Nobody downloaded yet

Legal Case of the Caspian Sea - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Introduction The Caspian Sea has been problematic ever since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 to 1992. Before the breakup of the Soviet Union, the Caspian Sea was owned, by treaty, by the Soviet Union and Iran. After the breakup of the Soviet Union, the Caspian Sea was abutted by five different countries – Iran, Russia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.3% of users find it useful
Legal Case of the Caspian Sea
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Legal Case of the Caspian Sea"

Download file to see previous pages Iran and Russia, especially Iran, favor splitting the sea equally among the countries, with each country owning the sea with joint sovereignty. The other countries, however, favor partitioning – they get certain parts of the sea to control for their countries, and the other countries get their own slice of the pie. This describes the conflict in a nutshell. However, the conflict is more complex because other, more powerful countries, like China and the United States, have taken sides. This paper will describe the conflict, along with describing other water based conflicts, in recommending the best course of action for the five countries in dispute over the Caspian Sea. Discussion The dispute over the Caspian Sea has as its genesis the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991-1992. According to Mirfendereski (2001), prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Caspian Sea was the province of only two countries – the Soviet Union and Iran. After the breakup of the Soviet Union, however, the Caspian Sea was abutted by Iran, Russia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan. Further, Mirfedereski (2001) stated that, soon after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the Caspian Sea became a matter of international business, as, in addition to the countries abutting the Sea, other countries, such as the United States and China, developed a strategic interest in the region, because of the Sea’s rich and oil and gas reserves. As Zeinolabedin et al. (2011) states, the Caspian Sea and how it is divided up between the countries is important to the countries, and to the world, because of the Caspian Sea’s resources, particularly in the area of oil and gas. Roberts (2001) states that the issue of the Caspian Sea energy development is dominated by four factors – uncertain oil prices; the geology and geography of the area; the pipeline issue; and the ability of the Turkish government to develop a coherent energy import policy. Before the breakup of the Soviet Union, the Caspian Sea was divided according to agreements made between Iran and the Soviet Union in 1921 and 1940 (Laruelle & Peyrouse, 2009). However, after the breakup of the Soviet Union, this agreement became problematic, although Russia initially proposed, after the breakup of the Soviet Union, that the countries share the Caspian Sea, with the exception of ten miles (Laruelle & Peyrouse, 2009). The other countries, however, did not agree with this plan. This means that, for the new countries which abutted the Caspian Sea, there was not specific guidance on how the Sea should be partitioned. However, Mirfendereski (2001) states that at this time there was, when the Soviet Union was intact, delineations that the Soviet Union had made for the Caspian republics. There was also a division between the Soviet Union and Iran, called the Astara-Hassanqoli line. However, as these delineations meant that Russia had to concede a large portion of the Sea, Russian disputed the Soviet Union delineations, according to Mirfendereski (2001). What Russia was seeking, according to Mirfedereski (2001), was an equal but undivided share of the Sea as a whole, as opposed to partitioning. Iran, whose ostensible partition of the Caspian Sea, per the Astara-Hassanqoli line, deprived it of offshore petroleum deposits, went along with the Russian plan to ignore the Astara-Hassanqoli line and divide the Sea up so that each country had an equal but undi ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Legal Case of the Caspian Sea Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1399354-legal-case-of-the-caspian-sea
(Legal Case of the Caspian Sea Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1399354-legal-case-of-the-caspian-sea.
“Legal Case of the Caspian Sea Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1399354-legal-case-of-the-caspian-sea.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Legal Case of the Caspian Sea

Legal Case Study

...decision. Lambert did commit the crime of theft by fraud, when he promised to marry them and used this promise to have unlawful gain in terms of money from the innocent women. This makes him liable to be punished according to law. Moreover, he committed the same crime consequently without repenting for it. This makes him liable to severe punishment both morally and legally, and therefore an extensive punishment ranging over a period of 24 years is fair and just in his case. From the legal perspective appropriate arguments has been given to the grounds alleged by the defense to prove Lambert innocent. For instance when the defense argued that actions for fraud had a one-year statute of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Legal Case Analysis

...? Legal Cases Analysis Ritchie v. People 1910 and Ritchie v. People 1895 (Testimonial Evidence) The Illinois Supreme Court proceeding that was held in the case of Ritchie v. People in 1895 stated that Section 5 of the Illinois Factory and the Workshop Inspection Statute, which limited women to work not more than eight hours in a factory, was illegal. Thus, it was unconstitutional as it would violate the Fourteenth Amendment according to the United States Constitution. The Illinois Manufacturers Association brought the case forward as a challenge to operation of the office of Factory Inspector. Immediately after the law was enacted, it was highly challenged and parties...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian

... Good and Evil in Prince Caspian Prince Caspian, which is the second book in the Chronicles of Narnia, involve a battle between goodand evil, and much of it parallels the evil of colonization, implying that the colonized natives were the good, and the invaders were evil. Moreover, as in the first book, Aslan the lion represents the ultimate good. The good in the novel is obviously represented by Prince Caspian, Aslan and the children: Lucy, Susan, Peter and Edmund, the bad being represented by Miraz the usurper. Miraz was a part of the group of people, the Telamarines, who had reduced Narnia to a land that is not magical, as all the magical elements have been cleansed from the land. This means that the talking trees and the dwarfs... that...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Legal Case studies

...into it, thus while he may think that this is a battle between "old school" and "new school", it will not pass muster in court. In conclusion, so long as the president of the university can make his decision based upon intelligent feedback and his own wisdom, he is not abusing his discretion. He is in fact working well within his own parameters and there should be no legal consequences, whatever decision he makes. The professor would be ill advised to commence proceedings based upon this fact pattern. Paper 2 In the CPM, read the case Urofsky v. Gilmore and answer Questions 2 and 3 2. The various opinions issued by the en banc court in Urofsky provide an instructive debate, and an interesting...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

International Relations (The Caspian Sea Dispute)

...Introduction This paper exhibits an insight into the international contravention encompassing the pre-eminent region adjoining the Caspian Sea. The origin of the problem dates back to the time when Soviet Union collapsed in the year 1991 and consecutive oil discoveries by the western oil companies ever since then. The oil has been discovered mainly in two countries of the region Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. Despite the efforts of international oil corporations, much of the oil remains undiscovered or un-distilled in the region. This current and future potential of oil breakthrough has provoked concerns of the world to fetch this oil to the international markets. The interest encompassing oil extraction...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Legal case

...THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF STADIUM CONSTRUCTION I. Introduction of the Case A. ment of the Facts On January 12, 1971, in his annual address to the Legislature, Governor Cahill noted the potential of a sports complex in the meadowlands to be occupied by one or more major league sports teams. On April 19, 1971, the Sports Complex bill was introduced and overwhelmingly passed in the Senate by a 28-2 vote and in the Assembly by a 53-6 vote. On May 10, 1971 Governor Cahill signed L.1971, c. 137, the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority Law, now cited as N.J.S.A. 5:10-1 et seq. The act creates the Authority as "an instrumentality of the State exercising public and essential governmental functions." The...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Case Analysis (Legal Methods)

...Read carefully through the speech of L.J Scott in the attached law report of the decision in Mirvahedy v Henley (2003), and answer the following questions (each part of the question will be allocated the percentage of marks indicated in the brackets): (a) What were the material facts of the case? (10%) (b) What was the legal issue(s) which the court had to decide? (10%) (c) What approach to statutory interpretation did L.J. Scott take in his speech? (30%) (d) In what way(s) did he deal with precedents? (30%) (e) What do you think the ratio decidendi of Mirvahedy v Henley is on the basis of reading this speech? (20%) The material facts of the case centre on the liability of the defendants...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Legal Method - Case Summary

...the lower court’s decision was reversed on the basis that the injury was in fact preventable. The Court of Appeal also found that negligence could be inferred. The defendant then appealed to the HKC. Legal Issues The legal issue at the heart of this case was the extent to which the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur can be successfully claimed in relation to the facts of the case and the trial judge’s ruling. Pursuant to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, the defendant would be liable if upon the evidence presented, it was found that the injury complained of, was such that it would not have occurred but for the defendant’s negligence and injury itself was within the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

10 Legal Case briefs

...Case briefs Grade (17th, Nov. Case briefs Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) 2. Procedural History: The case was first heard in a New Hampshire trial court, followed by a petition raised in the Supreme Court, which affirmed the ruling of the first court. 3. Facts: Chaplinsky applied abusive words towards a city marshal; calling him a God damned racketeer and fascist. These abusive words were used in a public place. 4. Issue(s): The issue is whether the application of the statute in Chaplinsky case violated his rights for free speech as provided under the first amendment of the US constitution. 5. Reasoning: The reasoning applied under this...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Analysis of Caspian Sea Oil Controversies Article

...in developing Caspian oil resources. They were also not sold on the legal status of the Caspian Sea to accommodate Azeri interests. In retaliation, the Aliyev government went ahead to conclude the “oil deal of the century” with Western companies, but still including Russian LUKoil. Shoumikhin reports that the agreement signed stipulated that “Chirag, Azeri and Ghuneshli deposits will be jointly developed and exploited by members of the consortium for the next 30 years. Overall production through this period is expected to reach 511 million tons, with 258 million tons belonging to Azerbaijan. Out of $8 billion in proposed investments, $7.4 billion will have to come...
12 Pages(3000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Legal Case of the Caspian Sea for FREE!

Contact Us