Nobody downloaded yet

The Decision in Baird Textiles v Marks & Spencer - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This study discusses the case Baird Textiles v Marks & Spencer involves the question of contractual terms to be implied by the parties’ conduct during the operation of a running contract. This paper examines whether the requirement of certainty has to be much too rigid…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.1% of users find it useful
The Decision in Baird Textiles v Marks & Spencer
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Decision in Baird Textiles v Marks & Spencer"

Download file to see previous pages The magnitude of the contract was such that notice of termination would be at least three years. The appeal court that decided for the defendant held that there could be no assumption of a contract for an indefinite period. The lower court had observed that in order for the contract to be enforceable, parties intention must be so certain without the court having to write a contract for them. And that in the instant case there had been no certainty as to the continuance of the contract for an indefinite period or a requirement of sufficient notice for termination of the contract. It also stated that no implied contract to that effect could be inferred.2 Although the facts and circumstances of the case would appear to make it a deserving case for the plaintiff, they are denied of the relief for want of certainty which could be ascertained only by way of reducing the required terms to a written contract to that effect.  Meaning of certainty The fact that the defendant had deliberately avoided making any such written commitment to the plaintiff as averred by the plaintiff themselves shows that they had been aware of uncertainty involved and that they had a forewarning that they should reduce such terms of notice period termination to writing. Their inaction proves to be fatal to the contract’s continuity. Thus, even after compliance with the rules of offer and acceptance and other elements essential for the formation of the contract, a contract cannot be enforced by a court if it is marred by ‘vagueness and incompleteness’. In long-term contracts, parties may not be able to set a fixed price because of fluctuation in market conditions. A contract without a fixed price is not necessarily vague or incomplete. Therefore, The Sale of Goods Act 1979 makes a provision in section 8 for the price to be agreed after the contract formation.3 As early as in 1932, the issue of vagueness and incompleteness was dealt with in Hillas & Co V Arcos Ltd. 4 The court in this case heavily relied on the formality so as to put the agreement strictly business-like unlike in social relationships. In this case, the seller Arcos contracted with the buyer Hillas for the supply of Russian timber for one the year 1930. The seller also agreed with the buyer for his option to purchase timber of ‘fair specification’ for the next year 1931 also. But the seller could not supply timber to the buyer for the next year as he had fully sold out his timber to another party. When sued by Hillas for breach of contract, it was argued that agreement for supply in 1931 was uncertain and hence void for uncertainty. House of Lords disagreed for the reason that the words ‘fair specification’ were sufficient to lend precision i.e certainty to make a binding contract. Lord Wright explains how certainty in law and flexibility in business could be aligned. He states that most of the business agreements are recorded in crude and summary fashion. The words that appear to the business community as sufficient and precise may appear to others as incomplete and imprecise. As such, the court is entrusted with the responsibility of interpreting documents fairly and broadly without being fault-finding. At the same time, it is not for the court to write a contract for the parties by going far beyond the words spelled out.   ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Law of Contract Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1431032-law-of-contract-assessment
(Law of Contract Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1431032-law-of-contract-assessment.
“Law of Contract Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1431032-law-of-contract-assessment.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Decision in Baird Textiles v Marks & Spencer

Marks and Spencer

...power to dominate over the joint decisions of the company. Hence, Marks and Spencer appointed Marc Bolland on May 1, 2010 as its CEO. In the meantime, the Board had stressed highly upon the accountability of decisions being undertaken to minimise any imbalance arising on account of the double role played by the CEO and Chairman, Sir Stuart Rose. Furthermore, the Board of Directors consist of 6 non-executive directors, out of its total strength of 12, appointed for a term of four years. The company had managed to align to its Plan A, aiming towards greater environmental sustainability and ethical concerns. By the end of 2010, the company claimed to have accomplished 80...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Marks and spencer assignment

...?Marks & Spencer: Introduction Marks & Spencer came into existence on 28th September 1884 (Corporate, web). Aggregately, operating with more than 600UK stores, and serving more than 21 million customers each week, M&S has employed more than 75,000 people in more than 41 countries. Also, the sale of food accounts for 51% and 49% of remaining revenue comes from the sale of clothing and home products. Investment in subsidiary and associated companies are accounted for in the non-current assets portion of statement of financial position. In the consolidated statement of financial position of M&S, the company have many subsidiaries or associate companies. However, when the consolidated cash flows are analysed, they reflect ‘acquisition... of...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework

