Nobody downloaded yet

Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers Introduction: Product liability refers to an area of law according to which different business manufacturing companies; distributing agencies, suppliers, as well as the retailers are held accountable in front of the local courts if the products or services they are offering to the public inflict injuries or are injurious to their health…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers"

Download file to see previous pages In US, this trend is forcefully being adopted by many of the consumers who think that they have been harmed by these products and they really decide to take a legal action against those companies. This is the reason that there has been viewed a rapid growth of the litigation of product liability. This has even become an effective tool for the consumers to protect themselves as well as the society from the products that they consider harmful. The law has also been changed in this particular subject, i.e. from caveat emptor which means letting the buyer beware, to the strict liability for the manufacturing defects that the companies make which can also make the product irrational for the customers. Those manufacturers who actually produce or even distribute those products actually take the stance that this product liability has strengthened the customers’ legal representatives and it has also added an extra cost on the products that they are selling. They are also of the view that the harm inflicted to one person is a doubtful issue as there can be other reasons as well that might have inflicted him an injury and not their own product. So the heat is consistently generating across the US as well as other developed countries over the issue of product liability, in which the production companies are strongly opposed to the idea of one customers’ complaint to the court that might shut down even their whole business. What about those issues which are really dangerous for not just the one person but for whole society. The production companies are silent about those issues. The one and thorough example of the limited liability that seriously affects to, is the cigarette manufacturing companies. There are millions of people who want a legal action taken against these cigarette companies to be shut down as even the state laws say that smoking is really dangerous for health. In US in 2009, the most deaths in a year were the reason of the drugs and smoking. This is the reason that US society has now started taking strong actions against the cigarette manufacturing companies in US and this is the reason that now this case has been presented to the court and the hearings are now going on these days. Recently, the justices of the US Supreme Court have added two new cases to their docket which they considered the most serious to the whole society, and the cases were about drug and cigarette liability requirements. General theories concerning product liability: Most of the jurisdictions experience the cause of action of plaintiff to be based on the one or more than theories that they present in front of the judge(s). These theories are basically concerned with the negligence of the companies, breach of the warranty, misinterpretation of the product or service, and the strict tort liability. The negligence of the manufacturing companies actually refers to the irresponsibility, absence, and failure of the companies to exercise properly a care. A manufacturing company can be considered or held liable for the negligence it commits if the lack of the reasonable care in the production of a good, designing, or the assembling of particular good is done improperly, and in which the company is directly involved in causing a harm to its ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/law/1392873-product-liability-http-wwwnytimescom
(Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1392873-product-liability-http-wwwnytimescom.
“Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1392873-product-liability-http-wwwnytimescom.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers

Big Tobacco Sues Feds over Graphic Warnings on Cigarette Labels

... i.e. till the disposal of the case by the court of competent jurisdiction on the question of its legality or illegality. Once the case is decided in favor of the FDA, the tobacco industry would have to spend a considerable amount say millions of dollars to purchase printing equipments to be used for the new labels on the packs, which would definitely be a direct bearing on their profitability (Henningfield, Rose & Zeller, 2006). The promulgated law has given the unilateral authority to FDA to keep an eye on cigarette manufacturing companies in connection with the printing of graphic images on the packs of cigarette and on the product related advertisements. This has further empowered the government to monitor the activities... as the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Product Liability and Intentional Tort

...?Hypothetical Issues on Product Liability and Intentional Tort Hypothetic Product liability issues in the case Chase’s hypothetic case of injury by the paper shredding machine within the work place touches on whether Chase should be compensated for personal injuries caused by the machine. Product liability law is a division of tort law which seeks to a cause of action against the product’s manufacturer, seller or designer in situations where a person is injured by the product. Over the years, product liability law has...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim

...?Running Head: PRODUCT LIABILITY LAW SUITS Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Insert Insert Grade Insert 10 June 2012 Introduction Product liability lawsuits make manufacturers of goods compensate consumers in case their goods and products become defective. This means that when unsafe products harm an individual, he may have a cause of action against the manufacturer, the person who designed it or the seller. In the United States, for instance, product liability suits are effective tools for consumer...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Warranties and Product Liability

...injury must have privity of contract with the negligent manufacturer. The MacPherson rule extends to "those third parties who are in the vicinity of probable use" (JSTOR Org. 1940, p.163). But in the case of biscuits from China that are laced with formalin, the victims of such cannot sue for damages on the basis of negligence but on the tort of fraud if there is premeditated disguising of the Warranties 7 product as contained in its label as free from any harmful contaminant. This is fraudulent misrepresentation that makes the manufacturer...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Product Safety and Product Liability

...on the producer based on the tortious laws of the country where the harm or damage occurred. This concept of liability adopted by the Roman II Regulations becomes problematic when determining the producer of the product when they are applied in cases of injury or harm caused by the products obtained from e-commerce. This is because for liability to ensue, the claimant must first be able to identify the producer of the product so that a tort claim can be initiated against him. Article 2 of the Rome II Regulations defines a producer as the manufacturer of a finished product, the maker of a component or...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Product Liability

...that they are poorly regulated they should be held liable for injuries caused by use of the products. Retailers should do research before importing to ensure they only get raw materials that are well regulated (Feinman, 2006). Such a policy has negative effects to U.S businesses. The businesses experience huge losses especially if a case is filed against them, and they are supposed to compensate the affected individuals. The businesses do not receive any compensation, but are required to pay compensations thus experience huge losses. Their name is also tarnished by the defective products that circulate in the market (Feinman, 2006). The U.S retailers and Manufacturers...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Product Liability Lawsuit against Toyota

...Product Liability Lawsuit against Toyota With the emergence of the concept of societal marketing, the deviation between quality and expectation has been narrowed down. The awareness extent among the customers or purchasers has created a real deal for manufacturers as well as for the law enforcement authorities. In the near past, history sighted a very strange phenomenon with a vehicle manufacturing company which is one of the top car manufacturers. It is the turn point towards Toyota incorporation (Rowe, 2011). They had to call the sold vehicles back due to foot break design fault. The issue was basically raised back in 2009 after a horrible accident in San Diego that killed a family of four members who were travelling in Lexus... level...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Ford Pinto Product Liability Case

...on a specific accident. In contrast, the risk/benefit analysis the defendant used in discarding the safer design required a whole examination of the product’s costs, risks and benefits when under use. Thus, the lower court found the organization guilty of negligence in designing the fuel tank of the Ford Pinto car. Consequently, the product liability that was found against Ford Motor Company in its Ford Pinto product was both design defect failure to warn. Indeed, the nature of the case reveals that the organization was guilty of design defect instead of manufacturing defect or failure to warn. This is because the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Cigarette product called F&H cigarette in China and UK

...Launching a Cigarette Product Called F&H Cigarette Grade Introduction Marketing is concerned with communicating the value of a brand, service or product to customers, for the main aim of promoting and selling that brand, service or product (Kotler and Armstrong 1991). The techniques that are employed in marketing by marketers include choosing market segmentation and targeting a market through analysis of the market, in addition to understanding the behaviour of consumer and promoting a product’s value to consumers. Marketing activities like promoting a product in marketing is different from production or...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Product Liability Case

...socket and ball to fuse, severely restricting shoulder motion. As a result, she filed a product liability suit against I-Flow Corp, which manufactured the “PainBuster” device. In this case, she asserted that the device had not received FDA approval for use in such cases, arguing the product’s manufacturer was liable for the sale of this product despite not giving adequate warning and was, therefore, unreasonably dangerous (Moylan, 2015). There is no mention of the insurance company in the article, which might be explained by the fact the case was initially thrown out and the insurance...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers for FREE!

Contact Us