Nobody downloaded yet

Constitutional Issues - Term Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name: Instructor Course: Date: Constitutional issues Introduction Simeone was practicing the rights guaranteed to all citizens of American under the US Constitution: the right to peaceable assembly, the right to free speech, and the right to appeal our government for a remedy of grievances, assured by the First Amendment…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
Constitutional Issues
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Constitutional Issues"

Download file to see previous pages Her participation in this peaceful demonstration was more than moral—it was admirable and spirited and patriotic. There is an infringement of constitutional privileges of Lisa thus she stands a chance of getting legal remedy from courts. The court is one organ that must ensure the constitution is adhered to and respected by all. To extent, NRP events do not warranty constitutional uproar. This is because according to the NPR spokeswoman Anna Christopher; Simeone actions were against NPR's morals code. The code provides that "NPR journalists may not partake in marches and rallies" concerning issues NPR covers. The code notes that some requirements may not concern to outside providers. It uses an outworker who principally contributes arts reporting as an example. In the precedent year, NPR has come under inquiry for its dismissal of news forecaster Juan Williams after he supposed on Fox News that he was challenging on a plane with somebody wearing clothing that spots them as Muslim. At the moment, NPR said William’s remarks violated its code of ethics by engaging in media "that support punditry and rumor rather than fact-based investigation." The system has been sensitive to allegations that it carries an open-minded bias. An NPR chief administrative was forced to quit; after a conventional activist posted a film online of NPR's chief charity performance, complaining about the tea party's pressure on the Republican Party. The case is a code of ethics verses constitution freedom. What is in the text of the Constitution that gives the Supreme Court authority under the Constitution to review an act of Congress? Section 2 of the constitution grants the Supreme Court unique jurisdiction in cases involving ambassadors, congress and consuls. It is true that the constitution grants that we have the right of free speech, however, that right is not unrestricted. It has frequently been curtailed in situations which generate a danger to others and when the communication defames others; as declared in libel and slander laws. This law, however, does not advocate infringing free speech; it advocates that our voted officials utilize their free speech rights in a responsible manner. What constitutional doctrine gives the Court the power to interpret whether the act is a valid exercise of Congressional power? In some cases, the Supreme Court has merely appellate jurisdiction that may be checked by the Congress. The legislative body may not, however, alter the Court's original jurisdiction, as was established in Marbury v. Madison, 5 United States Cranch 1803; the same verdict which established the code of judicial review. Marbury apprehended that Congress can neither increase nor restrict the inventive jurisdiction of the Supreme courtyard (Epstein, Walker & Thomas, 2007, pp 451). However, the appellate authority of the Court is diverse. The Court's appellate authority is given "with such exemptions, and under such system as the Congress shall constitute. What is in the text of the Constitution that may be argued to give Congress the power to enact the health care law? A provision of the foundation recognized as the “commerce clause” offers Congress power to “control commerce among the numerous states.” There is a long stripe of Supreme Court decisions making that Congress has wide power to enact laws that considerably affect prices, market locations, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Constitutional Issues Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Constitutional Issues Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1435043-constitutional-issues
(Constitutional Issues Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Constitutional Issues Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1435043-constitutional-issues.
“Constitutional Issues Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1435043-constitutional-issues.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Constitutional Issues

CONSTITUTIONAL

...?Constitutional Answer to Question British parliament has a bicameral nature and it constitute of both House of Commons and House of Lords.The House of lords is in the verge of reformation and the right enjoyed by the hereditary peers to contribute vote in the House of Lords will be ended soon. It can be regarded as the primary action taken to reform the house and it can bring a democratic order to the house. According to the new act of reform the appointing of life peers to the house is restricted .The reform has the objective of opposing the majority winning nature of political parties in the house of lords. The argument currently focus on changing the appointment criteria, composition and functioning...
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper

The Constitutional Issues Raised by City of London versus Samede [2012] EWHC 34 (QB)

...? of Lecturer] Law The Constitutional Issues Raised By Of London versus Samede EWHC 34 (QB) Introduction The City of London versus Samede [2012] EWHC 34 (QB) was a case in the Royal Court of justice on January 18, 2012 before Mr. Justice Lindblom. The case was between the mayor, commonality and citizens of the City of London who were the claimants and Tammy Samede who was the representative of all who took part in the protest camp at St. Paul's Churchyard, London EC4. The other defendants present were George Barda, Daniel Ashman. The counsels for the claimant were David Forsdick and Zoe Leventhal (instructed by Andrew Colvin, the Comptroller and City Solicitor, City of London Corporation) while John...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Constitutional Law

