Nobody downloaded yet

Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United States - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Date Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United States Introduction It is agreeable that the criminal justice system plays a very critical role in ensuring that the rule of law is observed and helps in imposing penalties to those who violate laws…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful
Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United States
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United States"

Download file to see previous pages This paper will discuss plea bargaining as a flaw in the criminal justice system. Plea bargaining is defined as a process whereby a defendant in a criminal case and the prosecutor reach a conclusion (which is mutually satisfactory) to end the criminal case at hand, subject to approval by the court. Successful plea bargaining lead to a plea agreement between the defendant and the prosecutor, where the former agrees to be plead guilty to the offence without a trial (Robert and Stuntz 24). In return, the prosecutor consents to make favorable recommendations to the court or dismiss specific charges regarding the case. However, plea bargaining is considered as a flaw in the criminal justice system. Its critics argue that it is a shortcut to justice, and therefore the due process of the law may not be followed fully. Besides, it is considered as a flaw in the criminal justice system because it is deemed to be unfair to criminal defendants. This is because the prosecutors tend to have so much power in deciding the charges that a defendant may face (Hessick and Saujani 197). Also, since the prosecutors are evaluated to a greater extent on their rates of conviction, plea bargaining may force them to try at all costs to win the case. conversely, plea bargaining is a flaw in the criminal justice system because it is likely to soften punishment’s deterrent effect a s the defendant has an opportunity to bargain for lesser punishments (Hessick, Andrew and Saujani 81-82). Origin and Impact of Plea Bargaining Plea bargaining is a critical part of the United States’ criminal justice system; actually, majority of the criminal cases in America are settled using this means instead by jury trial. Plea bargaining traces its origin to the case of Brady v. United States in 1970 when the defendant (Robert Brady) tried to alter his plea after he had agreed to plead guilty to kidnapping for a lesser sentence (Fisher 44). Brady’s move was motivated by the desire to avoid death penalty. However, upon hearing the case, the Supreme Court ruled that his plea was legitimate because had an option of refusing the offer by the prosecutor. Subsequent case also showed that the Supreme Court approved the legality of plea bargaining. In the case of Santobello v New York in 1971, the legality of plea bargaining was challenged when the prosecutor was accused by the defendant of breaching their plea agreement by recommending a punishment that was harsher than the one they had agreed upon. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendant; it argued that legal validity of plea bargaining to be achieved, the defendant and the prosecutor should adhere to the plea agreement’s terms. This case set a precedent that each plea bargaining must be approved by the court for it to be legally valid. Since then it has been entrenched in America’s criminal justice system (Bibas 2471). However, several studies have shown that it affects criminal justice system by giving the prosecutor more discretion that may lead to unfairness on the part of the defendant and by granting the defendant lesser punishment. The following cases bring the flaw mentioned above: Bordenkircher v. Hayes where the court approved unfair handling of the case by the prosecutor; and in Marshall v. Barlow’s Inc where the defendant was granted lesser punishment despite the gravity ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United Essay)
“Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United States

Plea Bargaining

...?PLEA BARGAINING Plea bargaining can be defined ,“as an agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant whereby the defendant is allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge rather than risk conviction for a graver crime in order to avoid a protracted trial or to win the defendant's cooperation as a witness”. Defining plea bargaining can help understand what plea bargaining is. Plea bargaining can help an individual and hurt an individual. Many may argue the fact of whether plea bargaining is beneficial. The judicial system...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Plea Bargaining

...?Plea Bargaining Plea bargaining is a process in criminal trials where the defense and the prosecution discuss the possibility of coming up with an agreement that benefits both parties to the case. When it is successful, there is a plea bargain deal which is then submitted to the court for approval. Plea bargaining plays a very significant role in our criminal justice system. It is a win-win formula for all parties involved in the case, including the trial court hearing the case because a successful deal means one case less on their overcrowded dockets. On the part of the prosecution, the advantage is the assurance of having a conviction, albeit for a lesser crime or minimal penalty, over the possibility of the accused walking off... that he...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment


...., (1997) “Converging Criminal Justice Systems: Guilty Pleas and the Public Interest”. Isr. L. Rev., 31, pp. 169 Grossman, G.M. & Katz, M.L., (1983) "Plea bargaining and social welfare", The American Economic Review 73 (4): 749–757 Kipnis, K., (1979) “Plea Bargaining: A Critic's Rejoinder”. Law & Soc'y Rev. 13, pp. 555 Ross, J.E., (2006), "The Entrenched Position of Plea Bargaining in United States Legal Practice", The American Journal of Comparative Law 54: 717–732, Schulhofer, S.J., (1992), "Plea Bargaining as Disaster". The Yale Law Journal 101 (8): 1979–2009... ?Running Head: Plea-bargaining Plea-bargaining Lecturer: Plea-bargaining...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Term Paper for Criminal Justice Class about plea bargaining

...? Ethics of Plea Bargaining Plea Bargaining The plea bargaining system arose due to the increasing complexity, duration, and costof criminal trials, and it gained importance due to the increasing use of adversary procedures based on the law of evidence. However, the foundations of plea bargaining are a throwback to the adversarial system of justice, whereby the main function of the system trial is to identify the material truth and ascertaining which contesting party can offer a better case. Pleas are...
9 Pages(2250 words)Term Paper

Plea Bargaining

...agreement does not necessarily mean the individual is guaranteed to have actually committed the crime. However, one of the greatest issues concerning whether to abandon plea bargain agreements is the indirect effects which can befall the individual’s rights. “…attempts to abolish plea bargaining often produce a number of offsetting changes because overall policies fail to consider the reasons for negotiations” (Nuebauer, 287). For example, when the Coast Guard criminal justice system successfully abolished plea agreements in special court martial circumstances, no augmentation in the severity of...
3 Pages(750 words)Admission/Application Essay

Plea bargaining

...Plea Bargains and Morality A plea bargain is an agreement where the prosecutor offers the defendant an opportunity to plead guilty to lesser charge, often in exchange for a lesser punishment. There are multiple moral issues that arise regarding plea bargains. The first has to do with the concern that plea-bargaining provides too much leniency for the guilty. If the purpose of the justice system is to deter crime, then it must administer punishments that are harsher than the perceived benefit of committing that crime. For example, it would be foolish to administer a one...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Plea Bargaining

...Plea Bargaining in American Samoa, “It Does Not Work” In the sphere of judiciary literature, the court has always concentrated on the of jurytrials which can be regarded as the nucleus theme of any types of criminal procedures. This preexistent view of the judiciary system can be said to be established as a norm in the purpose of protecting the attributes of innocence and drawing clean lines with the exclusion of the civil proceedings and its collateral. The concept of plea bargaining has been established as a breakaway trajectory from the preexistent omnipotent system of jury trials. In the United...
25 Pages(6250 words)Research Paper

Plea Bargaining in the United States Criminal Justice System

...Plea Bargaining With the US Criminal Justice System Plea Bargaining Within the definition of roles and powers of different judicial officers, the prosecution reserves the power of determination of the most relevant aspect of criminal liability to claim in the prosecution. The courts require that sufficient disclosures between the defense counsel and the prosecution proceeds on mutual consideration for execution of duties. The action of the court during criminal proceedings begins with the arraignment or initial presentation of the defendant in court to answer to charges. Arraignment attains two basic functions, which include reading the charges and allowing the accused to make a plea, which might be stating whether they are guilty... find it...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay


...that the prosecution could still succeed in proving them guilty facilitates decision for plea-bargaining. Fear of bias in the judicial process could also be a factor (Siegel & Worrall 202, 203). Plea-bargaining does not serve justice to any stakeholder but only offer convenience to the overburdened criminal justice system. It only grants lenient charges to defendants, may force innocent defendants to plead guilty, and establish convenience for the prosecution and the judges, aspects that do not identify justice. Victims and the society however suffer injustice as wrongs against them...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Plea Bargaining

..., there was major underfunding within the judicial system, unlike other state government elements that fared much better in the recent economic crisis of 2009/2010 (Bibas, n.d.). Considering that most expenses within the judiciary are staff wages, it has been argued in the past that plea bargaining is the best thing that happened to the judicial system. Political analysts and lawmakers have dubbed plea-bargaining as "the new criminal justice system." Because plea-bargaining offers both efficiency and reduced logistical and financial...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Plea Bargaining - A Flaw in the Criminal Justice System in the United States for FREE!

Contact Us