Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816 - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In modern days, the rule of law is a critical part of administrative law and is one of the most important principles that regulate common law countries…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.6% of users find it useful
Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816"

Download file to see previous pages 8). Cane (2011, p. 15) explains that as a legal maxim, the rule of law implies that decisions made by the government should be based on the existing legal principles; it insists that law should govern the society. The proponents of the rule of law argue that it is the foundation of society’s order and freedom since it treats all citizens as equals and therefore none is above the law, not even the rulers. In broader terms, the rule of law implies that the state should subject its citizenry to the laws that were publicly promulgated, no one within a given state should be above the law, and legislative function and the adjudicative functions of the state should be separate from each other. These terms are essential in ensuring that the rule of law is adhered to, fundamental rights of the citizenry are protected, and the powers of the government are limited. Pollard, Parpworth and Hughes (2007, p. 11) argue that contemporary constitutional democracy could be impossible in the absence of the rule of law. However, in some cases democracy and the rule of law are not in harmony. It is against the background of the rule of law that this discussion will focus on it and its main features with specific reference to Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816. An English Law Commentary on this case will attempt to bring the concept of rule of law and its main features into focus with the aim of enhancing understanding of the concept. Since the time the phrase “rule of law” was coined, there has been divergence of understandings with people giving varying explanations of what the phrase really is and what it fundamentally implies. Ranjan (2011, p. 22) notes that there are two divergent views regarding the phrase, majorly. The first one is that it goes beyond legal framework and includes substantive rights that are derived from, or based on the rule of law. The second view is that the rule of law does not focus on how just the law is but rather defines certain procedural characteristics that an existing legal framework should have so as to comply with the rule of law (Ranjan, 2011, p. 23). The divergence of understandings notwithstanding, there are key aspects of the rule of law that are agreed upon by the majority of people and entities; it is agreeable that rule of law is a governance principle in which all entities, persons, and institutions, whether private or public are accountable to publicly promulgated laws which are in conformity with international human rights standards, independently adjudicated, and enforced equally. In addition, it is agreeable that under the rule of law everyone is equal before the law, there is separation of powers, there is legal certainty, supremacy of law principles are adhered to, there is participation in decision- making, legal and procedural transparency principle is adhered to (Cane, 2011, p. 16). The aspects of the rule of law described above are in general terms and only give the general features of the concept. So, what are the main features of the rule of law? As has been noted, people have different interpretations about the concept of rule of law (Ranjan, 2011, p. 29). However, this does not mean that the fundamental features of the concept has been lost; actually, these different interpretations are derived from the main features of the concept. In modern times, the concept of the rule of law and its features was propounded by a British Philosopher and Jurist, Albert Dicey, and that is why it is not uncommon to find rule of law ...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816 Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Wilson V First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816 Essay)
“Wilson V First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816 Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816

August Wilson as One of the Greatest African American Playwrights

Born in 1945, August Wilson was raised in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. He lived in a two-room apartment behind a grocery store on Bedford Avenue. At fifteen he quit high school, choosing to educate himself at the Carnegie Library. After working a bunch of assorted jobs, he began writing poems at twenty. Being raised in a time of segregation, then coming of age in the era of the Civil Rights Movements must have affected him deeply. Just from reading Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, the reader can see the racial oppression Mr Wilson must have felt throughout his life being an African American male.
Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom opened on April 6, 1984, at the Yale Repertory Theater in New Haven, Connecticut. The cast included Richa...
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Moffetts Concept of Trust

Several formalities have been associated with the development of the trust, most of which have been formulated with the intent to prevent fraud and misappropriation in the transfer of property, especially from the point of view of payment of taxes, stamp duties and such related fees for the capital wealth. While trust law is said to be administered based on principles of equity, the reality has been quite different and the results of adjudication in trust disputes have been primarily ad hoc, conditioned from a financial perspective rather than to establish any distinct equitable principles. In fact, the law of formalities has created inflexibility in some cases and there have been instances where the interests of beneficiaries hav...
13 Pages (3250 words) Research Paper