Marks and Spencer

...?(your Case Study: Marks and Spencer, Ltd. (A) Case summary Marks and Spencer, Ltd., (M&S) has recorded consistent pattern of growth in its operations over the long period of its history and more specifically, during 1981-1988. However, the firm faced significant challenges throughout the 80s due to many factors like poor show of its own brand in the Canadian operations as opposed to its other local brands viz., Peoples/D’Alliard’s, failure to reach profitable customers in France, and the need to refurbish stores across UK for greater customer satisfaction. Its strategies in UK revolved around a) supply management b) brand power c) customer orientation and d) empowerment...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Marks & Spencer

...?What are the major challenges facing this organisation? Marks and Spencer’s (M&S) has always enjoyed a strong M&S brand, strong retail and trading, and strong quality. The main issues that have affected the brand are product, price and stores (Ruddick, 2012). It has been facing survival crisis amidst intense competition (Mellahi, Jackson and Sparks, 2002). In addition they have not been spending on marketing. Its competitors include the traditional rivals such as John Lewis and Next, and in addition very recently Primark, with its low-cost clothing has changed the face of British High Streets (Ruddick, 2012a). Long after its competitors had started sourcing cheaper goods, M&S adhered to its ‘buy British’ policy (Mellahi, Jackson... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Marks & Spencer

...Marks & Spencer PLC Marks and Spencer PLC (M & S) is known as an international retailer with 718 locations. The Group has a worldwide reputation, selling items in 34 countries. "The company was always considered to have a great management support that helped in its growth. But the last years, M&S's managers seem to fail on their strategic decisions, leading the group to lower and lower sales and profits" (Marks and Spencer PLC, n.d.). Sales decline was 4.8 % in 2000. The tools and frameworks applied to marketing in the UK do not differ to those used to market products in other countries. Identifying these issues and...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Marks & Spencer plc

..., Strategy, Structure and Systems. They care less for the soft S’s, Skills, Staff, Style and Shared Values. Analysis of 7-S of Marks & Spencer Competitive Strategy Recently , it was reported by Marks & Spencer that there has been a drop in clothing sales of 8.5% and food sales 1.7%. In phase two of the competitive strategies, M&S continue expanding their food business while exploiting new opportunities in financial services. The Positioning Game(2005) suggested some months ago that the group needs to make a marketing decision about its food versus clothing businesses. There has been little indication of action in this direction and I predict further...
14 Pages(3500 words)Research Paper

Retail Marketing (Marks & Spencer)

...no finger on the customer's pulse. It lost valuable information that should have driven its strategy. Managers had no decision making power and were unable to implement even small changes without top management approval. The top management had no perception of the external environments in which the stores operated and was complacent to the growing changes and customer expectations. The employees were not expected to shoulder responsibility, did not feel involved and lower morale led to lower productivity. Greenbury also made a poor investment decision in purchasing the Littlewood chain and added to the financial problems. Marks and Spencer failed to respond quickly to...
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study

Marks & Spencer

...Marks & Spencer Group Plc is one of the UK's leading retailers of clothing, foods, homeware and financial services. It holds lading position in the UK for stylish clothing sales. For instance, Marks & Spencer sales during last quarter of 2005/2006 financial year exceed all experts forecasted. Sales volume of shops, working not less than a year, increased for 6,8% for the quarter, ended on the April, 1 while analytics forecast was about 3,2%. Surely, this company website strongly helps to increase sales and to keep the customers loyal. Everybody knows that retail is one of the most competitive economics sector. Shops, marketplaces, boutiques, super- and hypermarkets offer...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Marks & Spencer

...conflicts. Incentive schemes, when they are carefully considered can create value for the company by motivating the key people and decision-makers for pursuing value-adding activities. References ________. (2005). “Will the real Marks & Spencers stand up?: Search for that Winning Brand.” Strategic Direction. Volume 21, No. 9, pp. 28-31. Emerald Insight Accessed on April 27, 2010. Arnold, G. (2008). Corporate Financial Management. UK: Pearson Education Limited Baker, George P., Michael C. Jensen and Kevin J. Murphy. (1988). "Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs. Theory." Journal of Finance, V. 43, No. 3: pp. 593-616. Accessed on April 28, 2010 from the Social...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

CONTRACT LAW

...to the other parties to create a clear representation. In other words, the concession made must be clearly communicated and understood by both parties otherwise said concession may not be considered as validly made. As decided by the court in the case of Baird Textiles holdings ltd V Marks & spencer plc3, where the concession made is ambivalent and insufficient to establish a clear representation, the party or parties to whom the concession was made may not use the doctrine of promissory estoppel as a defense. Is there a need to make an express concession to in order for the parties to make use of the doctrine of promissory estoppel? Apparently, the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic The Decision in Baird Textiles v Marks & Spencer for FREE!

Contact Us