Nobody downloaded yet

Lord Joffe's Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Relation to the Right to Die - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Lord Joffe’s Bill: Moral and legal justifications for change in law in relation to the right to die Introduction The right to live is a natural right everywhere whereas the right to die is a controversial topic all over the world. “Many faith groups within Christian, Muslim, Jewish and other religions believe that God gives life and therefore only God should take it away”1…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
Lord Joffes Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Relation to the Right to Die
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Lord Joffe's Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Relation to the Right to Die"

Download file to see previous pages These organizations believe that a person is fully authorised to make decisions about the sustainment of his life in this world and nobody has any right to prevent him from doing so. In their opinion, right to live and right die are fundamental rights which are equally important. Public opinion about the right to die has been changed a lot in recent past. Today, even some of the religious groups are favouring right to die on certain occasions. This is because of the increasing cases of people falling in no hope conditions. It should be noted that plenty of people all over the world are currently sustaining their life with the help of medical equipment and the hope for survival is almost nil for them. Under such circumstances, the debate over the right to die is getting intensified in recent times. Australia is the first country which legalized the right to die. Countries like Netherlands and Canada also did the same thing later. In some states of America, right to die is made legal. However, UK is one country in which the right to die has not been approved legally yet. Lord Joffe proposed a bill in the House of Lords in 2006, to make physician-assisted suicide (PAS) legal in the case of people who are terminally ill. This bill was a modified version of a previous Bill proposed by Lord Mackay in 2005. “Friday 12May 2006 witnessed the second reading in the House of Lords of Lord Joffe’s Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill”2. However, this bill was failed in the House of Lords because of its inability to gather majority. The bill was defeated by a margin of 148 to 1003. This paper analyses the moral and legal justifications of Lord Joffe’s bill. Moral justifications of Lord Joffe’s bill According to Keown (2007), “If the principled arguments which underpinned the Bill are accepted, the case is made not simply for PAS, but for active euthanasia, voluntary and non-voluntary”4. Physician assisted suicide and euthanasia are entirely different things. Physician assisted suicide (PAS) or mercy killing is more acceptable to the public than euthanasia. PAS is nothing but helping a person in terminating his life whereas “Euthanasia is the intentional termination of life by somebody other than the person concerned at his or her request”5. In short, euthanasia is nothing but another form of killing even if it is performed with the consent of the victim. Moral laws cannot justify killing of a human being under any circumstances. Even after huge developments in science and technology, nobody knows the secrets behind life and death. Even though medical science advanced a lot, no healthcare professional was able to produce an artificial life in a laboratory condition. In other words, only the creator knows the secrets behind life. Once it is taken, nobody can return a life. Under these circumstances, the authority or the right of a person to take the life of another person may not be acceptable to anyone. It is better to leave the destiny of the person in trouble to the creator rather than attempting to help him by killing him. According to the Jewish perspectives on euthanasia; “There is a time to be born and a time to die”' (Ecclesiastes 3:2a)6. In other words, PAS and euthanasia are immoral according to the beliefs of Jews. Now, the question is whether the death of a person is personal or not. “ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Lord Joffe's Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Essay”, n.d.)
Lord Joffe's Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Essay. Retrieved from
(Lord Joffe'S Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Essay)
Lord Joffe'S Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Essay.
“Lord Joffe'S Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Lord Joffe's Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Relation to the Right to Die

Right to Die

...: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics and Euthanasia:" Ethics, Medical Suicide, Assisted-Ethical, Physician's Role 1st ser. 27.51-70 (2011): 1-64. CINAHL. Web. Gurney, Matt. "Euthanasia a Right Long Denied; Quebec Report Suggests Legalized Option for Dying." National Post [Canada] 23 Mar. 2012, National Edition ed., NEWS; Pg. A2 sec.: 10-999. Print. Hume, Mark. "Experts Defend Right to Die Laws." The Globe and Mai [Canada] 6 Dec. 2011, Bristish Columbia News; Courts; Pg. S3 sec.: S.3. Print. "Hypocrisy and the Hippocratic Oath." Web log post. The Western Confucian. Web Blog, 2 Aug. 2011. Web. Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

The Right to Die: Euthanasia

Olson, for example, details the circumstance of a particular woman who was not competent to argue for herself and, through many cases of abuse w...ithin the system concentrated on monetary concerns instead of humanitarian ones, was a casualty of the Oregon euthanasia laws. O’Brien shows how a thriving writer might have unintentionally cut short an exceptional career had euthanasia been a choice at the time he first endured a paralyzing accident. Opponents to state-sanctioned euthanasia claim that the practice would be in violation of the Hippocratic Oath and that it also would result in a devaluation of human life. Life is held as sacred in America more so than in some other countries consequently the decisions other culture...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay


...from. In conclusion, one fact stands out. The ending of one’s life is an act which should not be advocated for at all. The position that I take in relation to this matter is that I am totally against it. This is so because it goes against the societal and religious morals upon which the character of most individuals are founded. Works Cited N.d. Web. 30 Oct 2012. Manoj, Kumar Mohanty. "Variants of homicide: a review". Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine: August 2004. Print. YouTube. Right to Die - Interview with Andrew Copson, 2006. Web. 30 Oct 2012. Smith, Wesley. 'Right to...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Euthanasia/Right to Die

...the patients alive and must do all practical interventions within their power to do so under the guidelines of the professional principles outlined in the Hippocratic Oath. This opposing argument goes further to state the catastrophic risk involved in sanctioning euthanasia as it may potentially lead to cases of murder (Zdenkowski, 1997); for instance, euthanasia may unfairly victimize the poor and disabled as it may become an incentive to insurance companies to end patients’ lives to save money. In the current health care setting, both partial and active euthanasia is not permitted because the nursing professionals are opposed to the practice due to both moral and legal considerations. There have been...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Legal Services Bill 2006 Board. Dissent and misgivings to the bill have been expressed. John Hemming's Web Log John's Reference Website says that it will bring in the "Tyranny of the Consumer" . According to him : " The UK constitution and many others operate on the basis of a separation of powers. It is important that the process of interpreting law is independent of government. That is key for avoiding a corrupt tyrannical society. Ideally justice needs to be done and be seen to be done"7 However, reforms of this nature are necessary, and in keeping with the changes made in other countries, and changing legal perceptions and needs, we may conclude that the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

The Climate Change Bill a world leader. Global environmental law can only be regulated by virtue of international and multilateral treaties and conventions.17 However, the UK has taken these international obligations a step further by binding itself to statutory law under the auspices of the Climate Change Bill 2007. The UK’s Climate Change Bill is the first legislative effort by any country to effectively bind a country to the legal obligation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.18 The commitment to reduce global carbon dioxide emissions was intensified by the Committee on Climate Change’s recommendation that the UK...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Right to Die persuasuve speech for

...the Association for the Right to Die with Dignity (ADMD) in France now has more than 40,000 members (Sokol, 2007) Conclusion: We have seen the arguments for mercy killing and we have seen how it really is not a form of killing but more an act of mercy and self determination. Therefore, to conclude, it is about time it is viewed as a human right as expressed in the constitution rather than a form of killing. In the end, Giving preference to death is not easy but it has to be given when it is the right thing to be done. References Vaknin, S. Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited. Narcissus Publishing. (2003). Fisher, I. “A Poet Crusades for the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Women' s right

...Grace Chang: Disposable domestics The book offers a broad of how immigrant women go to the extent of taking low-wage job and getting into numerous collusion path with the U.S government as well as the hiring organizations. The author seek to offer a detailed account of the challenges that the immigrant women must endure in order to survive and provide for their families. Together with Miriam Louie, they sought offer a voice to the many immigrant women who are constantly under threats and intimidations. Chang writes a compelling and disturbing account of the complicity between the U.S. government, private employers and corporations to control welfare and immigrant policies to the detriment of poor women....
1 Pages(250 words)Book Report/Review

Right to die

..., emphasis on Euthanasia need to act on rules applied globally while behaving like everyone else. The idea applies to one supreme principle of morality called categorical imperative. The principle represents Euthanasia since it demonstrates maximum acts of individuals at the same time according to the universal law on the rights to die. Moreover, emphasis applies in demonstrating individual actions while making decisions to focus on general rules that everyone is willing to follow before making any decisions (Rachels, 1986). References Rachels, J. (1986). The Morality of Euthanasia. Oxford University Press.... Right to Die Rachel’s Use of Golden Rule in Deciding Euthanasia Issue Rachel’s use of golden rule...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Right to Die Laws

...are intertwined in the debate over Euthanasia. This paper considers the issue from a wide variety of perspectives that include examining the right to die laws and whether it is legal for the physicians to assist in Euthanasia. The other side of the debate, namely, whether it is moral for the physicians to prolong life of a patient who might be a “vegetable” for all practical purposes is considered as well. RIGHT TO DIE LAWS Much has been written about Oregon’s Death with Dignity act that makes assisted suicide legal. Now the advocates for the same have been proposing to introduce...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Lord Joffe's Bill: Moral and Legal Justifications for Change in Law in Relation to the Right to Die for FREE!

Contact Us