Nobody downloaded yet

Of self-defence case - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name: Course: Tutor: Date: Self-defense 1) What is the government's point of view? According to the state vs. Appellant Johnny Rufus Belcher, the government finds Belcher guilty and thus liable to face murder charge. With the circumstances, surrounding the murder act notwithstanding, then the fact is that Belcher maimed Suber intentionally…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Research of self-defence case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Of self-defence case"

Download file to see previous pages The government view is that, after Belcher confronted Suber, he went ahead, retrieved a gun from Brown and began shooting Suber with no excuse. the state affirms that the killing has to be unlawful and thus instructs the jury that the malice be inferred for the use of the deadly weapon (California Center for Research and Education in Government 86). The states stress that courts have been bestowed powers to settle fixtures in the criminal systems of the company. 2) What is the prosecutor's point of view? From the prosecutor’s point of view, Belcher is guilty and has two counts of charges to answer. One of the charges is that Belcher committed murder while the second one is the possession of the illegal firearm. The prosecutor finds sufficient evidence to believe that Belcher committed the heinous act, it is for this reason that the prosecutor instructs the jury to convict Belcher for murder and the illegal possession of the firearm. The prosecutor refers the charges with respect to Belcher’s murder reiterating that his act contravenes the state law regarding human conduct. According to the prosecutor, Murder is the unlawful killing with malice, which may be inferred by the deadly weapons or from the circumstances that may be proved by the state. According to the prosecutor, the law presumes malice from the homicide and therefore Belcher is guilty of the offense. However, the prosecutor does not take the step of prosecuting Belcher. In his response to the judgment of the jury that warrants the jury to charge Belcher for murder and voluntary manslaughter, the prosecutor finds the inference of malice regarding the use of the deadly weapon as no longer being a good law in South Carolina. He therefore makes a ruling that Belcher’s convictions be reversed and remand for a new trial to begin. The prosecutor arrives at this verdict owing to the conflicting testimonies presented at the pretrial chamber. 3) What is the element of the crime? The elements of the crime are the use of the deadly weapon and malice. However, the evidence of self-defense and malice are presented with respect to this case. The evidence of malice in this case is evidenced by Belcher’s use of handgun. It is however, perceived that the notion of charging malice by the use of the deadly weapon is harmless. This makes the case complicated. 4) What is the issue inference, Mens Rea, Actus Res, or Presumptuous? The issue inference here is the Suber’s murder subject to malice. Belcher portrays the Actus reas in his submission of evidence when he states that, his decision to shoot Suber was an attempt to defend him (West Publishing Company 270). The evidence provided is presumptuous and thus fail to catch the prosecutor’s admissibility. It is therefore, upon the jury’s decision to make valid ruling regarding the pursuance of justice. It is important to note that presumption is not applicable when the circumstances and facts related to the homicide are disclosed in evidence in a manner that it draws a conclusion of malice. Presumptions are used as substitutes when theirs is a lack of direct proof. In Belcher’s case, presumption is employed owing to lack of sufficient evidence. 5) What was the previous Law? It emerges that the prosecution embraced the Bishop criminal law previously. Subject to this law, the inference of malice was drawn from the use of deadly weapons especially in the act of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Research of self-defence case Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Research of Self-Defence Case Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Research of Self-Defence Case Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Research of self-defence case

Operations research in military/defence

...of Analysis Within the Framework of Military Planning (Przemieniecki, p4) Decision Theory Operations research elevated the so-called decision theory in the military strategy and operations. As explained by the previous graph, OR is crucial in the analysis of problems as well as in the development of their solution. Decision theory is supposed to be the driving force behind OR’s wide acceptance in the military structure, particularly in cases of uncertainty. Essentially, the theory is about “a set of possible states that can be modified by the acts of the decision-maker. If all possible consequences of the acts are known and can be assigned utility factors, then an optimal choice of acts can be determined...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Self-Defence and the War on Terror

...bypass may be based on the fact that states need to report regularly to the Council and to finish the operation when decided on by the Council. Under self-defence, the control of the international community on the attack is very much limited and the right to end the operation is dependent on the defending state (Sahmoudi, 2010). In the case of the Afghanistan attacks, a possible reason for the US decision not to seek the authority of the Council for the use of force was the avoidance of the establishment of a precedent (Sahmoudi, 2010). This would likely give a wider discretion for the US on the use of force against international terrorism without the authority of the Security Council....
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

