Nobody downloaded yet

Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name Tutor Course Date Formal legal brief on a Tort law case Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562 (HL) Facts Mrs. Donogue went into a shop with a friend, and the friend bought Mrs. Donoghue ginger beer. Mrs. Donoghue had no contractual terms with the manufacturer since she did not purchase the beer herself…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.6% of users find it useful
Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case"

Download file to see previous pages Donoghue suffered severe gastroenteritis, shock, as a result, Mrs. Donoghue brought a claim for damages against Stevenson, and the trial judge found the action sustainable while the court of appeal overturned the decision. Mrs. Donoghue appealed to the House of Lords. Issues In this case, the issue was whether Stevenson the manufacturer of the beer owed Mrs. Donoghue who consumed the contaminated beer a duty of care. Stevenson raised an issue, where even if Mrs. Donoghueproved allegations of the consequences of the contaminated beer correct his duty of care did not extend to every consumer of the products he manufactured and for which he would not be liable. Lord Atkin stated that Mrs. Donoghue has to show that the injury resulted in breach of duty by Stevenson and in the circumstances by Stevenson to take reasonable care to prevent injury. Rules The rule applied in this case was the neighbor principle, which essentially states that if a negligence case is to be successful the proximity of the two parties that are the claimant and the defendant should not be too remote. The proximity of the defendant and the plaintiff should be that of a neighbor. To capture this position is Lord Atkin’s neighbor principle, which provides that some concept of relationship must be in existence giving rise to a duty of care. He goes ahead to state that the general rule that one loves his neighbor and one ought not to hurt his neighbor. A neighbor in this case gets a restricted response. The rule is that one should take reasonable steps to avoid acts or omissions, which are reasonably foreseeable, would be likely to injure one's neighbor. A neighbor according to Lord Atkin is anyone who is directly and, closely affected by ones act ions or omissions and one reasonably ought to have them in contemplation before doing the act or omissions in question. Analysis For an action in negligence to succeed, the plaintiff must show that there was a duty of care owed to the plaintiff by the defendant. The defendant must have breached the owed duty of care, and as a result, the plaintiff suffered damage. This duty existed prior to the case of Donoghue V Stevenson, but the duty owed was usually in sheer circumstances or proximity between the two parties. In determining the existence of a legal duty of care based on the general principle of proximity of the parties and the foresee ability of the event in question. This case provided that even in situations where the duty of care did not initially exist an individual owes a duty of care, not to harm other people who are reasonably foreseeable to be hurt by such actions. In order for the action, to succeed Mrs. Donoghue had to establish the connection between her and the manufacturer, Stevenson in relation to the negligence. The duty of care in this situation is that of an ordinary, prudent man. According to the case of Anns v London Merton Borough foresee ability is what might be reasonably expected to occur due to the actions of the defendant. The position is that liability may only arise in a case where the defendant would have foreseen the harm and avoided it. In this case, Stevenson knew that public members would consume the ginger beer and; therefore, Stevenson had a responsibility of ensuring the beer befit human consumption. The position in this case is that if a manufacturer puts a product for consumption in which the products form precludes examination ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1445645-formal-legal-brief-on-a-tort-law-case
(Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1445645-formal-legal-brief-on-a-tort-law-case.
“Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1445645-formal-legal-brief-on-a-tort-law-case.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case

Formal Legal Brief: Gray v. Reynolds

..., 2007). Issues The petitioner filed the suit against the defendant in the competent court of law to seek legal remedy. On examining the case, the trial court found ample evidence to make up it minds to conclude the case and to announce the judgment. The evidence attached with the case indicates that Gray had to pay the bill of Reynolds on weekly basis after picking up the sawdust but he did not. Review of the transactions that carried out during March 16 to April 30, 1984 justified the claim of Reynolds. From the evidence, Gray was to make payments to Reynolds. In spite of the fact that he got four loads that approximately comprised of 100 tons. See Gray...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Property Law - Formal Legal Advice

...? Property Law- Formal Legal Advice IN THE MATTER OF: RE: LEO OPINION ON BEHALF OF LEO I am asked to advise Leo as to the relevant law how best to carry out his wishes as contained in his draft will, particularly in regard to the validity of his intentions. This scenario relates to trust law that regulates the relationship of one party’s property benefitting another; the property can either be transferred from one party to benefit a third party or the legal owner may create a trust of property without necessarily transferring to a third party. THE FACTS 2. The basic facts appear as outlined. 3. Leo has drafted a will that expresses his...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Tort Law: Case Analysis

