Nobody downloaded yet

Foundation of Criminal Law - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Foundation of Criminal Law
The prosecution must be able to prove mens rea; that is, the accused had an appropriate knowledge, criminal intelligence, intention, or recklessness at the relevant time. Recklessness is one of the four likely mental state classes that constitute mens rea…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Foundation of Criminal Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Foundation of Criminal Law"

Download file to see previous pages Recklessness may constitute offenses that involve considerable danger to another person or against property. N.P. Metcalfe and A.J. Ashworth, in their case commentary, Arson: mens rea - recklessness whether property destroyed or damaged’ (2004) Crim L R 369, analyse and critically evaluate the decisions of the House of Lords in R v G [2003] UKHL 50; [2004] 1 A.C. 1034 and R. v Caldwell (James) [1982] A.C. 341. This paper will briefly identify the key arguments that were advanced in the commentary and discuss whether Metcalfe and Ashworth’s critical evaluation of the tow decisions is persuasively argued.
In the case of R v Caldwell, Metcalfe and Ashworth comment that throughout the judgement of R v Caldwell, Lord Diplock appeared to only address his mind to the class of defendant who would normally have the capacity of foreseeing the risk. They thus argue that this narrow focus in the case is what subsequently led to the arising of the problems in this case. They further comment that the House of Lords did not consider particular classes of defendant who would not be able to foresee any risk, even though they could have been asked to think about foreseeing.
Metcalfe and Ashworth also made a commentary in the decision of the House of Lords relating to mens rea and which was quite related to the case of R v Caldwell; this was the case of R v G. In this case, the issue was whether the children of eight or more years are able to have an understanding of the difference between right and wrong, and if the test of “obviousness” might operate fairly for the defendants who were of 11 and 12 years age if they were held to similar standard as reasonable adults. 4 The House of Lords in this respect stated that a person can be considered to act “recklessly” if: he is in a circumstance that he is aware that a risk will or exists; in a result when he is aware that a risk will happen; and if it occurs to him that it is unreasonable to take risk, in circumstances that are known to him.5 Moreover, in their commentary, Metcalfe and Ashworth noted how the House of Lords in R v G departed from the House of Lords’ decision in R v Caldwell. Metcalfe and Ashworth argue that Lord Diplock’s ruling in R v Caldwell could not be supported by statutory interpretations, as both Lord Bingham and Lord Steyn clearly spelt out in R v G. Besides, they comment that the considerations in R v Caldwell not only misinterpreted the statute, but also went against the principle that require subjective mens rea for serious crime conviction, and which led to unfair results that may not be either just or moral. They also point out how application of the decision in R v Caldwell would amount to injustice as it violates the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.6 Metcalfe and Ashworth acknowledge in their commentary that the meaning of “recklessness” cannot only be applied in the Criminal Damage Act as had seemed to be implied in R v Caldwell. They note that Lord Bingham in the case of R v G though that Lord Diplock and other majority members in R v Caldwell were so set in the course to an extent that they could not have reached a different outcome regarding the case involving the capacity of children and young persons. Metcalfe and Ashworth argue that their was stubbornness in the interpretation of “reckless” in R v Caldwell and other similar cases in 1980s, a ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1445721-foundation-of-criminal-law
(Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1445721-foundation-of-criminal-law.
“Foundation of Criminal Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1445721-foundation-of-criminal-law.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Foundation of Criminal Law

Criminal Law

...of sexual infidelity of victim in defence to murder’ The Times (London, 30 January 2012) 49 Attorney General for Jersey v Holley [2005] 3 WLR 29 Clough A, ‘Loss of Self – control as a Defence: The Key to Replacing Provocation’ (2010) 74(2) JCL 118 — — ‘Sexual Infidelity: The Exclusion that never was?’ (2012) 76 JCL 382 Coroners and Justice Act 2009 Edwards SSM, ‘Anger and Fear as Justifiable Preludes for Loss of Self-Control’ (2010) 74(3) JCL 223 Gibb F, ‘Killers can use crime of passion defence, jurors told’ The Times (London, 18 January 2012) 9 Homicide Act 1957 Monaghan N, Criminal Law Directions (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012) Norrie A, ‘The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 – Partial Defences to...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Criminal justice/ criminal law

...and Tokyo Tribunal were both of ad hoc nature.2 It was during the Genocide Convention of the United Nations that the idea of a permanent international criminal tribunal took shape. Draft statutes were consequently prepared by the International Law Commission (ILC), but these efforts were hampered by the difficulty in coming to an accord on how to define aggression. In 1989, Trinidad and Tobago and several other Caribbean and Latin American states and NGOs petitioned for the continuation towards efforts to establish an international criminal tribunal to try drug trafficking cases. In the 1990s, events in Eastern Europe and Africa necessitated the establishment of ad hoc tribunals to try...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Foundation Law Assignment

