The Phenomenon of Anti/Post/De/Globalization - Essay Example

? How about Anti/Post/De/Globalisation? How about Anti/Post/De/Globalisation? In the current world, technology advances with each passing day. Many people are connected to technology and internet, in particular, is acting as a catalyst in the flow of information the world over. With the emergence of advanced technology, people do not need to travel long distances to get information. This has contributed to the ever changing world where people need new gargets that are faster, more reliable and efficient. People now have access to any information they need although legal issues come into play. This has also been enhanced by globalisation of media and mobility of information all over the world. The functionality of media has duly increased with the globalisation of their coverage. In recent times, informative functions are not restricted. As such, many people access data in any place. In actual sense, there are no boundaries when it comes to media coverage. The media does not have boundaries and it goes across all nations in spreading the information. This has eased access of information from nations, boundaries and territories across the globe (Legrain, 2006). This is called globalisation of media. The constraints that gag the media have been reduced and the informative functions have penetrated through the whole world. In this context, suppression of media across the globe no longer exists. The media expresses the information across the whole world without any constraints. This flow of information is global, which makes the whole media global. De-globalisation in the world has occurred from the structural economies of the world. Different countries have different methods that they use in ensuring media is concentrated in the economy (Wisler and Brodsky, 2011). However, the approach is different as they have other priorities. For instance there has been a great change in the countries that have a greater financial muscle than countries that are struggling in their economy. Their approach to media globalisation is well built and has enough resources. Therefore, their development is maintained at higher levels in countries that are enhanced economically. Theoretically, these countries use the economies of large scale production to appeal to the global world (Robinson, 2007). Since their investments are at high stakes, the welfare of such countries is enhanced. However, this leaves other countries that do not rely on economies of large scale in a quagmire. In many cases, they have to spend lots of accounts in ensuring the flow of information is maintained. This cripples their global standing as far as media is concerned. In such events, they do not sustain their long term driven activities in globalising the media. In such instances, they only assist the developed countries in achieving their goals. They are left on the lower side of globalising the media, which creates a drift between the globalisation in media. Introduction of global technology has played a major role in ensuring there is globalisation in media content. Technology has enhanced flow of information from one place to another in a short time. Therefore, people do not strain to get the information that is spread across the globe. For instance, technology is present in the whole world, ranging from sophisticated technology to simple technology. They are all involved in transforming information in the whole globe, depending on the prevalence of the data and how it interests people (Timothy and Janssen, 2011). With the improvement in technology in the whole globe, communicative standards have been improved. The media has been on the frontline in developing communicative means that are used across the whole world. This is a drill used by many media personalities to ensure information is spreading across the whole globe. People only need to have the advanced technology to access the information. Since restrictions are reduced, all people can access the information on their machines, gargets and handsets. Therefore, any person that has current and developed technology has the right to access this information, irrespective of the location, nation and place. This is a positive approach that has developed many industries across the world. Many people access information that triggers development across the world (Popescu and Costache 2006). For instance, when people access information on how the media is developing, they tend to use the same approach in fixing their situation. As such, they end up developing to a better shape. While globalising the media, some states are put on the line, especially when they do not have a choice of their own. Some countries are forced to rule out their economic liberalisation and track other countries in the development of media. Globalisation is an activity that needs all countries to participate in the development. However, when the rich countries are on top notch of the globalisation, they have to force other countries to achieve the same. Though the countries have a different in their economies, they still have to follow suit in achieving the global flow of information (Thomas, 2007). In such a situation, the rich countries are dictatorial. The other countries do not have control in some matters, which reduces their economic liberalisation. Therefore, they have to be dependent on other countries that make the rules in globalisation of media. This has adversely affected the development of countries that do not have structural and economic liberalisation as most of their decisions are not made from within (Fernandez, 2008). This has led to unified concentration of countries to support de-globalisation, which would increase their economic liberalisation. According to the Keynesian theory of capitalism, globalisation especially media globalisation is an advantage to rich countries. The rich countries amass benefits from the issue of media globalisation (Indrajit, 2002). Since they have a complex economy, they engage in various activities that enhance their economy. However, the other countries are constrained in their activities and have fewer options in achieving the optimal results in media globalisation. Just like in the economies of countries, media globalisation has been affected by traditional economic erosion. The media in developed countries achieves more than the media in the third world countries. Since it is a global activity, this happens in the whole world (Le Monde, 2011). Countries that do not have enough resources end up losing more. In making media globalisation fair, all the countries should gain. When some countries are gaining