The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999 - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Essay question - the doctrine of privity of contract and the impact of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. The doctrine of privity of contract takes the position that only those parties to the contract are entitled to enforce contractual obligations.1 For example, a contract between two persons which has a benefit for a third party (an individual who is not a party to the contract), the doctrine of privity of contract prevents the third party taking action to enforce the terms and conditions of the contract.2 The potential for injustice surrounding the doctrine of privity of contract has been noted by the courts…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999"

Download file to see previous pages 121, 1991) the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 which essentially modified the doctrine of privity of contract and confers upon third parties a limited right of action relative to a contract which confers upon the third party a benefit. Ultimately a third party may enforce a term or condition of a contract if the contract “expressly” makes provision for the right of the third party to enforce a term of the contract.5 Secondly, a third party may enforce a contractual term if the term “purports to confer a benefit” on that third party.6 It is assumed that once parties to a contract confer on a third party a benefit under a contract, the contracting parties intend that the third party may enforce the term creating the relevant benefit.7 In Nisshin Shipping Co. Ltd. v Cleaves & Co. Ltd. it was held that the assumption that parties to a contract intend that a third party with a benefit under the contract can enforce the term creating the benefit can only be rebutted by substantial evidence to the contrary.8 In other words there must be proof that the contracting parties did not intend that the third party have enforceable rights under the contract. Otherwise the third party must be identified either expressly or by description in the body of the contract in order to get around the doctrine of privity of contract.9 Essay question – restraint of trade – employees and sale of business. Restraint of trade clauses in contracts of employment are intended by employers to safeguard against competition from former employees.10 Similarly, upon the sale of a business, a contract for the sale of the business may contain a covenant in which the vendor covenants not to engage in a business area for a prescribed period in order to safeguard against the deterioration of goodwill purchased by the purchaser.11 When a business is sold or transferred to another party, an existing restraint of trade agreement impacting an employee survives the transfer of the business.12 Like employment covenants for the restraint of trade13a covenant for the restraint of trade under an agreement for the sale of a business will be generally upheld when the restraint of trade covenant is reasonable.14 It was held in Dairy Crest Ltd. v Pigott that an employer may only enforce an agreement in restraint of trade for preventing unfair competition as opposed to competition altogether.15 Ultimately, the restraint of trade clause in a contract of employment or in the sale of transfer of a business must be reasonable in that it must be for the purpose of protecting a legitimate interest. For instance it would not be unreasonable for an employer or a purchaser to want to protect trade secrets or confidential information relevant to trade.16 In Danaway, Day & Co. Ltd. v De Braconier D’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/law/1452132-contract-law-exam
(The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1452132-contract-law-exam.
“The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1452132-contract-law-exam.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999

International Commercial Arbitration and Privity of Contract

...and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future Prospects. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers Inc. Strong, SI 1998. ‘Intervention and Joiner as of Right in International Arbitration: An Infringement of Individual Contract Rights or a Proper Equitable Measure?’. Vand. Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 31, no. 915. Watson-Hamilton, J 2003. “The impact of international commercial arbitration on Canadian law and courts’ in Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice Conference on "Participatory Justice in a Global Economy: The New Rule of Law?. Montreal: Themis. Zekos, GI 1999. ‘Problems of Applicable Law in Commercial and...
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay

Buy American Act for Government Contracts

...?BUY AMERICAN ACT FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS Summary of the main points The Buy American Act is a legislation that was designed to aid the ARRA provisions by establishing more strict conditions over imports to be used in construction of public utility facilities. According to the act, all contracts under public facility construction must comply to the original ARRA rules. Contrary to the provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment act, the buy American act does not pay regard to period or the cost involved in the contract. The provisions of the Buy American Act therefore ensure...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Common Law and the Doctrine of Privity

