This study now seeks to consider the thesis that the international human rights laws and provisions are not serving the general interests of justice. This paper shall discuss this thesis by reviewing instances of human rights violations and how the human rights laws have responded to these cases. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Law, Justice, and Democracy: International Human Rights"
Download file to see previous pages
The paper tells that international human rights are internationally recognized rights inherent and endowed to all human beings. As indicated in Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all people are entitled to rights regardless of their “race, color, sex, language, religion, political, or other opinion or social origin, property or birth status”. Moreover, the endowment of such rights must not be based on the political, jurisdictional, or international status of the country where the citizen belongs. In effect, for countries and territories, the protection of international human rights must be consistent. Despite these clear provisions however, significant gaps in their implementation have been seen throughout the years. Human rights violations have been apparent in various countries and territories and the United Nations and other international governing bodies have not adequately addressed these issues. In other words, the delivery of justice has been questionable. The articles of the UDHR do not include specific provisions for the guidance of the people, especially those who are obliged to implement its provisions. The vague nature of the UDHR also leaves major gaps in implementation and the interpretation and these gaps often have to be filled by those who have to implement its provisions. The UDHR was originally meant as a list of objectives to be implemented by member countries; it was not meant to be part of international law. However, the UN Conventional Conference on Human Rights indicated that the UDHR would be included as a part of international laws. ...
One of the gaps seen in the implementation of international human rights laws is on its decentralization. In countries like Iran and Afghanistan, their laws do not exactly blend well with Western-based international laws, especially when the rights of women are considered (UDHR). As a result, human rights violations have often been apparent against these women when international standards are considered; however, when country-based standards are used, there are no human rights violations. In effect, these countries have not resolved the issue on how to handle these conflicts and the implementation of the international human rights laws seem to be relatively vague and conflicting (Koh, p. 1396). The decisions on these cases often take years to resolve; in the meantime, many more violations are being committed by citizens and government officials alike. This was clearly seen in the case of Afghanistan who was under the Taliban regime for many years until the US troops entered the country after the 9/11 attacks (Hancock, 2007). For years, Afghani men and women suffered under the repressive regime of the Taliban regime and their suffering did not gain sustained international attention; however, when America was attacked on September 11, 2001 and the Taliban proved to be a major supporter of the perpetrator of the attack, major attention was gained by the Taliban group and their actions in Afghanistan. This seems to indicate that the application of human rights practices is unbalanced and vague. Some of the issues in relation to international human rights and the promotion of justice also include the fact that the implementation of the UDHR is based on how vigilant the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
As nations become interconnected, multinational corporations create avenues for interactions with foreign nations bringing the lure of foreign investment and capital. However, critics often associate TNC’s ventures to third world countries as agents of disaster. The process
Allies comprised Great Britain, France and Russia, while the central powers included Germany, Austria and Italy. The war was fought with the objective of gaining balance of power in the world but it did not seem to have served the purpose. The
Analysis of exception to the jurisdiction clauses as discussed in Assanidze v Georgia Article I of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) demands the Member Nations to offer security to every individual within their territory or jurisdiction, and the freedom and rights contained in Section 1 of the Convention.
This sets democracy different from others and makes it more preferred by many. As such, which also leads us to the second premise, democracy, given its democratic institutions and democratic processes and despite its weaknesses, is the best instrument there is today to protect universal human rights.
Accordingly, the same court had earlier awarded 2,000 Euros in compensation to Nadia Eweida, a British Airways attendant who was banned from wearing a cross at work. The court ruled that the employers were justified given their obligations to prevent discrimination against the consumers (Taylor 2).
Human rights are the birth rights of every human regardless of sex, age, Nationality, Religion, political positions/viewpoints, ethnicity, race or colour. Even though a few people have argued that the internalization of human rights laws are strategies of western states used in subjugating and imposing their beliefs on others, the United Nations is actually a global organization that has every nation on earth as a member.
The author states that in the light of the recent developments, it was established that there needed to be strong regulations and major policy changes when it came to dealing with human rights. One thing that was very evident to the period before and during the world war is that human rights were not put into considerations.
Universal human rights usually are voiced and guaranteed by law, in the forms of, customary international law, general principles, treaties, among other basis of international law. The international human rights law regulates how
According to the research findings it can therefore be said that though international human rights law contains many rights for the benefit of mankind but it also has its share of weaknesses and fails to be considered a foolproof law which could be exercised for the optimum benefit of the mankind without any difficulties.