Nobody downloaded yet

Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The creation of a Supreme Court was an unnecessary and overly-expensive reform. The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords was independent, effective and was regarded as one of the finest courts in the world.’  Discuss. The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: Unnecessary and Costly Reform or Idea Whose Time Has Come?…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.5% of users find it useful
Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom"

Download file to see previous pages Some critics have scorned this latest legal development as a cosmetic change that will burden the nation’s coffers, whilst some fear that it would lead to an American-style assertiveness wherein “the new top court will trump the role of legislators” (Bryan-Low and Bravin, 2009). Yet, there are many who laud it as a democratic development that will be in sync with modern politics and its plethora of challenges. This paper will evaluate the debate and determine whether or not the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom was a step in the right direction. It will argue that rather than being an unnecessary and overly-expensive reform, it actually is a legal innovation that must be lauded. This paper argues in the main that the creation of the Supreme Court is in sync with the time-honoured principle of separation of powers, and that this separation of powers is a way by which the judiciary can check on the parliament and counter possible abuses by the legislature and the executive. It then proceeds to make the point that it is in keeping with our commitment to human rights as a member of the European Union that a Supreme Court that is not attached to the parliament is an absolute imperative. Though the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords was indeed independent, effective and well-regarded, the demands of the present time are far different from the past and now more than ever, it becomes imperative that the judiciary not only be independent, but also appear independent. Separation of Powers The doctrine of separation of powers is a time-honoured doctrine in a democratic polity. This doctrine proposes that the state is divided into three co-equal branches: the executive, legislative and the judiciary, with each branch acting as “check and balance” against the possible excesses of the other. According to American scholar Malcolm Sharp, “the fear of power concentrated in the hands of a single class or group has, among other things, influenced the doctrine of the separation of powers among the various organs of government.”1 In the United Kingdom, however, this doctrine had not been followed. The members of the executive is drawn up from the Parliament, and in the Lord Chancellor (a position that dates back all the way to the 7th century) is reposed the three arms of the state, in that he is a Cabinet minister, a member of the House of Lords and the head of the Judiciary. However, many quarters felt that as long as the system was working, there was no need to change it or to hew closer to American counterparts. And certainly, there were mechanisms within the state to ensure judicial independence. For example, judges of the high court cannot be removed from office without an address that was passed by both Houses of Parliament. It is also exceedingly complex (and deliberately so) to sue or prosecute a judge for functions related to handing down decisions. Be that as it may, the demands of modern governance require that judges be independent from the executive. This independence certainly does not mean an uncoordinated bureaucracy, or a chaotic structure with no clear harmonised policy. Severing the nexus or removing the overlap between judicial functions and parliamentary functions does not, after all, mean keeping both bodies in blinders, oblivious to the needs of the country. It only means creating a separate office with distinct responsibilities. The first reason is that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Essay”, n.d.)
Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Essay. Retrieved from
(Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Essay)
Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Essay.
“Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

The United Kingdom Supreme Court: A Physical Transparency of Independence

...was to maintain impartiality, as the Law Lords were somehow, less understood by the public to be a separate entity from the House of Lords. The attempt to create a separate judiciary is to give more credibility to the judgments and decisions made without political influence. But the separation of judicial functions of the House of Lords with a new Court is rather a change in form than in substance, as the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom lacks the power of judicial review to annul acts of the legislature that are incompatible with the Constitution. The Controversy The issue of judicial independence was discussed in the case of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

United States Court System

...? United s Court System Research Paper of The American court system is usually called an ‘adversarial system’ because justice can be attained when lawyers stand for competing legal groups—the defense and the prosecution—vying in court to establish the facts and come up with the most fair decision. The adversarial system is rooted in the doctrine of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ (May et al., 2007, 159). The U.S. court system is clearly different from the inquisitorial system adopted in most European and Latin American nations, where the defendant is presumed guilty and should establish his/her innocence to the court (Neubauer & Fradella, 2010, 53). In spite of the belief that the adversarial system is a contest between two rivals... that...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

