Free

Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizend United and why What are the implications for political discourse in the U.S - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The Citizens United Ruling gave unions and corporations permission to spend unlimited sums of money on political tools to influence the election of a particular corporate candidate. The corporations and labor unions were allowed to spend as much as they wish in order to convince…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Courts decision in Citizend United and why What are the implications for political discourse in the U.S
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizend United and why What are the implications for political discourse in the U.S"

The Citizens United Ruling The Citizens United Ruling The Citizens United Ruling gave unions and corporations permissionto spend unlimited sums of money on political tools to influence the election of a particular corporate candidate. The corporations and labor unions were allowed to spend as much as they wish in order to convince people to vote a certain candidate. However, this decision seems not to have affected contributions. It is still not legal for labor unions and corporations to directly sponsor candidates for a federal political office. I do not agree with the Supreme Court decision for a number of reasons.
The financial support of a political post in a corporation is likely to influence corporate staff to engage in corrupt deals. One may not have enough resources to campaign for the seat, a factor that may influence them to engage in corruption to raise the required financial resources for the campaign. If the Court decision prohibited all forms of financial support for political candidates, candidates would learn to make their own personal efforts in campaigning and not rely on financial support from corporations (Abrams, 2011). This is an indication of able leadership by the political candidates who can sponsor their campaigns without external financial support at the same time; the decision encourages discrimination in contest for corporate political seats. It is not easy that all the candidates win a political support from a certain organization. For this reason, the ruling seems to encourage discrimination in corporate leadership.
Another reason that I disagree with the ruling is that it may interfere with transparency and accountability in elections. Some corporations may go as far as sponsoring election rigging to ensure that the preferred candidate wins the elections (Abrams, 2011). Election rigging may be one of the most serious problems in the economic and political development of corporations and nations when it is extended from the personal level to the corporate level. The decision was one of the most surprising decisions in the political sphere of the country, especially given the sensitivity on union and corporate money being used to sponsor federal elections (Neuborn, 2011). Despite the fact the funding of federal campaigns by corporations was banned; the law is not easy to implement if political campaigns in corporations are treated differently.
In my opinion, political campaigns need to be treated equally regardless of the level of the campaign, and the seat being contested. It is unfair to have financial sponsors for corporate campaigns and not the federal campaigns (Neuborn, 2011). If the Court allows corporations to support the campaigns of some political individuals in corporations, the same should apply to the federal campaigns. Nevertheless, financial support of election candidates promotes discrimination and inequality and should never be encouraged. It may influence the people to elect individuals who are preferred by corporations and not those who are preferred based on their manifesto and capability to perform (Hollis-Brusky, 2015). In conclusion, I do not agree with the Citizens United Ruling because it does not promote fairness and democracy in corporate elections. Money should not be used as a factor to lure voters into the candidacy of a certain individual.
References
Hollis-Brusky, (2015). Op-Ed: The Supreme Court’s Citizens United Decision Continues to Echo.
Abrams, F. (January 31, 2011). Debating Citizens United: Remember the First Amendment?
Neuborn, B. (January 31, 2011). Corporations Aren’t People. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizend Essay”, n.d.)
Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizend Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1684729-do-you-agree-or-disagree-with-the-supreme-courts-decision-in-citizend-united-and-why-what-are-the-implications-for-political-discourse-in-the-us
(Do You Agree or Disagree With the Supreme Court'S Decision in Citizend Essay)
Do You Agree or Disagree With the Supreme Court'S Decision in Citizend Essay. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1684729-do-you-agree-or-disagree-with-the-supreme-courts-decision-in-citizend-united-and-why-what-are-the-implications-for-political-discourse-in-the-us.
“Do You Agree or Disagree With the Supreme Court'S Decision in Citizend Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1684729-do-you-agree-or-disagree-with-the-supreme-courts-decision-in-citizend-united-and-why-what-are-the-implications-for-political-discourse-in-the-us.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizend United and why What are the implications for political discourse in the U.S

U.S. Supreme Court decision

...credits are private funds ? not government funds (Liptak, 2011). ACSTO, like many other programs in the U.S., gives state residents the ability to receive a tax credit for contributions to private organizations that provide private schools with scholarships. This ruling has wide-ranging effects across the governmental, political, and structural spheres of America. The ACSTO decision will greatly impact the way state governmental entities deal with programs similar to ACSTO across the country. Now that such programs will be recognized as legitimate, due to U.S. Supreme Court precedent, state institutions will no longer be able to easily keep state residents from freely...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

