Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil - Essay Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
The essay considers the wide range of circumstances where the corporate veil can be pierced and this can be both under statute and at common law. Finally, the paper attempts to evaluate the reasons why the courts decide to lift the veil and in other instances keep it firmly drawn down. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil"

Download file to see previous pages This essay talks about an association of persons or an organised body can acquire legal personality in the few ways that are recognised by the law. There are mainly three ways in which this can be effected and these are: by way of separate Act, general enabling Act or by conduct. Legal personality can be acquired by virtue of separate Act obtaining within a particular legal framework of a given country or in terms of a general enabling Act such as the Companies Act which is used in many countries. This is modelled under the English common law. Many of the English common law of companies were readily accepted by different countries which adopted this form of law as their guiding principle in the legal framework and these were also accepted by the courts with little or no modification. It can also be seen that an association of 20 persons can also acquire legal personality by conducting itself as a legal person in compliance of certain requirements. On its formation, the company as a separate entity acquires the capacity to have its own rights and duties. Once the company has been incorporated, it can be treated as an independent person with rights and liabilities that are appropriate to itself. The brief facts of the leading case were as follows: Salomon was the sole proprietor of the prosperous company and he decided to turn the business into a limited company after realising its great potential. Salomon received £10 000 in debentures from shareholders which were secured by a bond of the company’s assets. ...
The brief facts of the leading case were as follows: Salomon was the sole proprietor of the prosperous company and he decided to turn the business into a limited company after realising its great potential. Salomon received ?10 000 in debentures from shareholders which were secured by a bond of the company’s assets. However, the company faced a downturn of events and had to be liquidated through the sale of the assets. The sale of assets was far short to cover the debentures whereby the liquidator suggested that creditors had to be paid first before the debentures. Thus, the shareholders were left in the cold. Apparently, the court ruled in favour of Salomon on the reasonable ground that the company was just like Salomon. It was treated as an individual person. This given scenario aptly illustrates the magnitude to which this the concept of legal personality has come under criticism for shielding the erring company directors. Though it is generally accepted that upon incorporation, the company comes into existence as a separate entity, many divergent views have emerged which challenges the legality of this particular concept in as far as the operations of a particular company are concerned. Strydom (2007) posits to the effect that this legal provision gives more power to the directors and at times it often disadvantages the unsuspecting shareholders of that particular company. Given such a scenario, it can be noted that some directors can take advantage of this unfavourable balance in the law which can result in losses being incurred by other people. In as far as fraud is not suspected in the demise of the company, the court can rule in favour of the director since he or she can be treated just like an individual person. The company is protected as ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/law/1391735-law-for-managers-lifting-the-corporate-veil
(Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1391735-law-for-managers-lifting-the-corporate-veil.
“Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1391735-law-for-managers-lifting-the-corporate-veil.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
ic
iciejenkins added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
This essay was always my weak point. I could never complete it well. Still, after I found this precise essay, I understood how it should be completed. So, I performed my research afterward and completed the essay in several hours, instead of weeks as it was previously.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil

Lifting the Corporate Veil

...?Lifting the Corporate Veil Introduction The extremely famous and somewhat revolutionary decision of Salomon v Salmon & Co Ltd [1897 introduced andupheld the corporate personality doctrine which was then defined in the Companies Act 1862. The effect of the decision was that creditors of a company that had gone insolvent would not be able to sue the shareholders of the company for its outstanding debts: the doctrine of separate corporate personality was effectively entrenched by the House of Lords. The decision brought several new effects to the company law world. Lord Herschell claimed that “the company is ex hypothesi a distinct legal person”2 and Lord McNaghten stressed that “the company is at law a different person altogether... will be...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Piercing the Corporate Veil

...an independent legal personality that protects its investors and shareholders. However, in some cases, the courts have not baulked at piercing the corporate veil, in order to expose the mala fide transactions of the company. As such, the courts are empowered to pierce the corporate veil, if corporate fraud has been perpetrated by its directors or managers. List of References Adams v Cape Industries plc (1990) Ch 433. Apthorpe v Peter Schoenhofen Brewing (1899) 15 TFR 245. Briggs v James Hardie & Co Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 549. Cheng, T. K., 2011. The Corporate Veil Doctrine Revisited: A Comparative Study...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Corporate Law Corporate Manslaughter