United States Supreme Court

...The United s' Supreme Court acts as a check for the legislative and executive branches of government as acts as the country's highest platform for not only judicial but also political resolution. Thus, it is natural that an appointment to become a Supreme Court justice is of public interest, if not concern. The interest in the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court by President Barrack Obama garnered more than its share of scrutiny. However, there are some opinion that the hesitation stems from Sotomayor's gender and race being a Latina. The attention was not just due to her skills and experience to take up...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

United States Supreme Court

...($39,000) is less than the debt’s amount. The question presented is whether a debtor can “strip down” the lien of the creditor on the real property pledged as collateral for the debt to the value of the collateral; more specifically, the United States Supreme Court was asked to determine the applicability of section 506(d) to this particular set of circumstances. For the reasons discussed below, the Court held that section 506(d) did not allow the debtor to “strip down” the lien. As an initial matter, the Court admits that section 506(d) is ambiguous, that both parties have made valid points, but that sound policy and harmonization of the modern Code...
2 Pages(500 words)Article

Supreme Court

...thoughts about whether the juvenile should be given the death sentence, highlighting the strong division in the country about what to do with juvenile violent crime offenders. It appears that Powers believes that many of the failures of todays children in these affluent neighborhoods stems from parental complacency and an inability to address that violence and teenage angst occurs routinely regardless of their state of origin. Powers, it appears, believes that most of the fault lies with those who are in charge for their failures in molding positive childhood behaviors. In reference, specifically, to the New Hampshire murders, it seems that Powers is linking their murderous intentions with failure of parents to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

United States Supreme Court Case

...Case American Elec. Power CO. v. CONNECTICUT, No. 10-174 . The Supreme Court ruling and its effects on the future of greenhouse gas emissions aimed at protecting the environment. Citation: Supreme Court of the United States, cited on the 21st November, 2011 from: The facts The state of Connecticut has sought to curb the carbon gases emission citing that it was a nuisance to the public thus having drastic effects on business and employment in the electric power companies. The effects are drastic as a result of the increased global warming that has led to environmental destruction. The resolving of the...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court Opinions The principle responsibility of the U.S. Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. It has thefinal say in settling legal arguments and determining the meaning of laws thereby setting national policy. The Justices write majority and minority opinions following a decision. These fall into four categories, unanimous, divided, very divided and per curium. Unanimous decisions are written when all nine members of the court vote the same way. The Chief Justice (John Roberts) assigns any Justice the task of writing it or may choose himself. Sometimes, if the case has many nuances involved, he may have opinions from...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...from how it had been allow people from same sex to enjoy certain rights and privileges which they were deprived of earlier. It therefore means that, after the issue being contested in the Supreme Court for Nine Circuits, the court finally found no reason for depriving people of same sex their right to marry (Adam, 2013). This decision was based on the non-originalist view that looked into the other precedents keenly to allow the constitution make amendments in favor of those who wanted to have same sex marriages. References Adam, L. (2013, June 26). Supreme Court Bolsters Gay Marriage With Two Major Rullings. The New York Times...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Supreme Court

... of their human rights to liberty and security being violated unapologetically. Work Cited Alonso, Karen. Korematsu V. United States: Japanese-American Internment Camps. California: Enslow, 2009. Lewis, Thomas. U. S. Court Cases. New York: Salem Press incorporated, 2010. Miller, Frederic, Agnes Vandome and John McBrewster. Korematsu V. United States. New York: Alphascript Publishing, 2009.... Supreme Court case of Korematsu v. U.S Complaint The complaint in this case was that Korematsuwho was an American of Japanese descent was wrongfully evicted from his location to an internment camp. He complained that this violated his constitutional rights and hence refused to move as the order requested. This led...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

.... Americans uses federalism in governing the Americans using the state laws , federal laws, and local government laws. Federalism has changed greatly in the course of the American history these changes include, eliminating the confederation articles and giving the federal laws supremacy over the state laws (R. Dye, Zeigler and Schubert). CONCLUSION Conclusion the , the supreme court has played a great role in advancing the Americans rights and freedoms over the last six years . These includes legalizing same sex marriages which is in accordance with the bill of rights of the American constitution. REFERENCES R. Dye, Thomas, Harmon Zeigler, and Loius Schubert. Irony Of Democracy. Print.... DD Month YYYY ESSAY POLITICAL SCIENCE...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Legal System: The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom for FREE!

Contact Us