The Right to Counsel - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The Right to Counsel The right to counsel is considered to integral to an individual’s right to undergo a fair trial. Through this right, one can seek the aid of legal counsels or lawyers, who would then represent him in court. It is the defendant that practices this right…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.3% of users find it useful
The Right to Counsel
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Right to Counsel"

The Right to Counsel The right to counsel is considered to integral to an individual’s right to undergo a fair trial. Through this right, one can seek the aid of legal counsels or lawyers, who would then represent him in court. It is the defendant that practices this right. As mandated by the Constitution, it is the policy of the United States government to guarantee the protection of individual rights, including those of persons who have been accused and arrested for crimes that they may or they may have not committed. In realizing this, the U.S. government is obligated to provide a legal counsel for the accused if he or she is not in position to acquire the services of a private lawyer. The expenses incurred for the entire proceeding until the case is resolves is shouldered by the government. It was the federal government that took the first concrete steps to enshrine the right to counsel. The most fundamental basis for this is the U.S. Bill of Rights. It took a while before the courts in the different states in the country began concurring and affirming to the said right as interpreted and defined by the U.S. Supreme Court. There were a few states that already granted affirmation to it even during the 1800s. However, most of the states followed suit when the U.S. Supreme Court came out with its decision of Gideon v. Wainwright in 1963. This decision cemented the provision that points out to the strict requirement of defendants being granted the right to counsel. Subsequent rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court also reinforced the right by clarifying the parameters in which law enforcement agents should function in order not to commit violations. In 1966, a landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, created a tremendous impact on the effort of defining the right to counsel. This was the ruling on the Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, which is now known as the Miranda Doctrine. Through its decision on the Miranda case, “the Supreme Court decided that the state or federal government had to provide an attorney if suspects wanted one but could not afford it” and that “suspects could waive their rights to speak to police without an attorney, realizing what they said could be used against them later in court” (Burgan, 2007, p.57). There were other rulings that followed that further bolstered the right to counsel. One clear example is Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, which was decided in 1977. Referring to the rights stipulated in the 6th and the 14th Amendments, it clarifies that a counsel for the defendant or accused should be around once information is obtained from him either by actual members of law enforcement bodies or by any individual who does so in behalf of the police and any other law enforcement agency. As a concept, the right to counsel was not only developed in the 20th century. History shows that this was first proposed in response to the practice of the English not to provide legal counsels for those accused of serious criminal charges, especially in cases when the death penalty may be employed on the convicts. One of the most prominent of such cases was the prosecution and subsequent conviction of Mary Stuart in the latter part of the 1500s. The founding fathers of the United States, particularly those who contributed to the formulation of the U.S. Constitution saw the great need for protecting the rights of the accused. The Framers saw that a defendant without any counsel could be subjected to an unfair trial. It is through the assistance of an attorney that the prosecution would bear the burden of proving the guilt of the accused. Apparently, what the Framers were trying to avoid is the tendency to have a justice system that is inquisitorial. In view of this, one of the earliest amendments in U.S. Constitution, which was done in 1791, stated that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy… the right to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense” (Tomkovicz, 2001, p.11). That early in the history of the judicial system of the country, it was already clear that the Framers were already much concerned with the protection of the rights of the defendants. The evolution or development of the right to counsel clause in the U.S. judicial system has paved the way for a clearer appreciation of its parameter. Such definitions and limitations are the bases for the elements that compose the right to counsel clause. One particular element is that an indigent defendant must be provided with legal counsel who is paid for by the government. It is a fact that the accused may not always have the resources to pay for a private lawyer. This condition should not hinder him from defending himself in court. The most prominent example of this is Gideon v. Wainwright. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court points out “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him” (Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ). Another important element in the right to counsel is attributed to the attitude of members of law enforcement agencies towards arrested suspects. There can be no better example of this as the case Miranda v. Arizona. This stemmed from the fact that the police were able to extract incriminating information from the suspect without the presence of the latter’s legal counsel. The Miranda decision, however, reiterated the point that the any information acquired from the suspect without the presence of his attorney may be deemed inadmissible in court. Although the process of realizing the right to counsel is more difficult in post-conviction cases, the U.S. Constitution still guarantees it. The jurisprudence on the matter, however, is few and, particularly because many of those convicted are no longer interested to make appeals. Nevertheless, guided by the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court had decided to define the limitations and protect the right in United States v. Tucker in 1972, in Douglas v. California (1963) and Mempa v. Rhay (1967) (NLADA, n.d.). These assert that indigent defendants may still have the right to counsel even as they make appeals on their conviction. List of References Burgan, M. (2007). Miranda v. Arizona: The Rights of the Accused. Minneapolis, MN: Compass Point Books. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335. U.S. Supreme Court. Retrieved 19 June, 2011. . NLADA. History of Right to Counsel. National Legal Aid & Defender Association. Retrieve 19, June 2011. . Tomkovicz, J. (2002). The Right to the Assistance of Counsel: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Right to Counsel Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The Right to Counsel Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“The Right to Counsel Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Womens Right (Equal Right Amendment)

