Nobody downloaded yet

Torts law problem - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name 25 July 2011 First Problem Briefly stating the facts, Rhett, a land developer was interested in purchasing a land in the Outback, in New South Wales. Before purchasing the land from Melanie, he wanted to conduct a background check on the piece of land he was buying…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94% of users find it useful
Torts law problem
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Torts law problem"

Download file to see previous pages Based on this certificate, Rhett purchased the land. Later on when Rhett submitted his plans for construction of a residential subdivision, the Council rejected the proposal, on account of flood risk. Due to the refusal, and no other recourse left with Rhett, he had to sell his land to a local farmer at a substantial loss. Now from the facts above, it is quite clear that, there was injustice meted out to Rhett. Now, the problem that Rhett is facing has a solution in Law of Torts. Law of Torts is the field of law which deals civil harms that may be caused to a person. The concept of negligence is integral to the Law of Torts. The definition of negligence under tort law states that, “the breach of a legal duty to take care, resulting in damage to the claimant which was not desired by the defendant” [L.B. Curzon, Dictionary of Law]. Another popular definition states that, “Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.” [Per Alderson B., Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co. (1856)]. From Lord Curzon’s definition, we understand that there are three important aspects to prove negligence, one being ‘legal duty to take care’, ‘breach of duty of care’ and the third one being ‘damages’. We will first understand the three ingredients of negligence, and then go on to observe whether the problem at hand actually amounts to negligence, and if so, what the recourse that Rhett has is in this given scenario. Now the duty of care essentially means that, every person owes a duty not to harm their neighbour, and reasonably foresee, whether there action may cause to the person. This principle was laid down in the landmark judgement of Donahue v Stevenson. Further in Capro v. Dickman, their primary components of Duty of Care were laid down. The judgement said that Harm must be (1) reasonably foreseeable (2) there must be a relationship of proximity between the plaintiff and defendant and (3) it must be 'fair, just and reasonable' to impose liability. Now as goes for the ‘first component’, we have to determine whether the Council clerk could reasonably foresee the harm he was about to cause Rhett. In this scenario, it can be reasonably assumed that the clerk knew that the whole and sole responsibility of running the background check on the said property was on him. He was also aware that, if there was any irregularity in the records, it was his duty to point out the Scarlette. Failure to do so, would result in great harm to the buyer of the land, as the buyer was solely depending upon the background check of the Council. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that, the clerk was in a position to ascertain the kind of harm he would cause if he did not take the proper steps to give the proper background check on the aforesaid land. So we are sure, that the first ground of Duty of Care exists. Moving on to the ‘second component’, i.e. the relationship of proximity between the plaintiff and the defendant. There was a definite relationship between Rhett and the Council clerk. Rhett had approached the Council clerk, to provide him with the background check on the said land. Therefore, Rhett was expecting the clerk to carry out his duties rightfully and perform the check for him. It was the clerk’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Torts law problem Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1429146-torts-law-problem
(Torts Law Problem Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1429146-torts-law-problem.
“Torts Law Problem Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1429146-torts-law-problem.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Torts law problem

Law of Torts

...? Law of Torts By 26, Mar Introduction Duty of care is a key element, and indeed the foundation of the tort of negligence. The modern concept of the duty of care has its roots in the case of Donoghue V Stevenson.1 In this case, Lord Atkins established that to prove the tort of negligence, the claimant has to cross 3 hurdles, that is, establish that the defendant owed him a duty of care both in law and fact, that the claimant breached the duty of care, and that as result of the breach, the claimant suffered a damage that was caused by the defendants breach (causation). Consequently, for one to establish the tort of negligence, one must establish that the other party was not only careless, but also that there existed a relationship... . But to...
12 Pages(3000 words)Coursework

English Torts Law

...?Topic:  Torts Essay Question: Does the idea of proportional liability- that the defendant pays for the chance that her negligence caused the claimant’s injury-serve justice? What is the proper scope of such idea in English Law? Where the defendant’s negligence caused the claimant’s injury - justice is equitably served when the defendant is held liable for the claimant’s injury. The defendant is required under English Torts Law on negligence to compensate the claimant by payment of damages or fine or by heeding an injunction as duly determined by the court. This should effectively deter people from being careless in the conduct of their duties. In a way this intends to enforce a standard of behaviour, to protect the life, welfare... , if,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Torts Law Problem

