Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This research is being carried out to evaluate and present claims for damages arising from the tort of negligence. The researcher of the current study highlights two major types of damages namely general damages and special damages…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.9% of users find it useful
Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence"

Download file to see previous pages

The paper tells that in law, any person who has suffered loss or injury has a likelihood of receiving compensation from making a claim of that loss or injury if it can be proved that the loss or injury suffered was partly or wholly as a result of negligent omissions or commissions of certain acts (s) of another party or person. The compensation is aimed at not necessarily making up fully for what had happened to the person but rather to enable the injured party move on with his/her life with less difficulty. If appropriate, claims should be made for damages that arise from a given situation. In the UK, there is legislative provision governing personal injury and loss as well as damages for personal Injury and non-pecuniary loss. Consultation Paper No 140. Damages, in law, are defined as an award often in form of monetary consideration paid to a person who has suffers injury or loss as compensation. Compensation is crucial in most cases since the loss or injury suffered has possibly changed the ability of a person to undertake normal duties or activities hence limiting the ability of that person to meet his or her needs. For instance, compensation is vital in an event that a person has suffered a disability. Also, compensation can make a significant difference to life of person(s) who has lost a relative in an accident by providing financial support to the person(s). Besides, compensation is in some cases necessary to fund medical care for an injury or illness that is ongoing and was caused by the accident in question.
Moreover, compensation or damages is essential in making up for earnings that may have been earned due to an accident caused by another person due to negligence hence denying the person who has suffered the loss ability to earn money to pay his or her bills.4 In order to appropriately advise Cheryl, Lizzie, David and Bellisima Company on whether they have claim/claims for damages arising out of the scenario, and against whom they would make such claims, it is important to understand some aspects of damages that relate to their scenario. First, in their scenario, in an event that their claims become successful they will be entitled to compensatory damages, that is, they will be paid to compensate them for financial loss and injury suffered from the accident. There are two major types of damages namely general damages and special damages.5 General damages are those that aim at compensating the claimant(s) for the specific injury suffered which is of non- monetary nature. These damages are only awarded in claims that have been made by person(s) who have suffered personal injury; for instance, on personal injury caused by negligence of another party.6 Example of general damages include disfigurement, impairment of physical or mental capacity, physical or emotional suffering and pain, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of companionship among others.7 It is imperative to point out that quantifying these damages may prove difficult and judges mostly base awards on amount placed on similar cases previously. Therefore, how do the courts quantify personal injury claims? As has been noted, such quantification is not easy and most judges rely on similar previous cases to award. In the UK, solicitors in most cases refer personal injury as general damages for suffering and pain. Just like most judges, they quantify personal injury claims based on previous awards on similar cases made by the courts.8 The following factors guide quantification of personal injury claims: one, the extent and nature of the injuries suffered; consideration will be made on similarities of the injuries of the case in hand and cases that are similar and had been decided by courts previously.9 Normally, the extent of the injury usually corresponds to the damages awarded; that is, greater injuries will result to greater awards. Since quantifications are based on precedence, decisions of higher courts are always binding to the lower ...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence Essay)
“Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence

The Bolam Test of Negligence

The realistic effect of the test is that a judge will heed substantiation from experts in the suitable speciality and should decide whether the measures of the doctor/midwife/nurse etc. were appropriate. Frequently there are numerous acceptable ways of doing somewhat and conformity with any of these will mean that there was no breach of duty of care. Logically experts frequently disagree over these matters and the judge should decide whose substantiation is to be favored.
Professional men and women are administrated by the standard of care of a normal person of their profession or specialism: the test is the standard of the normal skilled man exercising and admitting to having that special skill. An expansion of this is the s...
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Media Forms and Claims of Cultural Imperialism

First, much of the theory was developed before the massive acceleration in change that has occurred since the development of computers. Second, different forms of media power create an overwhelming complexity that is difficult to fit within the theory. Third, the concept of “cultural imperialism” is ill-defined.
Before delving into the world of media forms and cultural imperialism it will be useful to exactly define how theory can and cannot help in an understanding of economic, cultural, political and social patterns. The concept of “cultural imperialism” moves well beyond any attempt at neatly defined disciplinary boundaries. It is perhaps the very ubiquity of western media in many parts of the world...
11 Pages (2750 words) Assignment

Damages in Torts and Breach of Contract

... which will put the party who has been injured, or who had suffered, in the same position as he would have been if he had not sustained the wrong for which he is now getting this compensation.” There are two types of damages, which can be claimed under tort namely, pecuniary loss and non-pecuniary loss. d. Pecuniary Losses Pecuniary losses arise where there is direct monetary loss incurred by the claimant in case of tort. Unlike in breach of contract where claims for unjust enrichment is totally prohibited13, damages in torts allow for recovery thereof. Accordingly, there are a number of instances where damages in tort can be rightfully claimed namely (a) trespass to land (b) trespass to goods (c) Conversion (d) Nuisance (e) deceit (f...
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Tort Law of the United Kingdom: 3 Problem Questions