Comparison of Constructive Trust with the Remedy of Restitution under the Common Law

When trying to locate the property loss because of a transfer made under a breach of trust, there are certain issues that need to be taken into account. At the first level, the remedies available by the relevant legal texts tend to differentiate not only regarding their requirements but also their level of protection provided. On the other hand, the application of the rules of common law instead of the ones of equity has to be considered thoroughly and the party that suffered the damage has to evaluate all the parameters regarding his choice as each of the above legal paths has its own advantages. From a general point of view, it has been stated that ‘a person who confers a benefit, normally a money payment, under a mistake,...
12 Pages (3000 words) Case Study

Faith and Works - Comparison of James 2:14 and Romans 4

While the apostles James and Paul agree that Faith connotes belief in God and Works connotes good actions, James contends that faith and works are both essential for salvation, while Paul asserts that faith is the only requisite.

James is unequivocal in his declaration that “faith by itself if it has no works, is dead” (2:17). However, he does not discount the importance of faith. His contention is that both are essential and one, without the other, is futile. He is addressing Christians, who, we may assume, are already among the congregation of the faithful, by virtue of their professed belief “that God is one” (2:19). Therefore, James accepts that faith is a precondition for salvation but asser...
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Analysis of Trust Law Case

Once the court is satisfied that the “declarant had the requisite intention it will strive to validate it.”3 Certainty of intention will therefore be the most important element for determining whether or not the letter constitutes an enforcable trust.

Assuming that the trust held by the trustees under the father’s will trust in favor of Sally and the trust agreement in respect of the horse are valid trusts the question of cetainties are not valid except to the extent that a new trust is created in favor of Sally’s children and thereby extinguishing the previous trusts. This is particularly so with respect to the will trust. The trust agreement over the horse only involves the disposition of a ben...
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Analysis of the Case of Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders Association Ltd

There were several basic legal provisions that gave direction to the formation of a company in the United Kingdom. It has its original foundation in 1844 when the Joint Stock Companies Act1 1844 was formulated. It has given regulations for facilitating the formation of companies by "deed of settlement". Gradually, the shareholder concept was initiated in 1855 by the general incorporation procedure in the name of Limited Liability Act2 1855. This has offered limited liability to shareholders and provided identification to the company as a separate legal persona. The doctrine of limited liability postulates that a company shall be liable for the debts that it incurs, and even if it undergoes closure for any grounds, creditors cannot...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Henry V by Shakespeare and the Rover by Aphra Behn

Henry V recognizes that his kingship is not a rule of lavishness but a rule of service. Summarising everything of what Henry is, Nym, a commoner, and thief, claimed: “The King is a good King…” (Shakespeare, Henry V)
Second, his glib of tongue he uses to empower his soldiers, to give life and courage to his downtrodden men. He does not use his eloquence to deceive nor to perpetuate lies. Rather, he uses his articulateness to restore the bravery of his soldiers, to supplicate God in his favor. All of which is a recognition that Henry V values more the camaraderie that he has with his soldiers above anything else. And this he succinctly shows even as a young King. He said to his men as they are about to fight...
7 Pages (1750 words) Book Report/Review

The Case of R v Turnbull

The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

International Affairs v. Liberalism

As a matter of fact, Hoffman’s statement that “international affairs is the nemesis of liberalism” has a grain of truth in it and this is especially so after the 9/11 incident.
There are two schools of thought or perspectives that are used to view international affairs: liberalism and realism. The study of these two perspectives is significant to the idea posed by Stanley Hoffman because they determine the reasons why international affairs, according to him, does not only see eye-to-eye with liberalism but seems to stand on the opposing side of it.
Liberalism can be defined as having four elements: citizens; the legislature; property rights, and; a market-driven economy (Dunne 186). Realism, on the othe...
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2004] 1 AC 816 for FREE!

Contact Us