Nobody downloaded yet

Law of Tort - Assignment Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
In tort law, foreseeability is a critical element. In case of strict-liability and intentional torts, foreseeability is considered to be more relevant. Foresee is having the meaning as to know beforehand or to visualise in advance. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.4% of users find it useful
Law of Tort
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Law of Tort"

Download file to see previous pages Under the legal contour, foresee connotes the magnitude upon which something can be known well in advance.
One cannot be held accountable for an injury happened due to one’s demeanour under the negligence in tort unless the risk of that harm was perceptible or foreseeable. In tort, under negligence, the foreseeability is established by a looking into whether the risk of harm is known to the perpetrator through constructive knowledge well in advance. Foreseeability is looked into on what the perpetrator knew or by reasonable assessment of the scenario. In determining what the standard of care owes by the perpetrator, foreseeability plays a significant role. A person will be held accountable for negligence under tort only if he is able to foresee on happening of an event well before .
The origin of duty of care can be said to be derived from the case law Donoghue v Stevenson where the claimant was ill after drinking some of the ginger beer where the remains of a dead snail were noticed .In this land mark case, the manufacture was held liable as he owed a duty of care to the claimants by the House of Lords. In this case, Lord Atkin advanced the “neighbour principle” that one should take adequate care to prevent omissions or acts which one can rationally foresee would likely to injure his neighbour . 2. In Macpherson v Buick Motor Co3, a duty of reasonable care is reposed on all foreseeable consumers of a product and not limited to those in privity of contract whenever it can be foreseeable that damage will result if the product is faulty. For instance, if a washing machine manufacturer supplies a defective product and if A buys the same and sustains harm, then A is definitely a foreseeable consumer for defective washing machine manufacturer. Hence, under Macpherson, the manufacturer owes a duty of reasonable care to A under tort law4. It is to be noted that in Smith New Court Securities v Citibank5 , for the recoverable damage, the test for foreseeability was extended whereas it was not extended in an action in deceit, which is another tort of negligence6. In a negligent action, to establish the element of duty, it is essential to prove that the defendant owed an obligation to the plaintiff who suffered harm. Thus, the duty of care by the defendant should be owed not only to the plaintiff but also will include the others within a certain magnitude along with the plaintiff due to the actions of the plaintiff. Under the zone of danger concept, there is a duty on the defendant that he should reasonably foresee or expect his actions to impact. Thus, if an injury has happened beyond the zone of danger and no negligence can be shown, then the defendant owes no duty to others. For the weird chain-reaction or remote incidents, there can be no recovery for injuries from the defendant7. If the defendant demeanour proximately created harm to the plaintiff, then the occurrence shall be held to be non-remote, and if it is not, then, it is said to be happened remote. Under the world-at-large concept, defendant is needed to foresee more remote chances of harm to individuals not in the adjacent area and of harms not as willingly predictable to happen from his demeanour. Under this concept, the defendant is anticipated to recognise all individuals in the adjacent a ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Law of Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Law of Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words)
“Law of Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
ghowell added comment 9 months ago
Student rated this paper as
This assignment was always my weak point. I could never finish it on time. Still, after I found this precise document, I understood how it should be completed. So, I performed my research afterward and completed the assignment in several hours, instead of weeks as it was previously.


Law of Tort

...? A tort may be defined as one person’s interference with another’s rights, either through intent, negligence or strict liability (Brown et al, 1993). Thus, under the tort law, every person is entitled to certain rights and these include the right to be free from bodily harm, the right to enjoy a good reputation, the right to conduct business without unwarranted interference and the right to have one’s property free from damage or trespass. Negligence is an accidental or unintentional tort which occurs quite often in society. In order to succeed in tort suit for negligence as reflected by the case of Capiro Industries vs. Dickman (1990), the plaintiff must prove the existence of all of the following statements: The defendant owed... the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay


...A tort law can be described as a civil wrong not arising from a contract and in the case of negligence, one should owe due consideration to one’sneighbour (Capiro Industries vs. Dickman 1990). It generally refers to the duty of care owed by somebody to his or her neighbour. Cooke (2010) suggests that in the event that it can be proved beyond any reasonable doubt by the court that the plaintiff has suffered a civil injustice, a claim can be raised and a remedy in the form of compensation can be instituted. In this case, negligence is a common form of tort law which can be punishable if carelessness is proved and the victim will be entitled to get compensation. Failure to...
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay

Law of Tort

...?Question Private Nuisance Winfield’s definition of private nuisance as the unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it1, captures the common law development of the tort of private nuisance. Professor Winfield’s definition of private nuisance is broad enough to cover an indefinite category of interferences with another’s use or enjoyment of land or rights in connection with it. In fact, Gearty describes the development of the tort of private nuisance as becoming increasingly “confusing”.2 However, an examination of developments at common law suggest that the courts have attempted to qualify the definition of...
14 Pages(3500 words)Coursework

Law of Tort

...of obvious risks.24Moreover, even if WRC is found to be liable, Sarah’s right to recovery would be reduced under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 because she failed to take reasonable care in running in a railway at a presumably busy time of day.25 The sign seeking to exclude liability however is void under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 is void. By virtue of the 1977 Act liability cannot be excluded for personal injury cannot be excluded where the premises is a business.26 However, since it is unlikely that WRC will be found liable for Sarah’s injury, the question of exclusion of liability will not be relevant. Bibliography Textbooks Harpwood, V. Modern Tort Law,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Law of Tort

...?LAW OF TORT GRADE 8TH DECEMBER Introduction to Law of Tort A tort can be defined as an action done by one person and that causes harm, damage or an apprehension to another. Therefore, the law of tort establishes the circumstances in which a person’s interests have been harmed by another and how he can be compensated through the civil courts (Harlow, 2005). A tort should therefore be differentiated from a crime. In a tort, the injured party should be compensated by damages but a crime leads to criminal proceedings. Crime is as a result of breaking the law (Adamson & Morrison, 2011), but a tort may not be as a result of breaking the law hence; it necessarily may not be a criminal wrong. Torts can be classified into three categories... injury....
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Law - Law of Tort

...?Law of Tort As a branch of civil laws, law of tort came into existence at the beginning of the nineteenth century although most developments in the subject were achieved later. The law of tort is concerned with civil crime unlike the common branch of criminal laws. The law is concerned with claims where the defendant has broken important responsibilities imposed by the common law leading to losses or injuries (Yeats, Giliker, & Luckham, 2005). In most cases, people who have suffered injuries apply law of tort to seek compensation as...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Law of Tort Article

...TORT LAW A tort law has several aspects that make it different from criminal law. Criminal laws are prosecuted on behalf of society. All fines paid will go directly to the government. In regard to tort law, the injured party will sue the aggressor for causing the injuries and any damages awarded will go directly to the injured party. Another difference between the two types of laws is that in criminal proceedings, proof beyond a reasonable doubt is required to obtain success in winning a case. In a tort case, success can be achieved by providing proof based on a...
5 Pages(1250 words)Article

The Law of Tort

...The Law of Tort: Trespass To The Person Introduction The Tort of Trespass to the person originates out of criminal law and involves a number of actionable wrongs. These wrongs are primarily concerned with the direct and often intentional invasion of a person and/or his property.1 The criminal law origins of the Tort of Trespass are evident in its deterrent rather than compensatory nature. For instance a claimant can sustain an action in trespass and not in negligence notwithstanding that he or she has not incurred damages.2 Bridgit Dimond explains that: "Unlike an action for negligence, an action for trespass is actionable without...
20 Pages(5000 words)Case Study

Law of Tort adhere to guidance noted, does not constitute negligence. A valuer will be considered acting in a manner that is negligent if he does not take the reasonable measures to make sure that his knowledge is updated. Works Cited Bailis, Daniel S. "Estimating Liability Risks With The Media As Your Guide: A Content Analysis Of Media Coverage Of Tort Litigation." Law and Human Behavior (1996): 419-429. Barnes, Jeb. "In Defense Of Asbestos Tort Litigation: Rethinking Legal Process Analysis In A World Of Uncertainty, Second Bests, And Shared Policy-Making Responsibility." Law & Social Inquiry (2009). Blackstone, W. "Tort." Netherlands International...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

Law of Tort

...Law of Tort I. Introduction Our English law provides for a venue for redress a legal wrong in the law of tort. The law of tort provides for remedies to parties who have suffered losses or injuries as a consequence of the either the intentional or the negligent act of another party. In the law of tort, in order for the agrieved party to claim damages under this law, the duty of care must be establist between the parties. There must be a clear connection between the parties that the act or the omission of the other party will have some grave consequences on the other....
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Law of Tort for FREE!

Contact Us