...? Common Law and the Doctrine of Privity Department: The common law, also known as ‘the general rule’,states that only a party to a contract can enforce or execute its standings. Any other person such as a third party is deemed to be an alien to the contract and as such, cannot enforce it. However, with implementation of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (hereafter “the Act”) many transformations have been witnessed, consequently enabling third parties to enforce terms in contracts. In essence, the common law is built on a number of key principles that stipulate that the...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Privity of Contract

...permitted third parties, such as stevedores, to benefit from the limitation of liability clauses in certain contracts of carriage made between a shipper of goods and the carrier21. Provincial legislation also contains other exceptions to the privity doctrine. A bill of lading serves as both evidence of a contract of carriage and a document of title to the goods being carried. The bill of lading initially involves the seller of the goods (consignor) and the carrier and will finally be endorsed to a third party, consignee. In order to facilitate transport of goods, under s. 2 of the Nova Scotia Bills of Lading Act22, a consignee receives all rights of action. Under the...
24 Pages(6000 words)Case Study

Law of contract- Exclusion causes and privity

...in suit was allocated for the third party by the promisor. The doctrine of privity is also excepted in case of contracts running with the land for the benefit of the third party where a dependant can take over his father's land for instance. In agency, a person who acts as an agent on behalf of the principal, he or the principal though not both can and enforce a contract. This is common in the contracts of carriage of goods. In this case none of the people involved contracted as agent and therefore the exception does not apply in the context. Also in case of trusts, the third parties can beneficiary take action that...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Contract law, Doctrine of consideration

...being maintained. Instead of basing their decisions on this doctrine, the Courts have attempted to identify consideration in contract cases in order to redress the genuine grievances of the parties to whom an injustice had been done. Bibliography. 1. P.S Atiyah 'Consideration: a restatement' in Essays on Contract, Oxford University Press, 1986. 2. P.S Atiyah 'An introduction to the law of contract' 5th ed., Clarendon Press Oxford, 1995. 3. H.G Beale, W.D Wishop, M.P furmston, 'Contract: cases and materials' 4th ed., Butterworth, 2000. 4. M. Cope 'Duress, undue influence and unconscientious bargains', Monash studies in law, The law book company Ltd,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

2 contract law assignments

...Assessment Questions and 2 damages prior to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 functions to circumvent the impact of party autonomy in respect of contractual obligations and liabilities. The 1999 Act contracting parties can by implication or otherwise confer certain enforceable rights on third parties. Although the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 stifles the privity of contract rule, it does not abolish it.1 ...
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay

Contract law part 2

...for Martin as wife would be well protected under marriage contract terms and agreement. 7. Discuss critically the impact of the Privity of Contract and the Contracts Act 1999 and Reasonableness and the common law doctrine of fundamental breach. Privity of Contract The rule of privity of contract is nothing but the principle that a third party cannot sue for damages on a contract to which he is not a party. This rule has attracted severe criticism as it benefits the third party. Surprisingly, European Union also...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

International Commercial Arbitration: Privity of Contract in Arbitration Agreements

...the court and arbitration tribunals. However, it was rather indifferent to determine the aspect of contract waiver in both cases. Conclusion Having exhausted the fundamentals of arbitrations agreements, it is plausible to note that privity of contract is synonymous in both local and international laws of contract except where it impacts on administrative interest. That notwithstanding, every arbitration law endeavours to provide protection to its parties without necessarily attracting legal relations. However, and subject to international laws, the courts can always intervene if the partied thereon believes that the set arbitration tribunal has...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

Buy American Act for Government contracts

...BUY AMERICAN ACT FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS Summary of the main points The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, also known as ARRA, was an initiative for stimulating the nation’s economy by maintaining a favorable balance of payment. “Buy American” requirements are a set of supplementary regulations to the ARRA. The requirements tighten the provisions of the ARRA requirements by subjecting all contracts to the former rules, irrespective of the size of the contract or the period in which the contract is to be carried out. Subject to three waivers, the Buy American regulations ensures that materials for use in construction of public...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999 for FREE!

Contact Us