Nobody downloaded yet

The United States vs Jones - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name Instructor Task Date United States vs. Jones In the case, the use of GPS in the vehicle of drug dealer leading to his interdiction together with 97 kilos of cocaine and money amounts to $800,000 in a stash building (Totenberg). According to the case, Jones was the owner while the manager was Maynard in a club in Columbia…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
The United States vs Jones
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The United States vs Jones"

Download file to see previous pages However, arguments emerged because the court used evidence from wiretaps, search incidences on traffic stop as well as placement of GPS on Jones vehicle for 4weeks until his interdiction (Totenberg). With respect to the law, these were a violation of the right of an individual. The argument by Jones seems realistic since indeed the FBI violated his right in respect to the legal law on the fourth amendment (Totenberg). The police ought to acquire a warrant prior to the placement of any tracking devices on a suspect to ensure that the laws are not violated. The police have the obligation to keep law and order and should therefore serve as examples to the public. In attaching any tracking devices to a suspect’s vehicle, it becomes a violation of law and action should be taken against the police officers who do not pursue protocol. According to the fourth amendment, liberties that are liberty to privacy and liberty to privacy from arbitrary invasion are protected. It states that a search should be carried out when one violates a sensible anticipation of privacy while a seizure is the hindrance with an individual possessory concern in possessions. A person usually is seized if the police or any enforcement personnel use force to restrain a person that is if it seems reasonable in a similar situation. The law enforcement workforce are however restricted from any irrational searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment outlaws indiscriminate searches, except unusual situations place the community in danger. The claimant ought to contain a justifiable expectation of confidentiality at the searched locality. This expectation must meet up mutually the subjective and objective assessment of rationality. The subjective assessment needs the claimant to anticipate privacy legitimately, and the objective assessment entail that, given the circumstance, a rational person in a comparable situation also would have anticipated privacy. Order to keep away from illegitimately searching or seizing possessions, law enforcement officeholder normally acquire warrant. They must demonstrate probable reason, supported by pledge or affirmation, and express in specify the place they will investigate and the things they will confiscate. A judge may possibly find apparent reason only by probing the entirety of the situation. According to an oral argument by Michael R. Dreeben on behalf of the petitioner, in the utilization of GPS and wiretaps in thecae of Jones, it is a violation of the fourth amendment while in the case of Knotts, the fourth amendment was not infringed because the police used visual and beeper to survey him. Michael argues with Dreeben on various cases in which the police did not infringe the laws in support of the petitioner. The oral argument provides the various instances in which the police have managed to interdict suspects without the violation of the fourth amendment. The oral argument presents various issues concerning the fourth amendment and its implementation within law enforcement organizations. In the oral argument, Dreeben suggests that the court should institute a suspicion standard, which enables the police to follow suspects on public roadways, and allow them to conduct visually, as well as allow them to investigate leads and tips if the circumstances have no possible cause (Alderson 26). Dreeben also suggested that the police should probably use the GPS during the early periods of any investigation that is before ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The United States vs Jones Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
The United States vs Jones Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1438715-the-united-states-v-jones
(The United States Vs Jones Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
The United States Vs Jones Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1438715-the-united-states-v-jones.
“The United States Vs Jones Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1438715-the-united-states-v-jones.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The United States vs Jones

United States vs. Afghanistan

...?US Airways is in the process of launching a global expansion plan. As a company that is now open to the international marketplaces the firm has to consider opportunities in different types of economies. Third world countries are part of potential travel destinations that can increase the revenue stream of the firm. The reason that a third world country can become a viable business opportunity for an airline is due to the reduce competition in the airline industry in those marketplaces. A potential expansion location in for US Airways in a third world country is Afghanistan. This paper provides an economic analysis of Afghanistan comparing it with the United States. Afghanistan is located in the Middle...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

United States vs Recio

...? United s vs Recio, (01-1184) 537 U.S. 270 (2003) due United s vs. Recio, (01-1184) 537 U.S. 270 (2003) This was a conspiracy case in which the plaintiff was the United States government and the defendants were, Francisco Jimenez Recio and Adrian Lopez Meza on similar charges. In this case, it happened that a truck, carrying illegal drugs to be distributed was intercepted by police and stopped. The two drivers help the police arrest two other individuals, Recio and Meza, the defendants in this case. The two truck drivers are found in possession of the illegal drugs together with Recio and Meza who come for the drugs, rounded up and charged with conspiracy to commit a criminal offence of distributing illegal drugs (www.oyez.org... is the...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Abramski vs. United States

