Nobody downloaded yet

English Torts Law - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Question: Does the idea of proportional liability- that the defendant pays for the chance that her negligence caused the claimant’s injury-serve justice? What is the proper scope of such idea in English Law?…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
English Torts Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "English Torts Law"

Download file to see previous pages The defendant is required under English Torts Law on negligence to compensate the claimant by payment of damages or fine or by heeding an injunction as duly determined by the court. This should effectively deter people from being careless in the conduct of their duties. In a way this intends to enforce a standard of behaviour, to protect the life, welfare, and interest of unwilling victims of another person’s act of negligence. This principle on negligence is not new. In Bible times, the Divine Law dictates that a man could be deemed guilty by his negligence: “In case you build a new house, you must also make a parapet for your roof that you may not place bloodguilt upon your house because someone falling might fall from it.” –Deuteronomy 22:8, The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. Negligence Defined "Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. The defendants might have been liable for negligence, if, unintentionally, they omitted to do that which a reasonable person would have done, or did that which a person taking reasonable precautions would not have done." (Blyth v. Birmingham Water Works English Torts Law on Negligence The Torts Law particularly on negligence has its own precedence from the Divine Law itself. Negligence is one of those torts in which damage must be proved. Once a breach of duty has been established, the claimant must therefore also show that the breach has resulted in injury or damage (the causation issue) and that the injury or damage is sufficiently closely connected to the breach (the remoteness issue). The Tort of Negligence developed in 1932 beginning with the case of Donoghue v Stevenson which established the Duty of Care owed by manufacturers to end consumers. The following elements must be established to warrant the claim of negligence: 1. There must be a Duty of Care between the claimant and the defendant. 2. A clear breach in the Duty of Care is established. 3. Such breach resulted to some damage to the claimant. 4. There is no applicable defence to the defendant. Duty of Care In the first negligence case (Donoghue v Stevenson), Lord Atkin spoke of the backbone of the duty of care known as the neighbour principle by saying that defendant must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which can be reasonably foreseen would possibly injure a neighbour, one who would closely or directly be affected by any acts or omissions. Lord Atkins stated that: “You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law is my neighbour? The answer seems to be - persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question”. The case of Caparo Industries plc v Dickman in 1990 gave rise to the Caparo three-way test, which is the modern day test for determining duty of care: 1. It is reasonably foreseeable that the claimant may be harmed by the defendant’s failure to observe reasonable care. 2. The relationship of the claimant and the defendant indicates a sufficient relationship of proximity or remoteness. 3. It is fair, just and reasonable to impose on the defendant a duty of care towards the claimant. In 1934 Lord Wright said: “In strict legal analysis, negligence means more than heedless or careless conduct, whether in omission or commission: ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“English Torts Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(English Torts Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“English Torts Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Law of Torts

...? Law of Torts By 26, Mar Introduction Duty of care is a key element, and indeed the foundation of the tort of negligence. The modern concept of the duty of care has its roots in the case of Donoghue V Stevenson.1 In this case, Lord Atkins established that to prove the tort of negligence, the claimant has to cross 3 hurdles, that is, establish that the defendant owed him a duty of care both in law and fact, that the claimant breached the duty of care, and that as result of the breach, the claimant suffered a damage that was caused by the defendants breach (causation). Consequently, for one to establish the tort of negligence, one must establish that the other party was not only careless, but also that there existed a relationship... . But to...
12 Pages(3000 words)Coursework

Torts law problem

..., the Council rejected the proposal, on account of flood risk. Due to the refusal, and no other recourse left with Rhett, he had to sell his land to a local farmer at a substantial loss. Now from the facts above, it is quite clear that, there was injustice meted out to Rhett. Now, the problem that Rhett is facing has a solution in Law of Torts. Law of Torts is the field of law which deals civil harms that may be caused to a person. The concept of negligence is integral to the Law of Torts. The definition of negligence under tort law states that, “the breach of a legal duty to take care,...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Torts Law Problem