... Task Torts Law Problem In the scenario, Cathy may seek a legal redress against MoreeRE under the tort of negligence for misrepresentation or negligent advice. The cause arises as against MoreeRE under the doctrine of vicarious liability that provides that, an agent’s action is binding upon the principle if the employee was discharging his/her duties in the course of employment. In Lloyd vs. Grace Smith & Co, 1 the court held that a principle is variously liable for the fraud of an agent acting for a corporation. By employing this rule, John was an employee of MoreeRE and was making representations for the company in his dealings with Cathy. His actions could therefore be interpreted as being binding upon MoreeRE Company, and thus... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Law of Torts: Negligence

...?Law of Torts: Negligence Negligence pertains to doing or failing to do something that a reasonable person would or would not do under certain situations, which causes injury, damage, or losses to another person as a result (Keenan and Smith 2006). Any person suing for negligence is potentially seeking financial compensation for damages. The compensation is meant to put them in the position they were before the case of negligence occurred. Kelly, Hayward, Hammer and Hendy (2011) note that before a plaintiff can sue a person for damages related to negligence, there are elements that have to be proved before a court of law by the plaintiff. In this case, whether or not negligence has occurred will be a matter of satisfying... against, Jed and...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Law of Torts

...1 Law of Torts I would advise Mr. Andy that his accident occurred in the type of area commonly known for producing similar types of vehicle mishaps, and it will not be necessary for him to prove any type of vicarious liability. It is the duty of the owner to make the property safe. . in the case of McWilliams V. Sir William Arroll 1962, the 'but for' test is applicable on the premise that he (Mr. Andy) would not have sustained the injury but for the breach of the (property owner) defendant. Moreover as in Anns V Merton (1977), Lord Wilberforce proposed a two-staged testonce neighborhood was established, there is a prima facie duty of care, which can only be rebutted on policy ground....
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Torts problem question-Negligent misstatements

...Torts problem question-Negligent mis ments A Helen incurs extra cost in acquiring a different house because of the bank appointed surveyor's undervaluation of the originally proposed house by more than 60,000. The owner of the original house Andrew also is forced to lower his price by 20,000 because of the undervaluation. In this case Rashid had no contract with either Helen or Andrew. Bank which appointed surveyor in order to lend money to Helen based on his valuation alone had contract with Helen. And it has charged Helen 150 for valuation purposes. Though Andrew has suffered economic loss, there was no contract with between him and the surveyor nor the bank. Whoever makes a claim due to somebody's...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Torts problem question

...whilst driving by using a mobile phone. (See also Robertson v Klos, [2005] HCJAC 136). In the case of Anna, she was driving with only one hand and using her mobile phone with the other. Hence, Anna was negligent in her driving and in breach of her duty of care as a driver. Causation. To be able to claim against Anna for personal injury and/or damage to property under the law of tort, it is imperative that causation must be established. There is causation when both factual causation and legal causation are present. Factual causation refers to the nexus between the defendant's action and the claimant's damage (the 'but for' test) while legal causation refers to the break or 'novus actus' in the chain of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Private Law and Public Law

...is incorporated. The public law issue, on the other hand, refers to the criminal liability (for theft, robbery, physical injuries, kidnapping or death, among others) that happened on occasion of the theft or robbery aboard the cruise ship The Minnow. Specifically, the public law issue is whether the criminal law of Liberia (the country of the ship's flag), or the criminal law of Nassau, Key West, and Grand Cayman (the possible place where the crime was committed or any of the elements of the crime occurred) or the criminal law of the United States. For the purpose of the given problem however, the detailed discussion will be limited to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Torts Law

...Torts law Introduction Liability for negligence is founded on the principles of duty of care, breach of that duty and the resultant damage and loss. The defendant must have been implicated in all these circumstances to become liable. In the instant case, the service provider Family Friendly Fishing had a duty of care to their patrons Mickey and family in that the fishing vessel and accessories should have been kept free from defects especially as the ones involved in dangerous sports. Though the captain of the vessel Neil already warned the service provider of the defective condition of the fishing equipment, the service provider brushed it aside in a casual manner saying no untoward incident had...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Nuisance ( torts law)

...Law of Torts Private Nuisance Introduction “A private nuisance is simply a violation of ones use of quiet enjoyment of land. It doesnt include trespass” (Restatement, 1979). It is an intrusion with an individual’s delight and usage of his land. The law distinguishes that landholders, or those in lawful ownership of land, have the power to the undamaged state of the property and to sensible solace and ease in its occupancy. Private nuisances entail harm to the lands of the complainant of his use of the ownership of such lands. Blackstone describes a private nuisance as "anything done to the hurt or annoyance of the lands, tenements, or hereditaments of another." The forms of private nuisances are almost countless, thus resulting... by invalid...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Torts law problem for FREE!

Contact Us