Difference between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Running header: THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED The rights of the accused: Understanding the right to trial, warrant requirements and the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause Fill in Your name here Class title here here August 19, 2011 The rights of the accused: Understanding the right to trial, warrant requirements and the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause Abstract: According to Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution the judicial power of the federal courts is quite limited…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.4% of users find it useful
Difference between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Difference between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause"

Running header: THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED The rights of the accused: Understanding the right to trial, warrant requirements and the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause Fill in Your name here Class title here Instructors name here August 19, 2011 The rights of the accused: Understanding the right to trial, warrant requirements and the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause Abstract: According to Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution the judicial power of the federal courts is quite limited. The largest amount of judicial power resting in the hands of the individual states as per the Constitution itself, in quoting the Constitution itself, “to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State;—between Citizens of different States;—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.” (Article III, 1791) However, according to Article I, Section 8 we notice that Congress is given very broad powers with regards to lawmaking specifically when providing for the “common defense and general welfare of the United States” (Article I, 1791) The purpose of the Bill of Rights was to provide a clear delineation between those legislative and legal powers and the rights of the citizens of the United States of America. The following paper will explore the rights of the accused to fair trial, the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause as well as naming and exploring four exceptions to the warrant requirement as accepted by the modern legal and criminal justice world. The rights of the accused: Understanding the right to trial, warrant requirements and the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause Understanding the Sixth Amendment: The Sixth Amendment is specifically designed to afford a fair and equitable trial to those who are being accused of a crime. By stating that the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial, the original authors were attempting to avoid the long preparation period that exists in many cases where an individual may spend longer than six months awaiting trial for accusations that have not been proven yet. Additionally this amendment provides for an impartial jury of the location where the individual resides, with regards to criminal offenses. The Supreme Court decision in Duncan v. Louisiana ensured that every individual regardless of state of residence or type of crime, federal or local should be afforded the right to a jury trial. Prior to this point certain offenses of a criminal nature in Louisiana had no right to a jury trial, and the Supreme Court decision clarified that the 14th Amendment combined with the Sixth Amendment assured this right to all regardless of prior state law or decision. This is another area that has seen large changes since the original writing. There have been notable exceptions regarding the jury trial for infamous individuals being moved to different states for political reasons. Additionally it should be noted that in modern jury trials individuals will not face persons who are “peers” so much as individuals who generally have nothing in common with the individual themselves. Lastly the Sixth Amendment address’s witness’s and defense counsel; again this has changed drastically since the original authoring of this amendment. Whereas the original authors attempted to make it as clear as possible the resulting challenges and Supreme Court edicts changed the intent of the law. In Johnson v. Zerbst the Court announced an absolute rule requiring appointment of counsel for federal criminal defendants. It has been debated that the original intent was to ensure that every defendant had the availability of, but not necessarily provide at state expense legal counsel. Additionally the decision in Gideon v. Wainwright decided that everyone should in fact have legal counsel and that if they are too poor to afford it themselves than it should be provided for them. The nature of the legal system in the United States is that it is founded on precedence and not innovated with each decision. While there are benefits to the utilization of precedence this does not mean that precedence is a beneficial approach in every case. Exceptions to the Fourth Amendment and the Warrant Requirement: There are exceptions to every rule as many of us are taught as children, in this case there are definite exceptions to the warrant requirement as outlined by the Fourth Amendment. The first exception to the warrant requirement is individual consent. "Consent to search any property must be given by the actual owner or, as set forth in United States v. Matlock (1974), by a person in charge of that property" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 219). The next exception to the warrant requirement is the plain sight or plain view requirement which generally applies to vehicles and non-residential applications, "a diminished expectation of privacy surrounds" an automobile, "a vehicle is used for transportation" and not as a residence, occupants and contents are "in plain view", and vehicles are "necessarily highly regulated by the government" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p.232).  