United States Supreme Court

...The United s' Supreme Court acts as a check for the legislative and executive branches of government as acts as the country's highest platform for not only judicial but also political resolution. Thus, it is natural that an appointment to become a Supreme Court justice is of public interest, if not concern. The interest in the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court by President Barrack Obama garnered more than its share of scrutiny. However, there are some opinion that the hesitation stems from Sotomayor's gender and race being a Latina. The attention was not just due to her...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

United States Supreme Court

...($39,000) is less than the debt’s amount. The question presented is whether a debtor can “strip down” the lien of the creditor on the real property pledged as collateral for the debt to the value of the collateral; more specifically, the United States Supreme Court was asked to determine the applicability of section 506(d) to this particular set of circumstances. For the reasons discussed below, the Court held that section 506(d) did not allow the debtor to “strip down” the lien. As an initial matter, the Court admits that section 506(d) is ambiguous, that both parties have made valid points, but that sound policy and harmonization of the modern Code...
2 Pages(500 words)Article

Supreme court ( political science)

...Explain the nature of the Supreme Court Article III of the United s Constitution provides that ‘The judi­cial Power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.’ In accordance with this provision and by authority of the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789 the Supreme Court was established (“A Brief Overview”, n.d.). The judiciary, legislative and executive branches form the three separate and independent branches of government. The Supreme Court’s responsibility includes resolving disputes by interpreting and applying the law. The...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

U. S. Constitution

...US Constitution s right in American political system refers to the political rights reserved for the governments. Even though America asa whole has a federal government, each state in America has separate state governments. US constitution provides some specific rights to the state governments in law making even though all the state governments are operating under the federal government. The rights of the state government are protected by the tenth amendments (Part of bill of rights) in US constitution. According to The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

The U>S Legal System

.... The admission of the stocking tops did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Therefore, he was not denied the due process of law. What was being done was just gathering evidence, and the authorities had the right to access his house. Task 3: General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence is applicable in this case. It provides that all evidence that is relevant is admissible, although with certain exceptions, and that irrelevant evidence is not admissible. That is why even after finding the stockings in his house, it was not sufficient evidence to incriminate the accused. Works Cited The People, Respondent, vs. Admiral Dewey Adamson, Appellant. No. 4622. Supreme Court of California. January 4, 1946. Print.... Legal Issue and a Strong and...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

U. S. Education Today & Tomorrow

...://www.techlearning.com/features/0039/no-limits/44886 Belfield, C., & Levin, H. (2002, January 1). Education privatisation: Causes, consequences and planning implication. unesco.org. Retrieved November 16, 2012, from unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133075e.pdf Bohlmark, A., & Lindahl, M. (2008, September 1). Does School Privatisation Improve Educational Achievement? Evidence from Swedens Voucher Reforms. iza.org. Retrieved November 16, 2012, from ftp.iza.org/dp3691.pdf Burbules, N., & Torres, A. (2000, January 1). Globalization and Education. College of Education Faculty | College of Education | U of I. Retrieved November 14,...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Supreme Court Winery Decision

...by the wine fabricating companies including chain stores, wholesalers and retailers (Bravin A1). The system reduced benefits since it boost unemployment in the United States. Although the decision might create new market niche for the country’s products, the benefits are enjoyed at the expense of collapse of local infant/inefficient industries. Question 2 Kantianism suggests that although some actions could bring about more happiness than the others could, there is a possibility of being prohibited. Based on this principle, the Supreme Court ruling was morally upright since it encouraged equality, transparency and fairness in the market. In fact, if all states and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court Decision

...of the Political Science of the Teacher 14 July Doe v. of Intrusia- Supreme Court Decision As per the wisdom and informed opinion of this Court of Law, the City of Intrusia no way violated the search and seizure protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment by intercepting the text messages of the accused Joe Doe, and these text messages are aptly admissible in this Court as valid and credible evidence. This Court has ample reasons to set aside the appeal made by the accused, Joe Doe. The Fourth Amendment in its word and spirit intends to protect “The right of the people to be secure”, in the condition that they are...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

U S History

..."Crisis of Confidence" in the United s The United s was a dominant world power in the 1970’s even though the countries self-perception was mired in doubt and malaise. The stagflation of the country’s economy, the experience and results of the Vietnam war, the lack of confidence of the government by the people as it was no longer perceived as a champion of freedom, the Watergate imbroglio all contributed to the “crises of confidence” in the country. The debt on the dependency of US citizens and the government increased resulting to difficult times. Jimmy Carter came into power at the time after the country’s failure in the Vietnam and Watergate scandals....
2 Pages(500 words)Admission/Application Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court's decision in Citizend United and why What are the implications for political discourse in the U.S for FREE!

Contact Us