Nobody downloaded yet

Microsoft versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This case study discusses the situation between Microsoft and the European Union is the result of the claims raised by the European Union against Microsoft regarding its anti-competitive behavior. The study analyses the view of Microsoft’s position from the general theoretical perspective…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
Microsoft versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Microsoft versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage"

Download file to see previous pages  The case is related to the competitive practices of power that is or can be utilized by the company. This case is held by the European Commission belonging to the European Union. The case is held against the company, Microsoft which is accused of mistreating its leading market position. The company was held guilty by the European Commission, according to the competition law. The European Commission put forward their argument that Microsoft was misusing their power of monopoly for the sale of operating systems of Personal Computers (PCs). The company was held guilty on the basis of two grounds, firstly Microsoft was accused of intentionally restricting interoperability between Windows PCs and other non-Microsoft workgroup servers, and secondly the step it had taken in relation to tying its Windows Media Player with its mostly used Windows Operating System. Tying the product, Windows Media Player with the Windows Operating System was the step adopted by Microsoft to avoid the competition for the product (CentrePiece, 2007). The European Commission, after five years of intense investigation, held the company to be guilty as these practices of business in gaining competitive advantages in the market were considered as unfair and illegal means as stated by the Article 82 of European Union Law. The fine penalized to the company was considered to be the largest amount ever charged for such an act of an antitrust violation in Europe i.e. €497 million (CentrePiece, 2007). The case commenced in the month of December of the year 1998, with the complaint stated by the company, Sun Microsystems and ended with the decision given by the European Commission in March of the year 2004 (Microsoft, 2011). In addition to the penalty implemented, the Commission also insisted on major solutions, which included mandatory licensing of intellectual property. The initiatives taken by the European Union demanded that Microsoft needs to reveal the entire documentation interface within the time period of 120 days, with accurate data. This step was taken with an intention to permit other non-Microsoft workgroup servers to gain full interoperability with Microsoft’s Windows PCs and servers. Another step adopted by the European Union (EU), provided Microsoft a limit of 90 days, within which the company was supposed to offer the personal computer manufactures a version of its Windows client PC operating system without the Windows Media Player. Again, on January 15 of the year 2009, the European Union stated new objections to the company, delineating the initial view of the European Commission that Microsoft is tying its web browser ‘Internet Explorer’ to its central operating system. Microsoft overruled the European Commission Treaty rules, as stated by Article 82 on misuse of the leading position in the market by the company and has tried to eliminate the competition based on the qualities among the competing companies dealing with web browsers (The United States Department of Justice, 2005)   For more than a couple of decades, Microsoft has been considered to be a company which has been vigorously involved in designing extremely successful campaigns with an intention to sustain and extend further its monopolies in the existing markets. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(Microsoft versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Case Study, n.d.)
Microsoft versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Case Study. Retrieved from
(Microsoft Versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Case Study)
Microsoft Versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Case Study.
“Microsoft Versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Case Study”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Microsoft versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage

Microsoft vs. European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage

...?Microsoft vs. European Union: Anti-competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage? By Microsoft vs. European Union: Anti-competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage? Introduction The theoretical basis of anti-competitive behaviour is to support the contention that consumers benefit from having choices among products on the market and competition is good for creativity and innovation (Canetti, 2004)....
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Microsoft versus European Union - Anti Competitive Behavior or Competitive Advantage

...?Introduction The concept of anticompetitive behavior and competitive advantage among businesses is one that is defined specifically with components that are a part of each business and the regulations which are followed. In the case of the European Union vs. Microsoft, there was a specific allegation that Microsoft held a competitive advantage over other competitors, leading to a monopoly within an international framework. In the case that followed in 2004, there was the decision that Microsoft needed to disclose information that would allow rival vendors to interoperate with Windows. The decision was followed with the understanding that the information should be non – discriminatory and reasonable for vendors to understand... measures...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

AMD vs Intel - Anti Competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage intending to have an unfair competition in the computer product market. It further alleged that Intel has been offering rebates to Japanese manufacturers of Personal Computers. Due to the offered rebates to PC manufacturers, the manufacturers agreed not to purchase the Pc products of AMD (Hitt et al., 2009, pp. 41-50). In 2005, the allegations were made by AMD in a way that Intel was pressuring the computer manufacturers by offering them money to boycott the products of AMD. Therefore, in such situation Intel seems to break the laws of national and international competition. As the purpose of competition, law is to promote and sustain the business competition in a...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Competitive Advantage

