Nobody downloaded yet

The Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake. Discuss - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 was a Constitutional Mistake? – An Analysis Introduction Of late, there has been wide public debate in UK over the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) (hither in after will be referred as HRA). Due to three high-profile cases namely the Afghani hijacker’s verdict1, the Chahal2 case and the Anthony Rice3 case which made the critics to vehemently argue that HRA, or the style in which it is being construed, is barring the UK Government from guaranteeing the safety and rights of the general public, and hence it should be either amended or repealed…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
The Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake. Discuss
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake. Discuss"

Download file to see previous pages Thus, HRA has altered the style in which the UK courts would approach the domestic legislation. Further, the opponents of the HRA vociferously argue that since the rights violation is already covered under the common law, there is no need to legislate separate law namely HRA. The critics argue that the Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake." This essay will discuss why there is a need to repeal the current form HRA in an analytical way and arrive at a conclusion. Whether the Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake? Two main allegations charged against HRA is that it politicises the judiciary and take away the legitimate authority enjoyed by the elected representatives, and it advocates a blame or compensation acculturation whereby society turns to be progressively more contentious5. One of the serious allegations against the Human Rights Act 1998 is that it remains as a hazard to public safety and rights. For instance, immediately after 9/11 attack in USA, the then British Home Secretary made an open warning to the judiciary to cease applying the HRA in ways, which frustrated the UK government plans. The leader of the conservative party is of the opinion that suitable amendments should be made in the HRA to deport those who were encouraging terrorism in UK soil as the HRA was demonstrating to be a barrier to safeguard the lives of UK citizens. Conservative party is of the opinion that HRA has created a culture that has hampered law enforcement machinery and the control of convicted criminal and obstructed the deportation of terrorist suspects. Conservative is also of the opinion that HRA has not succeeded in safeguarding the corrosion of the traditional liberties and may have even offered a facade of respectability. Lord Chancellor during March 2009 viewed his anguish that HRA has been commoditised which was corroborated by those who stressed their privileges in a selfish way without having concerned with the privileges of others. Critics are of the view that HRA is more concerned with rights thereby totally neglecting responsibilities from UK citizens. Further, there has been ongoing discussion, whether or not the HRA has clouted the exact balance between the courts, Parliament and the executive. Critics have come against the provision in the Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and deportation of terrorists which have placed the safety of the public at peril. Some critics vehemently argue that there should be a referendum, whether to retrench the Human Rights Act 1998 or not. Some critics have argued that there should be a referendum on any scheme to withdraw the HRA or to introduce the Bill of Rights which would basically cement some freedoms of individuals6. HRA will extremely impact statutory interpretation. HRA offers the court with the power and obligation to interpret and apply the law in a style that caters the ECHR obligations. It is alleged that HRA falls short of authorising UK courts to annul legislation, which is not compatible with the ECHR. Clause 3 demands the UK court ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake. Discuss Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The Human Rights Act 1998 Was a Constitutional Mistake. Discuss Essay)
“The Human Rights Act 1998 Was a Constitutional Mistake. Discuss Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake. Discuss

Human Rights Act 1998

...provide finality to Parliament. However, they also permit the courts to undertake constitutional review, and this is akin to the powers made available to the Supreme Court of the United States of America. There are several important facts that are to be taken into consideration. 6 The first of these is that all final declarations of incompatibility either have been addressed by the Government of the UK or are in the process of being resolved. Despite delay in some instances, there is not a single instance, wherein the Government has ignored an issue or declared that it would not remedy it. This makes it politically impossible to challenge the courts in the UK. In addition, the Human...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

The Human Rights Act 1998 and Parliamentary Sovereignty “disapply” or “invalidate” those statutes.5 Moreover, Parliament reserves the right to repeal the Human Rights Act 1998 under the auspices of Parliamentary sovereignty.6 Feldman takes a similar position to that of Goldsworthy. Feldman argues that the Human Rights Act 1998 does introduce “substantive, constitutional values” via the umbrella of Convention rights.7 According to Feldman’s argument, despite the fact that the 1998 Act introduces new constitutional and substantive values, they are not...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Human Rights Act 1998

...?“By the use of case law, critically assess the extent to which the domestic courts have used the Human Rights Act 1998 to enhance the protection of human rights in domestic law” Introduction In 1998, Parliament enacted the Human Rights Act, which had expressly given effect to Convention rights. Previously, Convention rights under the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms had only indirect application in the UK, when courts voluntarily refer them in their decisions, but domestic...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

The Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention

...of the Human Rights Act 1998." The Cambridge Law Journal 67.1: 8-10. Kavanagh, A. (2006). "The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication Under the Human Rights Act 1998." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26.1: 179-.  McGoldrick, D. (2001). "The United Kingdom's Human Rights Act 1998 in Theory and Practice." The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50.4: 901-.  Satvinder, S. J. (2006). "Constitutionalising Rights without a Constitution: The British Experience Under Article 6 of the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Analysis of Human rights Act 1998 the normal persons. The question is whether their rights are being protected aptly or not is a crucial question before the Law. Rights of the suspects under Human Rights Act Before we wrap up an assessment regarding the violation of suspect rights during the interview by the police we shall have a close look into those rights given to the suspects by the Act. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A guide to the Human Rights Act...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Human right act 1998

...The situation that Heather and Len are in is not an unusual one, as retirement homes are notorious for their human rights violations against the elderly. At various times throughout history, however, they have gotten away with these violations if they were a private sector company that was providing a public service. This is no longer the case, though, as private companies must now be more accountable for their actions. In this situation, three different human rights violations are being made against Len and Heather. First of all, they are not being permitting to maintain their family life, as they are being forced to live apart. This is a violation of Article 8 of the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Human Rights Act 1998 6(3)(b)

..., is nonetheless oppressive to universal ideology of the Human Rights. Thus the actual impacts of exercise of such rights are important to the present condition, which shall indicate where our future is headed. Hermeneutics of law is an important step towards grasping the closest interpretation of an evolving constitution that exist side by side to so many case law challenges. To accommodate international or rather European Convention of Rights' incorporating Human Rights law nationally the British Constitution must also revise its fundamental problems of laws full of gaps. The Leonard Cheshire3 case...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Human Rights Act 1998

...of review and a large number of administrative tribunals dealing with statutory appeals from decisions of public bodies. Thus it is possible to see that the British Constitution is largely unwritten to date with the exception of the new review powers for the courts introduced by the Human Rights Act 1998. The Act goes a long way in securing the rights and freedoms of the British Citizens in a many ways.In particular the recently promulgated Human Rights Act 1998 makes it unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

The Human Rights Act 1998

...of the of the of the The Human Rights Act 1998 has made judges the ultimate arbiter of the balance to be struck between the individual and the society. This is a retrograde step. The modern constitutional State functions on the very important theory of the separation of powers. As per the provisions of this theory, the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary form three separate and distinct divisions of government. This promotes a system of counter checks and balances, which thwart the abuse of power. The consequence of this theory is that the Judiciary and its components, the individual judges, can discharge their professional responsibilities without...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Human Rights Act 1998 s 3 s 4

...Human Rights Act of 1998 Introduction: Within the UK, the European Convention of Human Rights was not directly relevant to sta y interpretation1 until the introduction of the Human Rights Act of 1998. Earlier, individuals seeking redress for violation of their fundamental rights as laid out under the Convention, were forced to directly approach the Human Rights Court at Strasbourg, however the Human Rights Act has introduced the facility of redress within national UK...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Human Rights Act 1998 was a constitutional mistake. Discuss for FREE!

Contact Us