Nobody downloaded yet

United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341; Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542 - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA), Defendant, Appellant, was argued from June 15 1998 and decided on December 10 1998. The defendant, SORTA, which is a state…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341; Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341; Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542"

Download file to see previous pages enged SORTA’s decision to reject the planned wrap-around advertisement, which they (SORTA) termed as aesthetically unpleasant and too controversial. Among SORTA’s commercial ventures is the sale of advertising space on the buses and bus shelters it owns. However, UFCWU’s proposed wrap-up advertisement, which portrayed protesting union workers fleeing from the police and boarding a bus belonging to SORTA was rejected. In its ruling, the district court concluded that UFCWU was favored by the balance of equities and, therefore, granted the preliminary injunctive relief (Moore 1).
Case number 07-2105, Rita Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Clinton County; Honorable Richard Saxton, Appellant, was argued from May 13 2008 and decided on October 1 2008. The civil rights action was brought against Richard Saxton, the Court of Common Pleas’ President Judge, by Clinton County’s former probation officer, Rita Miller. It was asserted by Rita Miller that Richard Saxton violated her right to free speech (First Amendment) and right to due process (Fourteenth Amendment) by firing her after she wrote him a complaint letter claiming hostility and intimidation from her supervisor. Miller appealed against Saxton’s decision to fire her, and a district court permitted the wrongful termination case to proceed. However, the case was dismissed by a federal appeals court, effectively reversing the ruling made by the district judge. Miller had alleged that her supervisor had acted unprofessionally by stating the probationers were a scum and did not merit the money spent on them by the probation office. In his move to dismiss the claims, Saxton wanted to be granted a summary judgment motion and alleged to be immune to suit.
In the UFCWU v. SORTA appeal case, the court stated that a preliminary injunction aims to avert irreparable injury and uphold a court’s capacity to deliver significant decisions based on merit in reference to Canal Authority of State of Florida v. Callaway, 489 F.2d ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Essay”, n.d.)
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1623007-united-food-commercial-workers-union-local-1099-v-southwest-ohio-regional-transit-authority-163-f3d-341-rita-miller-v-clinton-county-544-f3d-542
(United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 V. Southwest Ohio Essay)
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 V. Southwest Ohio Essay. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1623007-united-food-commercial-workers-union-local-1099-v-southwest-ohio-regional-transit-authority-163-f3d-341-rita-miller-v-clinton-county-544-f3d-542.
“United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 V. Southwest Ohio Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1623007-united-food-commercial-workers-union-local-1099-v-southwest-ohio-regional-transit-authority-163-f3d-341-rita-miller-v-clinton-county-544-f3d-542.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341; Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542

People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, (D.C. Cir. 2010)

...? Case Brief May 12, People’s Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United s Department of 613 F.3d 220, and (D.C. Cir. 2010). Parties People Moujahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), the petitioner in this case, is a political group in Iran while the Respondent was the United States Department of State. Facts Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the Security Council in the late 1990s authorized sanctions on certain terrorist organizations and entities. However, it left the modalities to its member states to operationalise national listing of individual organizations and persons and to implement the sanctions. In the...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

National Football League v. Primetime 24, 211 F.3d 10 WNET, Thirteen v. Aereo, Inc., 712 F.3d 676

... League vs. Primetime 24 appeal case, the court stated that, citing David [v. Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc., 697 F. Supp. [752] at 759 [(S.D.N.Y.1988)], the most logical interpretation to the Copyright Act is to maintain that a public performance or display engrosses “every phase in the procedure by which a sheltered effort progresses its ways to its audience” (Van Graafeiland et al 1). Citing WGN Continental Broadcasting Co. v. United Video, Inc., 693 F.2d 622, 624-25 (7th Cir.1982), the court also put into account whether a transitional carrier had openly performed patented telecasts by seizing program signals, modifying them and conveying them to cable television systems (Van Graafeiland et al 1). The court also established... not have...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Terry V Ohio case

... Terry V Ohio case 125 The Terry V Ohio case was brought to the United s Supreme Court in which they decided that unreasonable searches and seizures were not against the Fourth Amendment when this act was carried out by a police officer who felt it his responsibility to stop and check a suspicious individual: whether they have, will or had committed a crime. Terry V Ohio The Terry V Ohio case took place when a police officer stopped and checked three men because of their suspicious behavior. Occurring on October 31st 1963 when an experienced and old member of the Cleveland Police...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Mapp v. Ohio