...?Women’s Liberation through the Equal Rights Amendment The enduring struggle of women for their emancipation and for the attainment of equality remains a significant portion of the history of humankind. The fervent effort to eradicate the patriarchal set-up of societies and the culture of machismo therein overwhelmed the female species throughout time. This synchronized and yet sporadic movement by women activists, suffragists and liberationists precipitated for the advent of an epic legal victory that resulted benefits that scores of generations of women have enjoyed. In this paper, the author will outline, examine and interpret the women’s rights movement in America. Of particular importance here is the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Legal Counsel Exercise

...? Legal counsel exercise Discussion Under the Constitution, the U.S President has the powers to order military attacks against any State, person or organization suspected of planning or involved in any form of terrorist attacks on the U.S, its citizens and property. When the U.S government learns of your plans, the President has the power to order military attacks against you. His actions re justified both by the Joint Resolution and Wars Powers Resolution passed by Congress in 2001. The President is empowered to deploy military attacks against any terrorist organizations, persons or States that either support or harbor them. This he can do whether or not the organization, person or state can be linked to any specific...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Criminal Law : Defense Counsel Perspective

...the accused regarding their right to counsel, they do not expose the truth, which is the defense counsel’s duty. This is a criminal law paper on a defense counsel perspective. Criminal defense counsel is involved in issues that revolve around the investigation of crimes and charges, as well as the arrest (Acker & David 34). An arrest is not indicative of a formal statement of statement of criminal charges from the court; rather it indicates that the person is under reasonable suspicion regarding a crime. Criminal counsel will also work out the crime’s substantive issues that their clients are charged with, as well the prevention of...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Who has the right to counsel another person

...? Who has the Right to Counsel another Person? By Counseling is an important field in the broader field of psychology. Counseling has existed over the years, even in different cultures, before being adopted into academics. This simply reflects on the process of one person seeking advice from another person. This is highly based on social settings, as most problems taken to counseling lie in the areas of work, family, or school, among other social matters. A person, who offers counseling, is referred to as a counselor. However, in the past years, there have risen considerable concerns about what individuals have the right...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

A Right-Versus-Right Problem

...A Right-Versus-Right Problem In APA Style Your School's My Own Experience As a normal human being, I experience simple right-versus-right problems in ordinary days. Some of these I usually brush off, except for some with serious repercussions. Sometimes, I also experience value conflict, in which I find hard to decide between two right alternatives. One particular experience of a right-versus-right decision was when I was still working in the hospital. One of the AIDS patients died so I myself contacted a funeral home to pick up the body. When I asked them if they have known that the patient had HIV/AIDS, it turned out...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Competent to Jay Adams

...Competent to Jay Adams Competent to Counsel by Jay Edward Adams has been acclaimed as one of the ics in the field of Christian counseling and the book has been of high use to pastors, students, laypersons, and Christian counselors to develop a general approach to Christian counseling as well as a specific response to particular problems. Through biblically directed discussions, nouthetic counseling works by means of the Holy Spirit in producing changes in the personality and behavior of the counselee and the various chapters of the book develop a biblical counseling based on a number of important scriptural principles. The first chapter of the book, 'Christianity and Psychiatry today', deals with psychiatry in general... in...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Seek Godly Counsel

...Seek Godly Counsel Handling finances wisely in one’s life is a paramount thing in their future. How one handles their money will largely determine how they budget their day-to-day life. The big mistake that most people do is not seeking God's counsel. One can get these counsels from the bible or talk to godly persons. Most people resort to the result of prayer after seeing that everything else has failed, which, in most cases do not work out. The bible says “cursed is the man who relies on his own understanding.” psalm 1:1 says, “blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the ungodly.” Anyone who is in need of any monetary advice shouldn't seek it from the...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment


...The right to Counsel in the Military Introduction The right to counsel for Courts-Martial is d in the statute governing right to counsel (Section 838(b) of Title 10, US code). This section defines the accused’s right to numerous counsels. The section states that the accused has the right of being represented at court-martial by a meticulous military defense counsel, which is provided at no cost to the accused. The defendant also has the right to appeal, by name, a different military lawyer. The court-martial is designed to try criminal cases though it...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Counsel Retainment

...Retaining Counsel Team A James Anthony, Danelle Phipps, Scottie Benjamin, Stephen Antley, and Trina Jefferson LAW/531 December 4, Kathleen Butler Retaining Counsel Proposal introduction Team A Aircraft Component Manufacturing is a company that traditionally manufactured aftermarket aircraft parts and components that have been used as replacement parts. The company has never produced parts that were used as original parts on new aircraft. The company has recently been awarded a $50,000,000.00 subcontract to produce landing gear components for the next generation of commercial aircraft. Since the company has never retained outside counsel, the team needs to research and recommend a firm that can review the subcontract and serve... as the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Right to Counsel: Critical Stages of Criminal Proceedings

...The Right to Counsel Number Right to counsel The right to attorney refers to the Six Amendment right ofany criminal defendant to effective legal assistance throughout the important stages of their trial. The critical stages include; post-arrest questioning, line-ups, other identification processes, pre-trial hearings, arraignments and plea negotiations. The fundamental right also envisages the fact that some defendants do not have the resources to hire a legal defense counsel, and thus responds by obligating the government to assign one for every defendant or settle the legal expenses incurred by such...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Right to Counsel for FREE!

Contact Us