Nobody downloaded yet

Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name: Institution: CONTRACTS OF LAW: CASE BETWEEN KEITH AND JOHN When a mistake, which considered, to be grave by the law happens to entered into a contract then, the contract is deemed as void (Burrows 2011). Thus, a mistake in English contract law can be further described as an incorrect understanding when entering into a contract by one or more parties…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98% of users find it useful
Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John"

Download file to see previous pages In the case of John and Keith, Keith had no information that John did not have a valid driving licence free of endorsement. John, on the other hand, had entered into a contract with Keith, and he had sold him the car. Therefore, it was Keith’s responsibility to ensure that John had a valid driving licence free of endorsement. Another problem appears Keith and John were at consensus ad idem at the time of entering into the contract. Did John enter into the contract ready to cheat Keith into it? John, on the other hand, may have not thought that a valid driving license free of endorsement was immensely beneficial. This was because Keith showed no interest in the verification of the license. However, an argument can be presented that John was fraudulent and made Keith believe that he had a valid driving license when in reality he did not own one. In a case of a contract like this, the contract is void for the mistake. It is also of paramount importance to note that such a distinction depends only on the manner into which the contract was made (P Atiyah and F Bennion 1961). A contract made face to face, like that of Keith and John, has a strong presumption which is commonly inferred by courts that the seller always intends to contract with the customer. Therefore, in this situation of Keith and John it was much harder for John to get the insurance cover without giving fraudulent information. This principle can be further demonstrated in the case of Philip v Brooks (J Cartwright 1987). In this case, a man named Mr. North fraudulently claims to be Sir George Bollough and purchases a ring from Mr. Phillips; later North sells the ring to Brooks Ltd. However, the check of North is dishonored, and Phillips sues Brook ltd (E. Allan Farnsworth 2010). This is another case of misrepresentation Brooks Ltd. Do not have any knowledge of where the ring came from, and the same applies to Keith. Therefore, Keith is not aware of the Motives of John and just like Brooks could have done nothing to it. John has also the benefit of consensus ad idem. At the time of contract, both parties were in agreement and thus, further change to the contract later was a breach of contract and john can sue Keith for it. Therefore, Keith did not re- affirm the old idea of caveat emptor and, therefore, the contract was in a principle and thus, no ground for rescission of the contract. John may have also confused and thought that his driving license was valid. This would in turn mean that this was mistake of fact which is a defense in criminal law (Treitel 2011). This is regardless of whether it is reasonable or not. It is in this light that John may argue he had the notion that what he was doing was not criminal. In the case of the Lewis vs. Averay, Lewis sells a car to a person who claimed to be Richard Greene, with a Cheque (450) which later is dishonored the fraudulent person then sells the car to Averay (200) (P Atiyah and F Bennion 1961). The contract according to me is void, and John should be sued for breach of contract. In accordance to the laws of contract, when one is entering into a contract he should disclose all relevant issues pertinent to the contract (Ubberima fides) (Epstein 2005). Therefore, John did not consider the principle of utmost good faith when entering into the contract and gave false ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John Essay)
“Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John

Scot's Law of Contracts prove that a contract existed between Arju and that customer. Additionally, she cannot claim that in court of law as ultimately, she would have to prove that a legally binding contract did indeed exist between her and the customer. The Scottish Law of Contracts requires that consensus in idem be reached. This means that regardless of the means that the contract was formed, there must be a consensus that was reached by the parties. It is possible for the parties in a contract to think that they have come to a consensus only for the court to overturn that belief. This is so especially...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Construction Contracts Law

...and are not hereby expressly declared to be void. In nut shell the essentials needed for a valid contract, therefore, are as under : An agreement between the two parties. An agreement is the result of a proposal or an offer by one party followed by its acceptance by the other. Agreement should be between the parties who are competent to contract. There should be a lawful consideration and lawful object in respect of that agreement. There should be free consent of the parties, when they enter in to the agreement. The agreement must not be one, which has been expressly declared to be void. A proposal, when accepted, results in an...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Company Law contracts