more than others, it makes the media globalisation unfair. Though the media is a global approach, there are various constrains that limit equality in the globalisation and spread of information. First of all, the media has not banked on the aspect of affordability in globalisation. It is evident that the whole world has many categories of people in different economic classes. There are some countries that are endowed with resources, which are also reflected in their media. The media that has resources is equipped to spread information across the nation and people that need it. For instance, they have the global power and equipment to spread information across the world at the least costs (GlobalResearch.ca, 2005-2012). These media houses have a point in communicating a larger audience due to their resources. On the other hand, some media houses do not have the financial muscle to develop sophisticated equipment. As such, they will not have the power to spread information across the globe. This information is not spread to a wider audience, which creates a difference between resourceful media and media that does not have resources. In such an instance, a media house that has resources has an advantage over other media houses that do not have substantial resources. This is an approach that discriminates the media houses that do not have resources. Therefore, the media houses that have resources will develop at a faster rate than media houses that do not have the financial muscle (Klein, 2000). In this aspect, the media houses that are strong and have a reputable financial muscle will continue to develop at a faster rate than others. As such, the media houses will never be equal. This is a situation where information flows from one fraternity, where others do not thrive (Held and McGrew, 2007). In the end, people will only access information from the media houses that are prevalent in the globe. The recipients of the global information in the world are varied and are all over the world. Therefore, when the globalisation was incepted, it was meant to assist all the people in the world access information (Schrire, 2000). According to the globalisation aspects, all people should access information at any time they need the information. In this line, the flow of information is available and varied, depending on the needs of the people. According to the economical theoretical view, the recipients of this information should spend to access the information. This includes having compatible technology and could at times pay for the subscription. Therefore, the information flow is only available to people that have substantial amount to spend on the information (Satoshi, 2011). In such a situation, the people that are financially stable will have advanced technology and garget to access this information. They will also have the muscle to retain such data and use it for future references. Since the economy spreads across the graph, people on the lower end of the graph do not have the financial muscle to purchase the technology. Therefore, they will not have compatible technology that receives these data. Similarly, they do not have the ability to save the data for future references (dotcom, 2012). Therefore, they are not positioned to access any flow of data. As such, media globalisation does not help the people that do not have the technology. The globalisation of media is suit for economies that are growing and is not available to the people that do not have the compatible technology. With such prevalent situations, the people that have the economic muscle will continue enjoying the fruits of globalised media while the constrained economy will be on the line. In conclusion, media globalisation should be an activity that is flawless. All the countries that are involved should achieve the same instead of enriching resourceful countries. All the stakes involved should be shared equally among member states to make it an achievement globally. Selective merits and gains achieved by few countries that are in control should be reduced. This should be geared towards enhancing the economic, communal and political structures in all the countries that are involved. References dotcom. (2012, August 2). Does anyone know what comes after globalisation? [Web log comment]. Retrieved November 27 2012, from http://www.trade2win.com/boards/economic-fundamental-analysis/158932-does-anyone-know-what-comes-after-globalisation.html Fernandez L. (2008). Policing dissent: Social control and the anti-globalisation movement. New York: Rutgers University Press. GlobalResearch.ca . (2005-2012). The globalisation of NATO: The roadmap to “post 9/11 madness” Retrieved November 27 2012, from http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-globalisation-of-nato-the-roadmap-to-post-911-madness/5304009 Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2007). Globalisation/anti-globalisation: Beyond the great divide. Cambridge: Polity. Indrajit, B. (2002). “The Locals strike back: Media globalisation and localization in the new Asian television landscaper,”International Communication Gazette, 64(6), pp.517 – 535 Klein, N. (2000). No logo. London: Flamingo. Le Monde. (2011, July 14). Absurd de-globalisation. The Liberator Magazine. Retrieved November 27 2012, from http://www.liberatormagazine.com/community/showthread.php?tid=1379 Legrain, P. (2006, September 10Th). Is the anti-globalisation movement wrong? (Part 1). Retrieved November 27 2012, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMmYreBTWFo Popescu, A., & Costache, S. (2006). Will the Anti-globalisation Movement Save Us from the Globalisation Demon? Romanian Economic and Business Review, 1(1), 33-38. Schrire, S. (2000). “The duality of globalisation: A view from the south,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 6(1). 49 – 66. Robinson, W. I. (2007). Theories of Globalisation. In G. Ritzer. The Blackwell companion to Globalisation. John Wiley & Sons. Satoshi, M, (2011).“Globalisation and citizens’ support for global capitalism: Multi-level analyses from the world-system perspective,” Journal of Developing Societies, 27(2), 119 – 151. Thomas, N. (2007). Global capitalism, the anti-globalisation movement and the Third World. Capital & Class, 31(92), 45-78. Timothy, J. D., & Janssen, S. (2011).“Globalisation and diversity of cultural fields: Comparative perspective on television, music and literature,” American Behavioural Scientist, 55(5), pp. 519 – 524. Wisler, S. & Brodsky, J. (2011, May 5Th). Antiglobalisation podcast. [YouTube Upload]. Duplin. Retrieved November 28Th 2012, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbvSUV4LZug Read More