...that the media has created in the sense Tony Blair himself can decide to go into war without anyone else's support is unreasonable. He must still discuss the matter with advisors, and also cabinet can still overrule the prime minister, for example Margaret Thatcher, who was removed as party leader. For all of the above to be true there must be some sort of constitution in the UK, although it is not codified the government must still operate under a framework, and does have restraints for example quangos such as WDA on certain issues, however due to the fact the government sets up these quangos usually have the same opinions as the party in power. The courts however do have a greater influence over the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Early Constitutional Issues

...Introduction America has come a long way since the days of Negro slavery. Gone are the days of prevalent human trafficking. To sell a fellow individual for slavery have long been prohibited by the laws. Now African-Americans share the same rights and privileges in law as the whites. They can own property, practice profession and vote, among others things. However, despite criminalization of any form of discrimination and despite the law being color blind, the fact remains that discrimination still exist in society. It may not be the same type of discrimination as what was done in the past, but it is still discrimination nonetheless. On multiculturalism Today, racial discrimination not only involves African-Americans... America has come a...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Effect of Terrorist Acts in the United States

...Counter-Terrorism: Constitutional and Legislative Issues As a result of the 9/11 terrorist attack on the United s; it became important for the constitution of the US to be amended to apply to people that have been charged with terrorist acts. According to the resolution that was passed by the United States congress, which was known as the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) on the 18th of September 2001, the President had the authority to attack any persons, organizations or nations that assisted the terrorists in executing their dastardly act as this would prevent any future occurrence of terrorism on the soils of the United States of America (United States Congress, 2001). It...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Counter-Terrorism: Constitutional and Legislative Issues

...to end illegal aliens, not fight terrorism. Likewise self reporting requirements are not used to fight terrorism. Notification by local authorities can be a tool to fight terrorism, as can criminal prosecutions. Border controls do not create a defense against terrorism, since the terrorist are not crossing the border illegally. The question becomes why create legislation to enforce strict rules on all immigrants, non-immigrants, and illegal aliens when the 9/11 terrorist were here legally. The answer is 9/11 was not the whole reason for immigration legislation. Bovard reports: Less than three months before the 9/11 attacks, the Supreme Court ruled that ‘immigrants within the United States are protected by the...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Counter-Terrorism: Constitutional and Legislative Issues

...Counter-Terrorism: Constitutional and Legislative Issues Introduction With the Guantanamo scandal America lost political and moral standing and the opportunity to work with some allied governments. The lawyers to the president had nullified the law which makes torture a crime. Severe methods like the water boarding, in which the individual is subjected to simulated drowning, were discontinued after 2003. The Congress brought out the Detainee Treatment Act and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 to make sure of proper rights for war prisoners. The military was brought out of its coercive interrogations methods by the end of 2006(Taylor 2010). Effects of the different laws Though the previous Bush...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Counter-Terrorism: Constitutional and Legislative Issues

...Counter-Terrorism: Constitutional and Legislative Issues Facts Rumsfeld v. Padilla: On May 8, 2002, federal agents arrested Jose Padilla, a US citizen, at Chicago’s O’Hare International airport as he arrived from Pakistan. Subsequently, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, acting on orders from the President designated Padilla an “enemy combatant” and ordered Padilla be detained in military custody where he remained for the next two years while his attorney sought to challenge his detention via a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum (Writ). “A writ [is] directed to the person detaining another, and commanding him to produce the body of the prisoner or the person detained” (Black, 1992). The petition included...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Constitutional Rights

...it several times. Slowly read it out loud, listening carefully to the words. What is the difference between ordinary rights and so-called “Constitutional Rights”? There is no difference, except that those rights enumerated and guaranteed in the US Constitution get more attention. Breathing is not a Constitutionally protected activity, yet the Declaration of Independence clearly claimed a “right to life” exists. The Supreme Court has repeatedly claimed to have found a right to privacy, yet we find no such concept enumerated in the articles or amendments of the Constitution. In the US the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of what your rights are. Pay careful attention to what they...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Constitutional convention

... of States which persuaded the Continental Congress, in the fall of February 1787, to convene for a conference of delegates to rally in May in Philadelphia (McClellan 1-2). For three and a half consecutive months throughout a sweltering, clammy Philadelphia summer, the delegates argued about outstandingly perceptive issues, including whether the national government should be permitted to sanction state laws and whether the states should be abolished. To hearten the delegates to articulate unequivocally, the Constitutional Convention seized astonishing foot paths to guarantee confidentiality. Guards were stationed at the doors of Independence Hall, and no replicas of the periodical were tolerable. Delegates were advised to raze... ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Constitutional Issues for FREE!

Contact Us