..., only companies as a whole to be fined, which when combined with existing law that only direct knowledge and malfeasance on the part of directors can lead to a prosecution means that only small businesses are likely to ever see imprisonments (Monbiot, 2005). “As directors can still be disqualified and imprisoned for a gross breach of their duty of care towards their shareholders' investments, money in the United Kingdom will remain more valuable than human life” (Monbiot, 2005). Worse, the standard for senior management being tried is grossly minimal: It must be proven that the senior manager “sought to cause the organisation to profit” for them to be criminally liable (Monbiot, 2005). When seeking to punish a corporation... does not...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Corporate law for managers

...? Corporate law for managers Institute The issue in respect of this question requires an analysis of the problems that wereassociated with the objects clause of a company in its memorandum of association and the resolution that was achieved by way of the Companies Act 2006. The problems in respect of objects clause in a company’s memorandum had been a problem for a considerable period of time and there were cases where the company changed its business and conducted certain acts in respect of such business which were held to be ultra vires (Introductions Ltd v National Provincial Bank Ltd). The courts had found that contracts which were subsequently ratified in a general meeting were not...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Lifting the Corporate Veil

...company in a group cannot be exercised by another company in that group”.15 Additionally, the House of Lords in its Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council [1978] decision disposed of Denning’s decision and held that the corporate veil should only be lifted if the group of companies is an obvious facade. However, Lord Denning’s decision was later reapplied by the Court of Appeal which declared that the corporate veil may be pierced or lifted “if it is necessary to achieve justice irrespective of the legal efficacy of the corporate structure under consideration”.16 This approach is arguably uncertain and consequently the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

Lifting the Veil- Prest V Petrodel

...?The paper seeks to critically analyse the Supreme Court’s decision in Prest (Appellant) v PETRODEL Resources and others (respondent) UKSC 34.The paper will then consider whether or not the judgment is consistent with the authorities (other cases) on lifting the veil of incorporation, or whether the court has set a new case authority by this decision. As such, the paper starts by outlining the meaning of corporate veil and this will be followed by a critical analysis of the case drawing examples from different case laws and statutes related to this topic. According to Cillers et al (2004), the association of persons or an organised body can acquire legal...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Abuse of Separate Entity lifting the corporate veil

..., death duty or stamp duty Where the controlling interest is in question in that the affairs of the company are being conducted with an absolute control over all the financial and other issues by the shareholders In the law relating to exchange controls, and in the law relating to trading with the enemy where the test of control is adopted (Palmer's Company Law; page 215, 24th Edn., 1987) Fraud: "A court may also pierce the corporate veil to prevent a fraud, where the corporation is found to be a "sham" meant to facilitate fraud against third parties." (Aaron Larson 2004) 3.0 Circumstances under Which Common Law Courts...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Lifting the Veil of Incorporation

..."Lifting the Veil of Incorporation" The doctrine of separate personality of a corporation engendered by the sheer act of incorporation is a well entrenched principle in English law. The doctrine simply states that once a company is formally incorporated in accordance with law, it starts to possess a personality of its own, one distinct from its members and stockholders. This distinct personality, by fiction of law, protects a corporation from the consequences of the individual acts of its members and stockholders. The principle had its beginnings in the Roman law and was officially adopted by English...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Corporate Law For Managers

...Corporate Law For Managers - Analyse the major problems surrounding pre-incorporation contracts and evaluate how far these problems have been resolved by the provision of section 36c of the Companies Act. 1985 as amended by the Companies Act. 2006. 1. Introduction The increase of business activities worldwide has led to the introduction of simpler procedures for the incorporation of businesses. However, quite often, the time spent on the completion of the relevant procedure can be longer than was initially estimated; in this case, the emergency for the development of an agreement before the incorporation of a particular firm may appear; this need is covered using the scheme of a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Outline and critically discuss the statutory and common law examples of 'lifting the veil' on corporate personality

...not in a position to bind the holding company to any of their activities. Therefore the holding company could not be said to have been present in the U.S. through subsidiary holdings.38 Conclusion The statutory and common law examples for lifting the corporate veil operate on the presumption that company management do not take advantage of the shield accorded separate legal personality. As has been demonstrated in this essay, where company owners and managers use the company as an instrument of fraud or for deliberately incurring debt and then subsequently escaping liability for that debt, the courts are willing to ignore the concept...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Law for Managers- Lifting the Corporate Veil for FREE!

Contact Us