Another exception to the rule is the exigent circumstances exception; this particular exception is one of the more tenuous as it places the entire burden of proof upon the officer who uses this exception. Unfortunately, because officer testimony is often upheld as fact regardless of counter testimony evidence or available witness testimony this also allows for a larger possibility of officer misconduct. Therefore the Supreme Courts in various rulings have placed the following limitations on the use of this approach, “include danger of physical harm to an officer or others, danger of destruction of evidence, driving while intoxicated, hot-pursuit situations and individuals requiring rescuing" (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 234). While this is a limiting factor, unfortunately given the allowances made for officers and disallowed in many cases to the average citizen this can still lead to police investigator misconduct. The last exception to be addressed is the incident to arrest exception; this exception has been upheld in rulings as being necessary as long as certain boundaries are not crossed. Specifically when a person is arrested in their home, "a limited search made in conjunction with an in-home arrest" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 228) this does not mean that entire house can be searched or that contraband that is not connected to the actual arrest can be used as evidence. In fact this exception is very specific in that it refers to officer safety, and evidence directly attached to the reason for the arrest. The difference between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause: Reasonable suspicion is the suspicion generated by any reasonable and prudent person. In most legal cases the reasonable and prudent person is representative of the general public while the individual not being reasonable and prudent is the individual who acts outside of the normal boundaries as vaguely applied to the general public. Reasonable suspicion is therefore the suspicion of a criminal act being committed or having been committed that any reasonable and prudent individual would have noticed as well. Probable cause is the suspicion generated as a result of the surrounding environment or actions and not necessarily that generated by a reasonable suspicion. For instance an example of probable cause could be watching as an individual dressed in darker non-descript clothing walks past a house, and then doubles back and quickly and furtively runs into the back yard. This would be probable cause for an officer who saw this occurs to stop and investigate with the goal of preventing a crime from occurring. The differences between reasonable suspicion and probable cause are separate but not entirely different in that there must be reasonable suspicion for there to be probable cause. Probable cause is that evidence or action that allows an officer to make an arrest whereas reasonable suspicion is that evidence or action that allows an officer to watch, detain for questioning or follow a suspected criminal. In the case Terry vs. Ohio the Supreme Court decided that the following applies to the officer on trial, “reasonable grounds to believe that petitioner was armed and dangerous, and it was necessary for the protection of him and others to take swift measures to discover the true facts and neutralize the threat of harm if it materialized” (Terry vs. Ohio, 1968). This has also been applied in cases following and is now referred to as the Terry Stop and is a procedure taught in every law enforcement academy nationwide. Conclusion: As we can see the importance for the Fourth Amendment exists primarily as a defense against the potential for the government’s abuse of our rights. In many cases recently we have heard that the Fourth Amendment is being taken away, with such congressional acts as the Patriot Act and other acts of congress for many persons the Fourth Amendment has been severely limited. However, there remains Article I Section 8, which clearly allows extraordinary powers to Congress should they deem it necessary for the defense of this nation. Additionally there are many reports surfacing even today of federal intervention at a state level with regards to law enforcement stemming directly from the added complaints of police brutality occurring. Does this reflect a growing abuse of power by law enforcement across the nation or is it simply changes in the mindset of individuals and if it is changes in the average person’s mindset than does this by default change the approach taken using a reasonable suspicion given that the reasonable and prudent individual may see things differently now? Regardless understanding the Fourth Amendment and the surrounding benefits and controversy that come with it could fill books of information. Reference page: Article I, (1791). United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8. Washington D.C.: United States of America. Article III, (1791). United States Constitution, Article III, Section 2. Washington D.C.: United States of America. Harr, J. S., & Hess, K. M., (2005). Constitutional law and the criminal justice system (Third ed., pp. 219, 228, 232, 234). United States: Thomson Wadsworth. Terry vs. Ohio, (1968). Article III, Section 2. Terry v. Ohio, 392 u.s. 1 (1968) 392 u.s. 1 terry v. Ohio. Certiorari to the supreme court of Ohio. no. 67. Argued December 12, 1967. Decided June 10, 1968 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Difference between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Difference Between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause Essay)
“Difference Between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Difference between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause

The Founding Fathers Suspicion

...?The United s has a government for the people and by the people. Our founding fathers saw the government as a representative type of government rather than a government ruled by the people through a direct democracy. James Madison wrote in the Federalist No. 63 that democracy’s defining principle “lies in the total exclusion of the people in their collective capacity.” (as cited from Ferrand, 1911, p. 422 ). Democracy to a representative type of government lies with rules and limitations provided in a written constitution and not based on a “mob” rule or the rule of the majority by themselves. During the 1700’s and 1800’s, people’s revolution was inherent and countries like the United States and France achieved their country’s... United s has ...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Difference between two time periods

...of the fourteenth century when scholars start to become skeptical about strict religious standards and begin to take particular concern on the nature of human existence (Johnson, 2005, p. 4). During this period, artists create artistic innovation, such as the portrayal of different aspects of life without necessarily preaching about good and evil. For instance, Michelangelo’s David demonstrates a realistic presentation of beauty although his subject is a biblical figure. As if deviating from the religious standards of the medieval traditions, David embodies the physical and psychological transitions of the Renaissance artist. The Relationship between Medieval and Renaissance Art In the context of...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summar

...Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary Institution: Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary According to Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, criminal law provides for probable cause. This refers to the standards through which law enforcement agencies are allowed to grounds to make arrests. This simply means that probable cause refers to a reasonable conviction that a person or suspect has committed a criminal offense (Shwegel, 2006). Probable cause is often necessary to merit the provision of a warrant for...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Difference between Capital and Revenue

...Capital and Revenue In financial accounting there are a number of distinguishing terms that aid an organization and its accountants keep better and efficient records. Two of these notable accounting terms are capital and revenue. While the terms share similar traits they differ in crucial ways. Both terms refer to funds the organization has on hand. Revenue is the funds that are implemented on a daily or frequent basis. One considers that revenue can constitute a number of wide ranging purposes, all of which are contingent on the specific organization (‘What is a capital expenditure versus a revenue expenditure’ 2010). For instance, revenue can be funds that go towards staffing, utilities, daily supply, or purchases of services... and Revenue ...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Reasonable Suspicion v. probable cause

...Difference between "reasonable suspicion" and "probable cause" “Reasonable suspicion is the legal standard by which a police officer has the right tobriefly detain a suspect for investigatory purposes and frisk the outside of their clothing for weapons” (Silverman, 2009). It is difficult for the crime investigating officers to gather all evidences before arresting a criminal. Circumstantial evidences may sometimes lead the police officers to detain suspected people for interrogation. At the same time the investigating officer should have reasonable evidences to arrest or detain a...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The Line between Reasonable and Unreasonable Force

...The Line between Reasonable and Unreasonable Force Nowadays, people have come up with several definitions of self-defense, which vary depending on ethnicity, background and also personal judgments. If one injures or kills another person, he/ she will have to defend themselves on the basis that they were in imminent danger of death of grievous bodily harm, otherwise, they will be prosecuted for murder or manslaughter. However, this definition is rarely applicable in a real life situation, and while it might make sense to reason like that in a courtroom, when one is walking in a street with a reputation for violent crime, his/ her survival instincts tend to take precedence over your moral...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Difference between cultures

...between the two cultures i.e. Emirati and a South Korean one. Abu Dhabi is the main capital city of United Arab Emirates. It is probably the symbol of the cultural and their values of the Emirati group of people. UAE is among the top countries regarding the population growth. Demographically, South Korea is not a very populous country. However, the average age of people in South Korea is higher than the average age of Emiratis. In South Korea, there are different languages used by different group of people but the main or we can say the official language of South Korea is Korean language, which is used by 70 % of the residents. After Korean language, there comes the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper

Difference between 2 companies

..., the company primarily relies on the use of franchising operations in conducting its operations in its other locations. The term franchising has been used to describe many different forms of business operations, however a franchise is basically an agreement between two parties that comprise of the franchisee and the entrepreneur (franchisor). A franchise agreement grants the franchise the authorization and right to operate a specific McDonald’s restaurant at given location. McDonald’s franchise agreements usually have a time span of 20 years (Gilbert, 2009). The franchise is given a number of rights that include the right to use the McDonald’s trademark and method of operation. On the other hand,...
12 Pages(3000 words)Assignment

Arrest warrants/probable cause/legal searches to the police station uninitiated rules out the suspicion of the police on if he committed the crime or not. It is not in the police’s mandate to ask for warrants on hunches based on feelings. They must be able to come up with concrete reasons that make sense to the eyes of the judge, or their request will be denied. On whether they have probable cause to search Mr. A’s home the answer is definitely yes. The likelihood of gaining a search warrant is if the police have much information to persuade the judge to offer them a search warrant. When Mr. A decided to bring the watches and refuse to answer, any more questions can be information enough to show that he...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Difference between nature and goodness

...2. What is the relationship between nature and goodness in two of following: Montaigne, The Winter’s Tale, and The Tempest? There is quite some difference between nature and goodness. This is evident from the Ariel and Caliban, who are the main characters in the Tempest and The winter’s Tale respectively. This essay will show difference between nature and goodness by comparing Ariel Caliban’s character. Distinctions will be made together with a counterargument. In his exposition "Cannibals," Montaignes constantly states that what’s natural is identical with what’s great, as well as Nature itself should become the luminosity through which human activity...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Difference between Reasonable Suspicion and Probable Cause for FREE!

Contact Us