...? Foundation Law No: Roll No: Foundation Law Under the definition of English law, injury inflicted upon a body, mind or emotions of a person other than the property falls under the ambit of Personal Injury. The term of personal injury is frequently used in the law suits filed under the law of tort. The law suit filed under the law of tort indicates that the cause of action attributes to negligence or carelessness of another person. Personal injury cases can be filed in a competent court of law under the garb of defamation law or law of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

Foundation of Criminal Law

...? Foundations of Criminal Law Question Criminal damage refers to the malicious, intentional or unintentional destruction of another person’s property by acts such as arson. The law on criminal damage is contained in the criminal damage act of 1971 under the English law (Katz, Moore and Morse, 1999, p.76). The act creates offenses that are meant to protect property and provides a framework for dealing with offences such as arson and which may endanger lives. Punishments under this act can include imprisonment for life, penalties and victim compensation. There exist three main categories of offences under...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Foundation of Criminal Law

...?Journal Article Analysis of Metcalfe and Ashworth’s Arson: mens rea - recklessness whether property destroyed or damaged In Metcalfe and Ashworth’s case commentary of R v G1, a case which quashed the conviction of two minors charged with arson, contrary to s. 1(1) and (3) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971, they emphasized on the importance of the legislative intent given to the word “reckless,” which Lord Edmund-Davies exhaustively explained in his dissenting speech in the R v Caldwell.2 In the said Caldwell decision, Lord Edmund-Davies cited the Law Commission’s Working Paper No. 31 (issued in 1970), that defined recklessness as: " A person is reckless if, (a) knowing that there is a risk that an " event...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Foundation of Criminal Law

...was not the cause, if there was some temporary loss of consciousness arising accidentally, it was reasonable to hope that it would not be repeated and that it was safe to let the acquitted man go free. If disease was the cause, the same thing might happen again, and so, although the accused was not criminally responsible, the special verdict of insanity followed by indefinite detention in [an]… asylum was the law’s solution.6 Non-insane automatism as a defense has been quite effective in the United Kingdom, completely absolving a defendant of all criminal liability provided there is solid expert evidence attesting to the claim. All the cases cited here involved non-insane automatism,...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Foundation of Criminal Law

...?Topic: Foundation of Criminal Law Affiliation: 1A Criminal acts are defined by therelevant laws that apply and provide guidance as to the process of dealing with criminal acts. Stephen and Ashuk get involved in acts that the legal system provides for as theft. Theft can occur as both intentional and unintentional, based on the context in which it occurs1. Stephen receives more change at the train station than he should have. He did not realize this till later when the train has already left. At this point, Stephen cannot be said to be dishonest, an act that would in that regard result in theft. He hurriedly received the change and...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal law foundation

...? The 4th Amendment of the US constitution protects every individual from unreasonable search and seizure while the 5th Amendment provides that the due process of law must be fair. The sixth Amendment grants every accused person the right to counsel. The 5th Amendment protects the accused against self-incrimination. Federal Courts must comply with all constitutional provisions listed in the Constitution. However, some state courts, the US Supreme court have adopted a selective basis to determine the due process of the criminal defendant while safeguarding the protected rights. Some of the protected rights include assistance of counsel, protection against self-incrimination, just and speedy trial, right to...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Criminal Law / Civil Law

...? Criminal Law: USA v. Dr. Robert W. Stokes Criminal Law: USA v. Dr. Robert W. Stokes The case against Dr. Robert stokes According to Cornell University Law School, “Criminal law involves prosecution by the government of a person for an act that has been classified as a crime” (Cornell University Law School, 2010, Para 1). In a criminal case, the government, through a prosecutor, files the case and if individuals subject to the criminal case are found guilty, they are liable for incarceration, fine payment, or both. However, in civil cases, guilty parties are liable to...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law

...Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law: Burden of Proof Criminal Justice/ Criminal Law: Burden of Proof Many are the times when peoplehave watched movies and films which dwell on criminal investigations and legal drama. In these films, the different aspects that are required for the prosecution, arraignment in court as well as sentencing of a person are brought forth. But some of the terms that are used in these films are never paid attention to and many just follow the plot. Terms such as criminal evidence, burden of proof, and innocent until proven guilty and beyond any reasonable doubt are seen as part of the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Foundation of Criminal Law for FREE!

Contact Us