question 14 9 Question 15 10 Question 16 11 Question 17 11 A) Dawson, Nolan And Walmsley Did Not Know That The Victim Had A Bad Heart. 11 B) ‘Harm’ In the Context of the Second Element of Manslaughter Means Physical Harm and Does Not Include Emotional Disturbance 12 C) ‘Harm’ In The Context Of The Second Element Of Manslaughter Includes Injury To The Person Through The Operation Of Shock Emanate From Fright, As This Can Produce Devastating And Lasting Effects, For...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Legal case analysis

...1 LEGAL CASE STUDY: KUSHNER V KING FACTS OF THE CASE Two rival professional boxing promotion corporations were locked in a legal battle concerning unethical and criminal activities perpetrated by one with the intent of gaining a solid foothold in the business and an unfair advantage over the other. Petitioner Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd., a corporation based in New York City, filed a civil complaint before the Federal District Court against respondent Don King, the sole proprietor and president of Don King Productions, Inc. and an employee and officer of its successor-in-interest DKP Corporation, both Florida-based. Petitioner alleged that respondent substantially...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Legal Case studies

...into it, thus while he may think that this is a battle between "old school" and "new school", it will not pass muster in court. In conclusion, so long as the president of the university can make his decision based upon intelligent feedback and his own wisdom, he is not abusing his discretion. He is in fact working well within his own parameters and there should be no legal consequences, whatever decision he makes. The professor would be ill advised to commence proceedings based upon this fact pattern. Paper 2 In the CPM, read the case Urofsky v. Gilmore and answer Questions 2 and 3 2. The various opinions issued by the en banc court in Urofsky provide an instructive debate, and an interesting...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Legal case

...THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF STADIUM CONSTRUCTION I. Introduction of the Case A. ment of the Facts On January 12, 1971, in his annual address to the Legislature, Governor Cahill noted the potential of a sports complex in the meadowlands to be occupied by one or more major league sports teams. On April 19, 1971, the Sports Complex bill was introduced and overwhelmingly passed in the Senate by a 28-2 vote and in the Assembly by a 53-6 vote. On May 10, 1971 Governor Cahill signed L.1971, c. 137, the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority Law, now cited as N.J.S.A. 5:10-1 et seq. The act creates the Authority as "an instrumentality of the State exercising public and essential governmental functions." The...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Case Analysis (Legal Methods)

...Read carefully through the speech of L.J Scott in the attached law report of the decision in Mirvahedy v Henley (2003), and answer the following questions (each part of the question will be allocated the percentage of marks indicated in the brackets): (a) What were the material facts of the case? (10%) (b) What was the legal issue(s) which the court had to decide? (10%) (c) What approach to statutory interpretation did L.J. Scott take in his speech? (30%) (d) In what way(s) did he deal with precedents? (30%) (e) What do you think the ratio decidendi of Mirvahedy v Henley is on the basis of reading this speech? (20%) The material facts of the case centre on the liability of the defendants...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Is legal pluralism incompatible with the human rights An analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to Turkey

...are essentially incompatible with legal pluralism? The concept of universal human rights raises the issue of a controversy in the relationship between (a) institutionalization of religion in the State through religious beliefs or practices versus human rights norms.2 This study will examine whether universal human rights could be compatible with maintenance of religious and cultural diversity. Analysis: Those advocating universality claim that international human rights “are and must be the same everywhere”, just like the rights to equal protection, physical security, rights to freedom of speech, expression and religion and the right to a fair trial3. As pointed out by Donnelly, human rights on a...
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay

10 Legal Case briefs

...Case briefs Grade (17th, Nov. Case briefs Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) 2. Procedural History: The case was first heard in a New Hampshire trial court, followed by a petition raised in the Supreme Court, which affirmed the ruling of the first court. 3. Facts: Chaplinsky applied abusive words towards a city marshal; calling him a God damned racketeer and fascist. These abusive words were used in a public place. 4. Issue(s): The issue is whether the application of the statute in Chaplinsky case violated his rights for free speech as provided under the first amendment of the US constitution. 5. Reasoning: The reasoning applied under this...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Case Analysis Presentation(climb the legal ladder)

...Climb the legal ladder In this case it is expected that Sullivan and Cromwell associates should feel that their pay structure is fair. The firm uses the lock-step model where the partners are paid to an important degree on the basis of their seniority. The other important aspect that is considered when determining pay structure is related to experience. Experienced associates earn more than less experienced associates. The level of performance is also used as a yardstick to determine the level of pay structure for each individual. In this case, the associates are likely to make comparisons related to their level of experience and period they have worked for the company in order to...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

With the aid of case law, statutory provisions and academic analysis, critically discuss the approach of the courts to the definition of banking and banking business in Re Roes Legal Charge: Park Street Securities Ltd v Albert William Roe [

...of the transactions, and not just to their structure or form. In arriving at their verdict that whether the appellant was carrying on bona fide banking business and to derive at the meaning of ‘banking business’ and ‘banking’, the court of appeal relied on the case laws of United Dominions Trust v Kirkwood, Bank of Chettinad Limited of Colombo v. Commissioners of Income Tax ,Colombo, and Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corp. Bibliography Books Asser T M C, Legal Aspects of Regulatory Treatment of Banks in Distress. (1st edition, International Monetary Fund 2001) Beale H, Bridge M, Gulliver L & Lomnicka E, The Law of Security and Title –Based Financing (1st edition, Oxford University Press 2012) Bradgate R &...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Resocialization of Prisons

4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Legal Case Analysis for FREE!

Contact Us