Free

Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Strategy of the Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial No: Roll No: Date: University: Strategy of the Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial On 13 June 1994, a dog covered in blood was found by a man in Bundy Drive, West Los Angeles, a posh locality of Los Angeles…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial"

Strategy of the Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial No: Roll No: Strategy of the Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial On 13 June 1994, a dog covered in blood was found by a man in Bundy Drive, West Los Angeles, a posh locality of Los Angeles. The dog was in a restless state and brought his founder to 875 South Bundy, home of former American football player Orenthal James Simpson and spouse Nicole Brown Simpson, now taken by Nicole and their two offspring (Gilbert, 2008). On the path to the house, the corpses of a Caucasian pair were found. The body of the female belonged to Nicole Brown Simpson (35 years of age); the male’s body belonged to Ronald Lyly Goldman (25 years old), who served at the restaurant where Nicole had dinner (Gilbert, 2008). Brown Simpson and Goldman were assaulted sometime between 9:00 PM and 12:00 PM on June 12 1994. The attack was committed in front of the Brown Simpson residence, situated at 875 South Bundy Drive, Brentwood, in West Los Angeles, California. The 2 children, Justin and Sydney, aged 5 and 8 respectively, were fast asleep when the murders took place. The 2 victims were left dead in front of the house after being stabbed several times (Gilbert, 2008). The prosecution planned to use three kinds of proof so as to settle that the time span was indeed correct. First of all, they relied on the motifs, the frame of mind, manners, and the outward show. OJ was still furious about the fact that Nicole left him again. He agreed with a reconciliation he wanted almost a year prior to the murder, after the second divorce. He agreed only to be left again approximately a month before the crimes. She then forced him out of the family at the dance and dinner. Also, she returned the present he got for her birthday. At the recital, OJ was visibly upset and very reclusive because his current love interest then, Paula Barbieri, left him too. She wished to accompany him to the recital, but he turned her down. She quickly left town after this (Lange & Vannatter, 1997). After eating at McDonald’ with Kato he ineffectively tried to find her on her mobile phone, twice. 80 minutes later he left Rockingham in the Bronco. Paula was in fact stationed in Las Vegas, and was accommodated in a hotel room that Michael Bolton requisitioned. OJ displayed a cut on his left index finger that was noticed by the officers from the police station on June 13 (Lange & Vannatter, 1997). Kato and the people from the dance reported that OJ did not have this scar earlier. The physical proof consisted of a bloody Aris Isotoner glove and a ski cap, both found at the crime scene, and the pair to the glove that was found behind Simpson’s house. The material the ski cap was made from was identical with the one from the Bronco, and matched perfectly with some material found on Ron Goldman’s clothes. Also, a strand of blonde hair was found on one of the gloves, this sample of hair could originate from Nicole, and another strand of dark hair was also found. It was thought that the former came from Ron Goldman (Hunt, 1999). It was speculated that OJ, after losing the glove and cap at the crime scene, accidentally injured his left index finger. He then hurried back to his residence back in the Bronco, sloppily leaving it on Rockingham. At the time, Allan Park was waiting at the entrance of his house from Ashford Street. Simpson then planned to ditch the knife and bloody clothing. So he slipped down pathway to his house and accidentally hit an air conditioning machine that made the noises Kato Kaelin heard. He then dropped the glove and quickly entered the house. He then let Allan Park enter his household and left with him towards the airport (Moskovitz, 1995). OJ took with himself a large suitcase and a bag of golf equipment and another black golf bag that he always carried himself. The respective black bag was never seen after the incident, but the prosecutor came up with the explanation that the bag could have been taken in the garment bag when Simpson and Kardashian left Rockingham on Tuesday morning. The third set of evidence was the DNA tests completed on the samples of blood found inside the Bronco. It was revealed that they matched perfectly with those of OJ Simpson, and the late Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman (Hunt, 1999). The floor of Simpson’s bedroom beheld a sock that was stained with blood. The DNA of that blood matched exactly with that of Nicole Brown Simpson. Also, the murder scene contained another blood sample that under analysis revealed that it was the exact same match with the blood found on the Rockingham residence, and therefore belonged to the presumed murderer, OJ Simpson. These DNA tests were presented intensely to many witnesses for a long amount of time, from June to August, including Robin Cotton of Cellmark and Gary Sims, representative of the State Crime Laboratory (Shapiro & Warren, 1996). The idea of the testimony was that any other match was extremely rare. That meant that one in seven billion people had the alleles observed in the sample at the crime scene and the defendant’s own blood. The scarceness of the figures for the overall populace and other minorities, including African-Americans, was also covered by the prosecutor (Lange & Vannatter, 1997). There were a number of proofs pointing towards OJ Simpson as a murderer such as 911 call and record of Simpson’s hostility towards Nicole, hair evidence, glove evidence, DNA proof and fibre evidence. By considering all these proofs, this could not be denied that OJ Simpson was a murderer. The adopted strategy for winning the case would be presenting proofs before the judge along with witnesses to make the case strong. In addition, witty questions should be asked to make the criminal accept his guilt. References Gilbert, Mike. (2008). How I Helped O.J. Get Away With Murder: The Shocking Inside Story of Violence, Loyalty, Regret, and Remorse. Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing. Hunt, Darnell M. (1999). O. J. Simpson facts and fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lange, T. & Vannatter, P. (1997). Evidence Dismissed – The Inside Story of the Police Investigation of O.J. Simpson. New York: Pocket Books. Moskovitz, Myron. (1995). "The O.J. Inquisition: A United States Encounter with Continental Criminal Justice." Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 28. Shapiro, R. L. & Warren, L. (1996). The Search for Justice – A Defense Attorney’s Brief on the O.J. Simpson Case. New York: Warner Books. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1442332-strategy-of-jurors-for-the-oj-simpson-trial
(Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1442332-strategy-of-jurors-for-the-oj-simpson-trial.
“Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1442332-strategy-of-jurors-for-the-oj-simpson-trial.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial

The OJ Simpson Trial

...differences. Most blacks celebrated his acquittal, while majority of the white population criticized the trial. Jury selection was one of the most important parts of the Simpson case, as it created a composition of a group of individual whose great task was to hear conflicting versions and convict only if the prosecution has proved its case based “beyond reasonable doubt”. The selection of the jurors was so extensive, that it took two months to consider potential jurors. Most people believe that the jury selected played a large role in the acquittal of O.J. Simpson. Both the prosecution and the defense team tried to select the jurors...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Kant and the Simpson

...? Inserts His/her Inserts Inserts Grade Inserts Here (Day, Month, Year) Kant and the Simpsons Assurance to the act of responsibility is discussed in this article as moral goodness .It is discussed that the Simpsons can be better role models for kids than harry potter to make them realize their duties. Duty indicates two opposing sides one is our desires and the other is our goals. The fulfillment of our desires is easier than the fulfillment of our goals. The Simpsons often emphasize the clash among the goals and wishes. A lot of episodes tell us that the Simpsons are better. In “dumbbell indemnity”, Homer is shown to have the ability to rationalize his desires while...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The OJ Simpson Trial

...? Introduction In the O.J Simpson trial case, some issues are raised within the trials and these issues led millions of people around the globe to beentitled to their own opinion, personal verdict, and conclusion. The verdict of the jury was even judge by millions of people whether the case was decided based on the facts and evidences or there are occurrences of biases. O.J Simpson is considered to be one of Americans well-known personality around the globe to face the case of murder. People around the world were mesmerized and chase on the June 17, 1994 incident; the murder of Nicole Brown-Simpson, his ex-wife, and Ronald Goldman wherein...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