...Topic: Company Law Style: Harvard Preferred language style: English (U.K Answer: In order to answer this question it is necessary to know about the term of promoter. Although the Companies Act 1985 does not define the term promoter, the judges have framed tests for determining whether a person's activities relate to the promotion of a company. A promoter is a person responsible for forming a company whether or not a person is a promoter is a question of fact to be determined according to the role he played in the creation of the company. The steps as a whole involve- a) Registering the company with companies house, b) Entering into pre- Incorporation contracts, c) In case o public...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Elizabeth Keith

.... In 1924 Elizabeth returned to England. Here he tarted learning color etching. Elizabeth wa back in Aia and Japan from 1932 to 1933 and again in 1935. In 1936 and 1937 he had exhibition in the UA. With World War II on the horizon, Elizabeth omehow got mentally caught between Eat and Wet. In 1956, the year of her death, he had a olo exhibition in Tokyo with 59 woodblock print and 8 color etching. Elizabeth Keith print are both rare and expenive. Price tart at around U$1,000. The reaon i imple. The number of printed copie were mall. At lifetime he could not ell higher edition. ome of her print were publihed in number of only 30 or 50 copie. Her portfolio conit of more than hundred woodblock print and about...
10 Pages(2500 words)Personal Statement

Employment Law - Employment Contracts

...Employment Law - Employment Contracts Employment law covers a certain nature and scope of the employment contract. The purpose of this paper is to;using case studies, explain the sources, institutions, and enforcements systems for individual employment rights. This will be accomplished through the use of case studies; the nature and scope of the contract will be discussed and the content and case study examples will explain the sources, institutions and enforcement systems for individual employment rights. The Sources, Institutions and Enforcement Systems for Individual Employee Rights Organized labor...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

E-Law, Jurisdictions, Contracts

.... Therefore, when it comes to the issue of contracts entered into over the Internet, many of the common law practices already in existence will apply, since the exchange of the contract letter over the Internet via e-mail, etc may be equated to an exchange of a similar document through conventional methods like the Fax or post. In this context, the case of Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd , Mason CJ, Gaudron JJ, Deanne and Dawson stated that “an act passes across space or time before it is completed. Communicating by letter, telephone, telex and the like provide examples.”5 Therefore, a statement could originate in one place but be directed towards a recipient in...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Commercial law ( commercial contracts )

...which cancels the original offer. A contract is said to be formed only if such counter-offer is accepted. Commercial Contracts –Does it truly mirror the intention of the parties? The common practice is that until acceptance is conveyed to the offeror, it is not valid. Some exceptions in this regard are a) if the offeror has waived the requisite for communication b) when acceptance is communicated by post, it will be effective on posting. Communication sent through fax, telephone, computer, telex or fax is not effective until received by the offeror. Moreover, it is arduous to find when exactly a telex, fax, a message left on a telephone answering machine or e-mail message is actually “received.” Decided...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Contracts Law

...Law of Contract A contract delineates an agreement between two or more parties, which is enforceable by the law. Thus, a substantial number of contracts are guided on the basis of common law. Conversely, the UCC’s article 2 governs contracts involving sale of goods, negotiable instruments and secured transactions. Incidentally, there are two types of contacts: written and oral. Nevertheless, more than often, a contract has to be in written form, for it to be legally enforced. Furthermore, it is expected that all the terms and conditions of a contract should be fulfilled...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Construction Contracts in Context

...Legal and Contractual Issues SECTION A contract is a legal binding or agreement between two parties. All the parties in an agreement have a control. The law provides rights for all contracts. A good contract should be legally accepted. A legal contract is easily protected with the government in case of any issues during the creation process or after breakage. All parties entering a contract must be able to access their benefits before signing1. They should ensure that they are satisfied before entering. All the people involved in a contract have a chance to speak out in order to...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Difference between void contracts and voidable contracts

...Differences between Void Contracts and Voidable Contracts I.D. of the Differences between Void Contracts and VoidableContract Void Contract In most simple terms, a void contract can be defined as: “A contract having no legal force or binding effect” (Cross and Miller 2011, p. 752). So a void contract is no contract at all. According to Schaffer, Agusti, and Earle (2008), there are four essential elements of a contract as per the common law requirements. First, mutual assent on the part of the contracting parties is...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Contracts of Law:Case Between Keith and John for FREE!

Contact Us