...Mapp versus Ohio Introduction Mapp versus Ohio was the criminal case during which the United s Supreme Court put into law that evidence obtainedin violation of the Fourth Amendment may not be used in state or federal courts (Stephens, 2006). Therefore, the only evidence that would be deemed appropriate and therefore usable had to have been obtained while adhering to the Fourth Amendment. This also means that the search cannot be undergone without the proper permission of authorities; no public servant can force their way into a home without the appropriate search warrant (Hubbart, 2005). Background In 1957, it was believed by the Cleveland Police Department that Dollree...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Keeler v. Superior Court, 2 Cal 3D 619 (1970)

...on which Federal laws consider abortion, Keeler v. Superior Court launched new legislative efforts by which to support in utero rights. In the late 1970s, The American Convention on Human Rights spelled out what rights should be respected at the international level, as a means to gain support and public awareness. Article 4 from the charter states “every person has the right to have his life respected. This right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception” (cidh.org, 2010, p.2). Though the efforts of this convention did not have legal authority in the United States, it started a revolution in the criminal justice system to ensure fetus rights. The...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Terry v. Ohio

...Stop and an Arrest Stop and an Arrest In Terry v. Ohio, court laid down the rules in order to distinguish between a stop and an arrest. Even though there are confusions and issues, the following four factors lead to clear distinction between a stop and an arrest: Duration If the investigation is for a very short period of time, then it is considered to be a stop. A short duration would mean that the offices takes enough time to address basic questions such as name, personal details, address, personal identification proof, etc. If the investigation takes longer time than that is needed to address basic questions, then it is considered an arrest (Worrall & Hemmens, 2005). Purpose The purpose for the check...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

State v. Wong (1994), 95 Ohio App. 3d 39

...v. Wong (1994), 95 Ohio App. 3d 39 Citation The of Ohio, Appellee, v. WONG, Appellant. 97 Ohio App.3d 244, 646 N.E.2d 538 (Sept. 22, 1994.) Parties Carrie Wong, Appellant Harsha, Judge Mark Ochsenbein, Prosecuting Attorney Harry R. Reinhart for appellant Gary Gerson for Appellant Kenneth J. Fishman, for Appellant Leonard, F. Lee Bailey for Appellant Facts The Appelant had been accused and proven guilty of six counts of assault, after firing a series of shots to the police officers from Oak Hill police station, who had identified themselves as police officers before the Appellant fired shots at...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study

Mapp V. Ohio

...Mapp v. Ohio of the Law of the Concerned September 3, Mapp v. Ohio There is no denying the fact that Mapp v. Ohio tends to be a landmark Supreme Court case that influenced the inclusion and acceptance of evidence in the State Courts. On May 23, 1957, the Cleveland Police believing that Dollree Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, tried to search her home without soliciting a search warrant. To begin with, Mapp was able to resist the entry of the officers in her premises. However, later on the Police managed to force its way into Mapp’s premises, again without a valid search warrant. Though the police failed to find the bombing suspect,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Dinler v. City of New York, 607 F.3d. 923 (2d. Cir. 2010)

...petitioned and during the trials they requested for the production of undercover police reports. The court directed the city to produce the documents for verification by plaintiffs during the trial. Issues Presented/Question of Law: The plaintiffs alleged that the mass arrest of the demonstrators constituted the violation of their “state and federal constitutional rights” (United States District Court Southern District of New York, 2012, p.1). During the trial, they requested the production of police reports by covert operatives and the city filed writ for mandamus on the grounds that such documents cannot be divulged before the public. However, the district court ordered that the documents be produced and as an...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Wolf v. Colorado & Terry v. Ohio Case

...Wolf V. Colorado And Terry V. Ohio Case Wolf V. Colorado, 388 U.S. 25 When a court is faced with a case deemed as a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and State law through search and seizure by police of individuals,when deciding whether they crossed the federal constitutional line;the United States Supreme Court takes into consideration state search and seizure practices at the time of the Fourth Amendment’s enactment and current state practices.In this regard when interpreting the Fourth Amendment,the court in defining the scope of Federal protection both trusts and mistrusts modern state policing...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341; Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542 for FREE!

Contact Us