... Task Torts Law Problem In the scenario, Cathy may seek a legal redress against MoreeRE under the tort of negligence for misrepresentation or negligent advice. The cause arises as against MoreeRE under the doctrine of vicarious liability that provides that, an agent’s action is binding upon the principle if the employee was discharging his/her duties in the course of employment. In Lloyd vs. Grace Smith & Co, 1 the court held that a principle is variously liable for the fraud of an agent acting for a corporation. By employing this rule, John was an employee of MoreeRE and was making representations for the company in his dealings with Cathy. His actions could therefore be interpreted as being binding upon MoreeRE Company, and thus... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Law on Torts in Australia

...? Torts Law Australia Introduction In the given case scenario, Tom can be identified as the plaintiff, while Officers Derk and Falcon are identified as the two defendants. Violations and Injuries Sustained to the Plaintiff In the given case scenario, Tom suffered a variety of injuries, it can be argued that his property rights were violated since when he had earlier on asked them to vacate his premises, the two officers refused to do so and went on to insist on searching the property. Instead they should have willingly vacated the land and if the need arouse return back later with a warrant allowing them to search the property forcefully in the event that Tom refused them to do so1. The Plaintiff, Tom...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Law of Torts: Negligence

...?Law of Torts: Negligence Negligence pertains to doing or failing to do something that a reasonable person would or would not do under certain situations, which causes injury, damage, or losses to another person as a result (Keenan and Smith 2006). Any person suing for negligence is potentially seeking financial compensation for damages. The compensation is meant to put them in the position they were before the case of negligence occurred. Kelly, Hayward, Hammer and Hendy (2011) note that before a plaintiff can sue a person for damages related to negligence, there are elements that have to be proved before a court of law by the plaintiff. In this case, whether or not negligence has occurred will be a matter of satisfying... against, Jed and...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Comparative Business Law

...Comparison of English Tort Law with French Tort Law: English Tort law is similar to that of other countries of common law such as French law. English tort law is compared with the French tort law in following terms: Codification of law: English tort law is derived from Roman law, which is based on specific heads of tortuous liability, and it is not a codified law. Where as the French...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Law of Torts

...1 Law of Torts I would advise Mr. Andy that his accident occurred in the type of area commonly known for producing similar types of vehicle mishaps, and it will not be necessary for him to prove any type of vicarious liability. It is the duty of the owner to make the property safe. . in the case of McWilliams V. Sir William Arroll 1962, the 'but for' test is applicable on the premise that he (Mr. Andy) would not have sustained the injury but for the breach of the (property owner) defendant. Moreover as in Anns V Merton (1977), Lord Wilberforce proposed a two-staged testonce neighborhood was established, there is a prima facie duty of care, which can only be rebutted on policy ground....
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Torts Law

...Torts law Introduction Liability for negligence is founded on the principles of duty of care, breach of that duty and the resultant damage and loss. The defendant must have been implicated in all these circumstances to become liable. In the instant case, the service provider Family Friendly Fishing had a duty of care to their patrons Mickey and family in that the fishing vessel and accessories should have been kept free from defects especially as the ones involved in dangerous sports. Though the captain of the vessel Neil already warned the service provider of the defective condition of the fishing equipment, the service provider brushed it aside in a casual manner saying no untoward incident had...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Nuisance ( torts law)

...Law of Torts Private Nuisance Introduction “A private nuisance is simply a violation of ones use of quiet enjoyment of land. It doesnt include trespass” (Restatement, 1979). It is an intrusion with an individual’s delight and usage of his land. The law distinguishes that landholders, or those in lawful ownership of land, have the power to the undamaged state of the property and to sensible solace and ease in its occupancy. Private nuisances entail harm to the lands of the complainant of his use of the ownership of such lands. Blackstone describes a private nuisance as "anything done to the hurt or annoyance of the lands, tenements, or hereditaments of another." The forms of private nuisances are almost countless, thus resulting... , like the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Law and Some Questions due to an intentional or criminal action. Lawsuits in tort have alower burden of trying to prove Torts laws can trace their origins from Roman law which was the only law dating past the medieval period to contain provisions on torts which were in the form of delicts. They later influenced civil law jurisdictions in Europe. However, it is important to acknowledge the fact that a distinctive body in law was born in the common law word and it’s traced in the English tort laws. The term tort laws was...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic English Torts Law for FREE!

Contact Us