Nobody downloaded yet

Company Law Problem Question - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Company Law 1. Facts of the Case The case under consideration is concerned with a company construed under the Companies Act 2006 because it was founded in 2007. This indicates that all case law applicable to this case must take this into consideration because the Company Act 1985 is not applicable to this case…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful
Company Law Problem Question
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Company Law Problem Question"

Download file to see previous pages The company under consideration, Homemaker Limited had three persons on its board of directors namely Jenny, Louis and Chris. Out of these directors, the most active role was played by Chris who also tended to act as the Managing Director though this was never formally recognized in writing. This indicates that Jenny and Louis were more or less passive directors of the company. Homemaker Limited was construed for construction of homes only, but Chris sought to diversify business into equipment and furniture supply. The shortage of work in the construction industry forced Chris to diversify business but he did not register another company to do so. Instead, the platform of Homemaker Limited was utilized by Chris to supply Easy Birds Limited with equipment and furniture which stands in direct violation of the original constitution of Homemaker Limited. Given the fact that Homemaker Limited was struggling with capital requirements, Chris decided to borrow one and a half million pounds from Star Bank. The transactions with Star Bank were executed by Chris and Louis alone without the consent of Jenny. The mutual agreement that the consent of all directors was required for transactions above one million pounds is clearly violated by the behaviour of Chris and Louis in this regard. Poor performance on the part of Homemaker Limited resulted in losses in the equipment and furniture supply domains leading to contractual failure with Easy Birds Limited. The failure of this gamble meant that Homemaker Limited was unable to deal with its fiscal obligation with Star Bank leading to liquidation of the company. A number of problems emerge in regards to Homemaker Limited and its liquidation. The majority of these problems span the domains of director’s conduct and the validity of transactions that resulted. The discussion provided below will cover these issues in detail relating applicable statutes and their interpretation as per case law. 2. Applicable Law In terms of statutory law the current case’s circumstances are covered by the Companies Act 2006 (which expanded on and replaced parts of the Companies Act 1985). Given the fact that the company Homemakers Limited was registered in 2007, the applicable legal elements will be derived from the Companies Act 2006 alone. This also means that previous positions on certain issues will have been revised even if they were fortified by case law on the matter. One of the largest directions taken by the Companies Act 2006 has been the roles, responsibilities and conduct of directors. The duties of directors had already been expounded by the previous Act but the new Act has consolidated these matters further by codifying principal common law as well as the equitable duties of directors. However, it must be borne in mind that the new Act is by no means an exhaustive account of the duties of directors. This therefore tends to indicate that the duties of directors expounded by common law still survive albeit in a reduced form. The Companies Act 2006 has revisited the domain of director’s duties as per Chapter 2, General Duties of Directors. The Chapter has been divided into an introduction, the general duties of directors and the supplementary duties of directors. The new codifications (in context of the duties of directors) will be used to evaluate the conduct of directors at Homemaker Limited. 2.1. Section 170 – Scope and Nature of General Duties This section serves as the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Company Law Problem Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1396508-company-law-problem-question
(Company Law Problem Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1396508-company-law-problem-question.
“Company Law Problem Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1396508-company-law-problem-question.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Company Law Problem Question

Employment Law Problem Question

...?Employment Law Problem Question Advice to Arinder A detailed examination of the restrictive covenants in Arinder’s employment contract will be made. Restrictive covenants that are triggered after the termination of an employment contract are considered a restraint of trade per se and anti – competitive. Such covenants are void, as they violate public policy. If the employee challenges the validity of such a covenant, it is the responsibility of the employer to prove that the covenant is justifiable.1 PPP will have to defend the use of their restrictive covenant should Arinder contest it. Agreements that prohibit employees from working for a competitor, after the termination of employment are fundamentally void. These covenants... the...
13 Pages(3250 words)Coursework

Land law problem question

...took out alone (Worthington, 2006, 61). Precedents The question here really is where all this leaves you with respect to the property. It is understandable and highly commendable that the original intent of putting up an accountancy firm is not lost on you. This will work well in your favor in case the matter ends up being settled legally. Hopefully, this should not be the case as it is always better to settle this kind of thing out of court. However, if push comes to shove, it is important to consider what has transpired in other cases like this. Reverend Donald Smith and others vs Reverend John Morrison and others [2011] CSIH 52 In this case the Reverend Smith was the moderator of the General Assembly of the Free...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Land Law problem question