Trespass on land, goods, and person is altogether the most common type of tort, but in all cases, the main concern is the allocation of responsibility for whatever losses are sustained. For anyone party to be held responsible for violation of the tort law, the claimant must establish that there is a duty of care and that there has been a breach of that duty to cause damage or loss to the claimant that needs to be compensated by an award of damages. There is a breach of the duty-of-care principle if the defendant is proven to have failed to do what a reasonable person will do in the situation presented.

Francesca was a chambermaid of good standing at Hulton hotel until a regular hotel guest stormed into the manager&rsquo...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Act Tortious: Homeowners File a Tort Claim against a Theme Park

In criminal law, the state is portrayed as the bigger offended party than the plaintiff such that if a defendant is proven guilty the state metes out the appropriate punishment.  It is different in tort cases, in which the plaintiff, whose more popular assignation now is “claimant,” is the victim of the alleged wrong.  Once the defendant is found liable he is directed by the court to pay damages to the claimant or else to desist from the wrongful activity through “injunctive relief.” Compensation and deterrence are two of the four main purposes of a tort, the other two being appeasement and justice (Williams, 1951). 

The types of torts in England and Wales are limited to trespass t...
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

The Distinction Between the Tort of Negligence and the Tort of Nuisance

There are many instances in which establishing a claim in private nuisance does not require proof of negligence and it, therefore, remains necessary to maintain the tort of private nuisance distinct from the tort of negligence. The discussion that follows will demonstrate the necessity by comparing and contrasting both torts.
The tort of negligence is founded on the principles enunciated in the House of Lords decision in Donoghue v Stevenson which essentially defines the duty of care and situations in which a breach of that duty will give rise to a claim in negligence. Lord Atkin explained that we are required to take all necessary precautions to prevent injury to our neighbours. He goes on to fully explain the duty of care i...
17 Pages (4250 words) Case Study

Issues Relating to Medical Negligence

In applying the test, it must be established that it would be reasonable for Doctor Green to have foreseen that the damage to Charles would have been caused as a result of any negligence or misconduct and as such, should have taken precautions against this. If we apply this to the current scenario, it is evident that as a trained medic, Doctor Green would have foreseen that failure to take proper care in diagnosing and treating Charles would result in damage to Charles’ health. This appears to be further bolstered by claims by consultant Doctor Brown that Charles may have healed normally had he been correctly diagnosed and treated by Doctor Green. As regards the liability of Wellington Hospital, as soon as Charles entered We...
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework

Applied Land Law, Contract Law and Tort Law

There seems to be a lack of consideration to accompany the subsequent agreement between the parties for ABC Ltd. to pay the extra ₤10,000. In essence, ‘consideration’ refers to something of value, in a legal sense, flowing from Grabit to ABC Ltd. so as to enable Grabit to hold ABC Ltd. to its promise to pay that extra amount.
Grabit will obviously argue here that they are indeed doing something of value to ABC Ltd by building the extension of the warehouse. However, the problem is that this building of the extension is exactly what Grabit was already contractually bound to do under the ₤200,000 fixed price contract. As seen from Stilk v Myrick1, the general rule is that the performance of an existing contractual d...
11 Pages (2750 words) Assignment

Punitive Damages

It will be significant enough to consider certain lawsuits that deal with punitive damage. Most of them are in fact considering their depth in cases that had long existed in the past with the hope of providing a guideline of handling the same in the modern times as well as future predictions and occurrences.

A substantial methodology, therefore, is vital for a better result in this work. For instance, it will involve adequate research about the same issues related to the topic in question. In this case, the analysis of video sources that contains Arizona Bill that needs amendment is key as well as the research materials that include books and articles with relevant information about the topic.

With all that...
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

The Ethical Claims of Starbucks

... rainfalls and other causes of harvest damage. Company claims, that for future coffee business it’s highly important not to shrink available usable lands in coffee regions. One of the most known Starbucks programs of this kind is C.A.F.E. – Coffee and Farmer Equity. It’s about making ethical sourced coffee. Program is based on: a.) good working conditions; b.) environmentally responsible growing methods. Starbucks takes farmers as partners to a program and for several years helps them to improve their coffee farms. Company has a state of agronomists – scientists and experts in soil management and crop production. For all farmers in C.A.F.E. program there is an agronomist, who controls soil and helps farmers locally by teaching them how...
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Claims for Damages Arising from the Tort of Negligence for FREE!

Contact Us