OJ Simpson Trail Case Analysis

...? Law: O. J. Simpson Trial Number I. Introduction The burden of proof refers to the legal obligation of the persecutor to adduce evidence in a trial, to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime(s) for which he has been charged. In the People of the State of California vs. O.J. Simpson case, the burden of proof comprised: (a) the 9-1-1 call that had been made and a history of Simpson’s violence against Nicole Brown; (b) the hair evidence which was consistent with Simpson’s hair which was found on cap at Bundy residence and on Ronald Lyle Goldman’s shirt; (c) fiber evidence in the form of cotton fiber which...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

The Trial: A History, from Socrates to O.J. Simpson

..."The Trial: A History, from Socrates to O.J. Simpson In philosophy there is a single common thread that law originates from the Gods, which is the initial point made in Kadri's The Trial. Whether one believes in God or not the fear of punishment in the name of an all powerful unknown being was set forth to create law and order in society. In the Torah this is most overtly illustrated because its purpose is to set forth the rule of law as commanded by God. The New Testament of Christianity was a progressive move from completely commanding every aspect of the individual's life to allowing rights and freedoms with the hope that humanity was more civilized. Yet, even the words of Christ in...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Glass Artist Josh Simpson

...Glass Artist Josh Simpson Josiah James Linsly Simpson, jr or Josh Simpson (born 1949) is an artist who produces marvels in glass spheres. Josh, educated in Kent School in Kent, Connecticut, later attended Hamilton College in Clinton, New York, between 1968 and 1973. It was during this period that he learned to blow glass. (Simpson Website: Timeline) He started around thirty years back by making goblets, and spent 17 years "seeking the perfect goblet."(Simpson Website: Evolution) He now lives in Massachusetts with his wife Cady Coleman, an astronaut, whose space travel also influenced his art - his best-known works are his Inhabited Planets, large spheres...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Ulysses Simpson Grant

...Ulysses S. Grant, role in the Unions Victory and rebuilding of the South Introduction Ulysses Simpson Grant was victorious war leader in the American civil war and later served for two terms as the President of the United States of America. He enjoyed much of popularity in the American public life on account of his bold performance in the battlefield and earning victory for the federal forces in the Civil War. During the course of the war, with the display of his extraordinary military knowledge and talent, he commanded the federal forces receiving frequent promotions later achieving the highest rank in the U.S. army as the supreme commander of the Union forces. He implemented strategies that mobilised the union army successfully... , and he...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

OJ Simpson's Rise to Fall

.... In fact, in interviews that followed the trial, several of the jurors even voiced their opinions that they believed Simpson had probably committed the murders but due to errors in evidence handling they had produced a verdict of innocence. Though, Simpson was found innocent in the criminal trial this was not the last time he would appear in court regarding the murders. In 1997, after being sued for damages in a civil trial by both the Brown and Goldman families, Simpson was found liable for wrongful death and was ordered to pay $33.5 million dollars to the two families. After both the criminal and civil...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

O. J. Simpson Crimial Trial

...Criminal Trial: Orenthal James Simpson The case of James Simpson was a criminal trial with the defendant being accused of murder. The victims of in this case were the defendant’s ex wife and a man who was a friend of hers. Murder is a crime punishable by life in prison or the death penalty. James Simpson, the defendant, a celebrity, was charged with killing Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown (Eliot, 1995). After a lengthy trial that spanned more than ten months, the accused person was acquitted on grounds that lab scientists had allegedly mishandled the evidence (blood samples) (Eliot, 1995). Another ground for James’ acquittal was that...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Mock trial

... Davis vs. HappyLand Toy Company Strategy that plaintiffs would use in the jury selection process Andrea Davis should establish a common bond with each member of the juror (Tarr 128). The strategy would establish rapport with the jurors so that when they look at Andrea, they will see something that defines their lives. Andrea and the three attorneys should take advantage of the questionnaires given by the court to learn about the details of each member of the jury. The plaintiff will get information about the jury members that they will make them give verdict in favor of Andrea. Some of the members have had unsatisfactory experiences with the large corporations such as HappyLand while others have had a loss of a kid. Questions... for...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial for FREE!

Contact Us