...with the principle “equity follows the law” as held in the case of Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17. However, this presumption can be displaced and should not be embarked upon except in cases of unusual nature. Until recently, where purchasers contributed unequally to the purchase price, there was an equitable presumption of a tenancy in common rebuttable by evidence of contrary intention as held in the case of Goodman v Gallant [1986] 1 Fam LR 513. But the recent cases, the House of Lords embarked on the ruling in Stack vs Dowden. It held that equity will recognize a tenancy in common of the beneficial interest where a property is purchased jointly by business partners for commercial reasons in the cases of Barton vs...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Employment Law - Problem Question

...?EMPLOYMENT LAWPROBLEM QUESTION Introduction Employment law defines and regulates relationships between workers and their employers in an employment set up. The branch of law regulates and enforces rights and obligations that are accrued from an employer- employee relationship. This paper seeks to discuss some of the elements of employment law. The paper will explore a case study, to identify the legal principles involved, with the aim of offering legal advice to the involved parties. Issues The case involves three different counts between Christian, an owner of a catering firm and three employees to the firm. In the first count,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

TORT LAW- PROBLEM QUESTION

...?An Analysis of the Case of Kent Ambulance Service's Liability Overview The following is an analysis of the situation, and this memo is prepared for the ambulance company, Kent Ambulance, and its possible liability for damages regarding Sheila, who suffered brain damage because the ambulance did not arrive on time, and Maxine, who owns a shop that was burglarized because the police car that collided with the ambulance driven by Kent did not arrive on the scene in time. In brief, the driver of the police car, PC Swift, was driving recklessly. Ahmed, the driver of the ambulance, was not. Because of the collision, Sheila suffered brain damage that would not have occurred if the ambulance had arrived at the expected time....
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Contract law problem question

...that there was an offer and an acceptance. The question remains whether there was consideration. The general rule is that there has to be reciprocity between the two contracting parties i.e. that a promise should not be able to get anything unless he gives or promises to give something in return to the promisor [Curie v. Misa (1875)]. In our situation, in the agreement between SE and Jayne, SE promised to give 4,000 and in return Jayne attended the training conference. There is however, the issue of the consideration being adequate and whether performance of contractual duties could form sufficient consideration. In the case of the adequacy of the consideration, the law is quite settled here owing to...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Criminal law problem question

...CRIMINAL LAW PROBLEM QUESTION - ACTUS REUS Actus reus, put simply, means 'a guilty act'. This must be present for an offence to have been committed. In the case of murder actus reus must be an act that results in death. In the case of manslaughter, this can be performed in a commission or an omission resulting in death. The most common definition of the actus reus in murder is provided by Edward Coke, who states - "When a man of sound memory and of the age of discretion, unlawfully killeth within any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the King's Peace, . . . so as the party wounded, or hurt, et cetera, die of the wound or hurt, et cetera, within a year and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Criminal Law Problem question

...that Edward, Sarah and Lisa are good friends. In Lowe [1973] Q.B. 702, the parties were an ascendant and descendant. In Stone [1977] Q.B. 354, the parties were in laws. In Adomako6, it was a doctor-patient relationship. In other cases, the duty might arise from a contract like a grossly negligent electrician.7 While there is no authoritative definition of the categories of person who owe a duty to another for the purposes of the law of manslaughter,8 Smith and Hogan, however, stated that "persons who jointly engage in a hazardous activity whether lawful--like mountaineering--or unlawful--like drug abuse--may also owe duties to one another." In the given problem, assuming...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

This is a COMPANY LAW AND CAPITALISM (LLB) problem question; the question is on the assignment criteria field of this application form below

...Legal Advice Clarke Bros Legal Counsel In the matter of: Recent decisions of the Zadok Board Sir: In view of the recent developments and decisions taken by the Zadok Board, we propose to present for your review an examination of the issues that arise in these respects and possible remedial recourse that may be available through an application of the law. The Zadok Company has been incorporated in accordance with Articles in the Table A form. Incorporation therefore involves separation of ownership and control, it is the members who own the company and allot shares, which constitutes a delegation of the shares as spelt out under s.80 to s.96. Amber and Boris are the executive Directors of the Company, but from the perspective... of ethics...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Contract Law Problem Question

...contractual relationship2. Generally the contract law is defined as an agreement that creates obligation enforceable by law. This obligation is based upon the mutual acceptance, consideration, legality and capacity to perform. In this process of conformity, fulfilment and binding, there may arise number of problems if in case contract is not implemented properly or if one party rejects to perform according to the obligations. Thousands of contracts are agreed upon and signed in the world every day and most of them are not performed in their full essence according to the terms3. Whilst many of them are resolved by negotiations and discussions but there comes cases under which hostilities...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Company Law Problem Question for FREE!

Contact Us