...Tort Law: Case Analysis This paper aims to provide guidance for understanding the nature of the case chosen for this assignment where one plaintiff named Jerry who was diagnosed with a think skull since childhood. As a matter of fact as evaluated in the case, Jerry has been made a patient of extreme head injuries and severe concussion by Tom who is a hockey player, the paramedical officer who provided first aid to Jerry and the surgeon who treated him carelessly. Following are the cases providing in-depth discussion regarding the types of damages that have been made to Jerry by each defendant. It should be noted that the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Tort Law Case Study

...? Tort Law Case Study Evaluation of the Potential Liability Taking the case into consideration, it has been found that the scenario involving Bobby and Rachel did not took a normal turn as there was a major implication of negligence that reflected from the part of many entities i.e. ACE Sports, the nurse, the surgeon and City General hospital. These entities had active involvement in this particular incident as all of them including Bobby were primarily involved in this catastrophic event. Also, the nurse and the surgeon had contributed towards the eventual outcome as they were involved in inappropriate treatment and surgery that Bobby underwent (Smith, 2009). ‘ACE...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Law assignment (a legal case brief assignment )

...Legal Brief of the Judgment in R v. Edwards & Others1 The appellants were convicted for murder and other offences. There were some irregularities regarding the jury on the night of 25–26 May, prior to the verdicts of the jury being returned. A juror (Juror A) had separated himself from the other members of the jury. Juror A had met four women and had also talked to Constable Stanbrooke. On the morning of 26th May, Juror A joined the other members of the Jury and took part in the deliberations. It was sought by the defendants that the jury be discharged as the provisions of law had been violated. Objections were overruled and appellants convicted. Appellants had taken a ground that the...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Business Law Case Brief

...Business Law Case Brief Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff is an investment firm called Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. The defendant is Karen Howsam who was an investment client of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. The plaintiff Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc advised Karen to invest in four limited partnerships owned by him. Facts: In 1994, Karen closed all the four accounts and moved to other investment companies. Karen claimed that Dean Witter had been issuing false information regarding the performance of the investments. When still a customer to Dean Witter, Howsam and Dean Witter had entered into an agreement that stated that any dispute arising in there dealing would ill be resolved by arbitration. Karen Howsam had a right to choose... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Formal legal brief

...Formal Legal Brief Citation Washington, et al., v. Harold Glucksberg et al., No. 96-110, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 521 U.S 702; 117 S. Ct. 2258; 117 S. Ct. 2302; 138 L. Ed. 2d 772; 1997 U.S LEXIS 4039; 65 U.S.L.W. 4669; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Service 5008; 97 Daily Journal DAR 8150; 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 190, January 8, 1997 Argued, June 26, 1997, Decided Facts According to a Washington state statute enacted in 1975, a person who aids another person to attempt suicide is guilty. In 1994, some physicians and some individuals with painful terminal illnesses brought this matter to the District Court of Western District of Washington. Their demand was that the statute should be...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Legal Brief

...Case Brief: Sony Corporation of America Et Al. v. Universal Studios, Inc., Et Al. 464 U.S. 417 (1984 Facts The case raises the question whether a company is liable for contributory copyright infringement in case the company manufactures technical devices which can be used to copy copyrighted content. Sony Corp. developed a video tape recording device known as “Betamax”. Walt Disney Company and Universal Studios understood that there could be a threat to their business and opted to file a suit against Sony Corp. for contributory copyright infringement and unfair completion under the Lamham Act. The case moved from the District Court, which ruled in favor...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Case Brief, Tax Law

...Lecturer Case Brief James O. DRUKER and Joan S. Druker, Petitioners-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 108, 115 and 116 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Facts: James O. Druker and Joan S. Druker, as plaintiffs sue the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to contest the constitutionality of the marriage penalty. After failing to file the correct and legitimate returns in 1975 and 1976, this couple argues that income tax structure is unfair and violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection. In their opinion, this was discriminatory to the working married couples like them. IRC Section 1 provides a clear guideline for...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Criminal Law Formal Legal Brief

...Stephen G. Breyer expressed dissent because he stated that strip searching individuals for minor offenses is unreasonable. He argued that only when there is reasonable suspicion by the prison official that individual might possess contrabands, than strip searching should be carried out. Comments The decision by the Court raised significant concerns among citizen interest groups that it would violate the privacy of millions of individuals. Furthermore, there were concerns that this case would lead to the violation of the Fourth Amendment principles as well as the principle of democracy and personal freedom upon which the US Constitution has been created. References Beler, Michael (2011). "Permitting Blanket Strip-Search...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Formal Legal Brief on a Tort Law Case for FREE!

Contact Us