... and relationships across traditional boundaries. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Porter, M. E. (2004). Competitive advantage. New York, NY: Free. Sims, R. R. (2003). Ethics and corporate social responsibility: Why giants fall. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. Versaevel, B., & European University Institute. (2007). Production and organisational capabilities. Florence: European University Institute, Economics Dept. Whitley, R. (2007). Business systems and organisational capabilities: The institutional structuring of competitive competences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.... Competitive Advantage Introduction Comprehending the concept of competitive...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Competitive Advantage retaining and attracting new customers to the business a thing that has seen it gaining more competitive advantage over its production rivals Conclusion Both the companies have got various sources of obtaining competitive advantages over their business rivals some of which are very different while others are closely related as discussed in this paper. These have made the two companies to be market leaders in their line of product production. References Berry, L. and Parasuraman, A. (1991), Marketing Services: Competing through Quality, the Free Press, New York, Bloemer, J. and De Ruyter, K. (1998), "On the relationship between store image, store satisfaction and...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Competitive advantage

...Introduction Organizations around the world have been devising and implementing numerous strategies for decades in order to gain competitive advantage in their line of operations. Some of these strategies involve integration of their operations pertaining to the supply chain. In so doing the organization tries to look into the costs it incurs in the whole production process and the amount of control it has over each and every process. When considering vertical integration strategy for example, an organization looks into managing its supply chain from both the supplier’s and the client’s sides (Ellram 1991). This is a trend that is popular mostly with retailers who wish to control both ends of their...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Competitive Advantage

...Competitive Advantage Affiliation: Factor Tim’s Coffee Shoppe Competitor Queequeg’s Coffee) Competitor 2 (Tim Hortons) Score Comments Score Comments Score Comments Quality 3 Minor strength 3 Minor strength 4 Major strength Location 4 Major strength 3 Minor strength 3 Minor strength Employees 2 Minor weakness 2 Minor weakness 3 Minor strength Profitability 2 Minor weakness 2 Minor weakness 3 Minor strength Product 4 Major strength 2 Minor weakness 3 Minor strength Price 1 Major weakness 2 Minor weakness 2 Minor weakness Service 3 Minor strength 3 Minor strength 3 Minor strength Advertising 2 Minor weakness 3 Minor strength 4 Major strength Total 21 20 25 1 – Major weakness, 2 – Minor...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Competitive Advantage

...Competitive advantage It is the desire of every company or organization to the on top of its game in all areas. This is better termed as competitive advantage and its entails a company having pool of dynamic skills, strengths and abilities that will propel it far above its competitors. In addition to being the very best in the industry, some companies find it more appropriate to differentiate their products and services from those of other companies (Pearce & Robinson, 2012). In an effort to create an edge in competitive advantage, it is advisable to factor in all areas such as cost, differentiation and speed (Pearce & Robinson, 2012)....
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Competitive Advantage

...Barnes & Noble is the industry leader in the book industry. The company generated $7.13 billion in sales in (Barnesandnobleinc, . The organization holds various competitive advantages over a small bookstore. As a public company whose stocks are traded in the New York Stock Exchange Barnes & Noble has greater access to capital than small bookstores. The firm has the ability to raise capital through the sale of stocks and bonds. The company also has a superior marketing and advertising budget which has enabled Barnes & Noble the ability to build brand value. Barnes & Noble has the greatest product variety in the industry in both books and e-books. Due to the size of the company the firm is in a better position to offer lower prices... & Noble...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Competitive advantage

...COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE THROUGH E-COMMERCE LOGISTICS al Affiliation) Key words: Comparative Advantage Study All statistical surveying reports demonstrate a consistent, critical increment of online deals at the cost of conventional disconnected from the net retail. Satisfaction of online requests, in any case, is testing. With a CATELOG concentration in logistics, open doors that can help increment online deals in a productive way will be mandatory. Three angles are fundamental to the task: Cross-fringe retail logistics (Abnamro 2011). While online channels have no fringes and take into consideration snappy global extension, shopper inclination for sorts of e-satisfaction is prone to contrast crosswise...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Proposal
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Microsoft versus European Union: Anti Competitive Behaviour or Competitive Advantage for FREE!

Contact Us