MOD (Ministry of Defence)

...? MOD (Ministry of Defence) Question a Biometrics is fundamentally regarded as an automated procedure of distinguishing a particular individual on the basis of behavioural feature. The technologies related to biometrics are incessantly becoming the base of a widespread assortment of extremely secure identification as well as personal authentication solutions. In this similar context, it has been apparently observed that the requirement for greater personal verification along with secure identification is constantly becoming apparent (TNS, 2012). In relation to the case study, a dedicated biometric “solution” is needed for the purpose of carrying out difficult roles within life threatening military...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

The defence of self-defence

...?Summary Ross should not be found guilty of the murder of Samantha. The defence of self-defence should have been put to the jury. Self-defence is a part of the doctrine of private defence in the English law. Self-defence is defined as use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an unjust threat. Self-defence is a complete defence unlike loss of control. An individual is allowed in the eyes of the statutory defence to make use of reasonable force in an attempt to avoid committing a crime in such situations in which the individual...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Civil Liability and Self-Defence

...of Alex in harming Bill was only to defend the property of Pumps and Pipes which is embraced within the generic application of self defence. However, the question now is whether or not the act of defending and the extent of it were reasonable and justified. In the case of Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] 2 W.L.R. 975, one issue which was resolved by the House of Lords was the question as to whether or not a defendant can claim self-defence when he had mistakenly albeit honestly perceived that it was necessary to defend himself against a clear danger even if the wrong belief was not reasonable.2 The decision in that suit enunciated that...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Defence Diplomacy

...the formation of an intricate web of alliances as would mitigate against aggression, on he one hand, and ensure alliance should aggression occur, on the other. The second inference is that the inability of some nations, such as those of the GCC, to defend themselves against overt, concentrated external military aggression, enters into such diplomatic defence alliance as would ensure that, in case of aggression, there would be an allied defence response. In other words, the formulation of diplomatic defence alliances, such as which are facilitated and carried forth by Diplomatic Defence Missions, constitute an integral component of national security and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Coastal Defence

...claimed land from reinundation by the sea, it is also a requirement of land claim to install some form of flood defence. (Doody 275-283) This defence is largely to keep the sea out, rather than an anti-erosion structure, and so tends to be more a flood defence measure than a measure for coastal protection. Typically this defence is an earth embankment, sometimes faced with stone, although occasionally defences may be concrete walls, particularly in cases of. high hinterland value, such as land claim for industrial development, nuclear power stations, or port activity. These flood defences are often constructed using...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Criminal defence of provocation

...affected the defendant’s self-control and provoked him/ her to kill (Stone 68). In the case of R v Cocker [1989] Crim LR 740, for example, a wife with terminal illness persistently begged her husband to end her pain by ending her life, which he eventually did by suffocating her. The judge directed the jury to eliminate provocations as a defence and the jury reluctantly gave a return of murder. The Court of Appeal agreed with the judge’s withdrawal of the provocation defence because there was no actual loss of control but only acquiescence by the husband of the wife’s request. The failure of the judge to refer the issue of provocation to the jury may be a ground for...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Gun control (Self defence low)

...Client Guns and Self Defense: Will a Gun Really Protect You? The right to bear arms ispart of the Constitution of the United States and therefore is considered a national right by those who support the use of guns domestically. One of the central claims for those who believe in the right to bear arms in the United States is that to deny this right would deny them the ability to protect themselves from would be attackers. The debate over the issue of gun control within the United States has been a lengthy controversy. However, this particular claim has not proven to be a successful use of a gun within a home. In addition, the incidents of guns being misused far out distances the number of times a gun is used for defense....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Self-Research Paper

...will then drive the individual into working harder and putting more effort in trying to be perfect in practicing the particular behavior. In the process, he will assign more time and able to sacrifice a lot for it (Covington 171). My self-worth as a core junior hockey players and the identity I have, has its roots in hockey and that the sport acts as the motivating force in my development. This therefore makes it very difficult for the hockey players as well as I to effect the transition in their career. This means that it becomes very difficult us to migrate from being key junior hockey players to attending college or university successfully. Therefore, self-worth that in most cases...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Research of self-defence case for FREE!

Contact Us