...?Abramski v. United s Abramski v. United s Introduction A former police officer, Mr. Abramski bought and legally transferred a firearm to his elderly uncle for self defense. Abramski purchased the gun at a local gun dealer at a discount since was a former police officer. During the purchase process, Mr. Abramski passed all the federal requirements laid down at the store; therefore, he bought the gun successfully from another store in Pennsylvania. It should be noted that it is at this gun store at Pennsylvania that the gun was transferred to the uncle after he (the uncle) successfully passed the federal background check for the firearm position. Neither the two were prohibited by the law to possess a...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

United States vs Burke case

...tells the police officers that the woman is Linus's sister. Lucy. PO Brown asks Lucy if Linus keeps drugs and guns in the house. Lucy says, "I never saw any guns or drugs." PO Schroeder says, "So if I looked around I wouldn't find anything illegal here" Lucy tells him that would be true. The police officers then remove the cushions from the couch and find two .38 caliber revolvers. They open a hallway closet and find three bags of cocaine hidden under some sheets and towels. Linus returns home and he and his sister are arrested. The defendants make a motion to suppress the evidence recovered from the apartment. Discuss the search and seizure issues involved and decide the motion. In United States v...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Olmstead vs. United States

...Olmstead vs. United s---Legal case Case Basics Petitioner.............Olmstead Respondent.........United s of America Docket Number....493Decidecd by .........Taft court (1925-30) Court case and opinion... 227 US 438(1928) Date of argument..............20th. Feb, 1928, Monday Decided on.........................4th. June, 1928, Monday Categories for discussion....Privacy, searches and seizures, jurisdiction, fourth amendment, Federal courts, self incrimination and wiretapping etc......(1) Mr. John F. Dore argued for petitioners and the Attornety General of United States along with Mr. Michael J. Doherty argued on behalf of United...
4 Pages(1000 words)Term Paper

United States Vs. India

...Running Head: US INDIA United s VS India and Section # of United s VS India India is a developing country whereas the US being a developed country is the superpower of the world. The purpose of this assignment is to compare India to the US in terms of unemployment and inflation, the general economy and the banking system. Unemployment and Inflation The labor force in India is growing at a rate of 2.5% per year but employment opportunities are only growing at a rate of 2.3%. India faces a massive problem of unemployment as the population base is in billions but the jobs available are limited to thousands. Automation and computerization has led to technology unemployment...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

United States vs. Antoine Jones

...to any drug safe houses. After collecting the surveillance data and information, the agents obtained an arrest warrant for Jones, and found a significant amount of cocaine and other Drug paraphernalia in Jones’ possession. (Bill Mears, "Justices rule against police") United States vs. Antoine Jones is a case that looks at the government’s ability to conduct warrantless GPS tracking, in the case of a suspected criminal vehicle. The case looks into partial elements of the fourth amendment, and the case would have an impact on cases that related to the use of technological advances in investigations and the techniques used by the police...
4 Pages(1000 words)Article

United States Vs. Afghanistan

...United States Vs. Afghanistan Introduction It is commonly believed that prisoners in US have rights. These rights were awarded to them by the criminal justice system of the US, but these rights are not provided without efforts made by those stakeholders who are being affected by prisons of US. The policy makers of Bill of Rights state that prisoners have been given rights without any demands and protests, reality is that people had to suffer a great deal to obtain these rights. Even when rights were given after several years of protests, attempts were made to abolish them through new rules and regulations. For example, after 9/11 President of the United...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

United States police vs Brazilian police

...Law United s Police vs. Brazilian Police Police are principally tasked with law enforcement and maintaining order. Democracy goes in hand with law enforcement, and proper law enforcing attitudes results in a democratic state. Policing presents different effects in diverse regions depending on the understanding the masses have with its authorities. There are differences that exist within countries in terms of policing and law enforcement depending on state regulations. There is a social trust that exists between citizens and police departments that must be upheld to promote egalitarianism and trust. In both the US and Brazil, police are tasked with arresting, searching,...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

United States v. Jones

...United s v. Jones In the fourth amendment of US constitution, unreasonable searches and seizures against an individual are prohibited and require the judicial sanction of warrants before searches, seizures are initiated, and there must be a probable cause to effect the same (Wetterer 24). Under the amendment, searches and seizure warrants are limited depending on the information made available to the court issuing the search and seizure warrants by an officer, who swears by the same (Wetterer 78). Aspects based on the fourth amendment forms the basis for the case between United States versus Jones. In the making of court decisions involving the fourth...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The United States vs Jones for FREE!

Contact Us