Nobody downloaded yet

Campaign financing is protected under the First Amendment and is a form of free speech - Essay Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
Campaigns entail an exceedingly significant section of politics. This results from the idea that by using campaigns, authorities display change in their systems…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.8% of users find it useful
Campaign financing is protected under the First Amendment and is a form of free speech
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Campaign financing is protected under the First Amendment and is a form of free speech"

Download file to see previous pages The sources include bodies like companies in the possession of the state or those that are independently held. The event of funding campaigns comprises of variant views from scholars. There are people who support the actions whereas others refute this idea. Funding campaigns is an exceedingly freewill to corporations and entities (Hudson, 2011). This has explanations in the idea that corporations have contractual capacities. This explains that they can create agreements. This essay seeks to explore the arguments supporting financing of campaigns and oppositions of this argument. One reason why corporations can lend funds is that they have rights. This means that they entail rights similar to those of a person. Therefore, corporations can lend money to any persons that they please. For instance, funding money is an aspect of people. This depicts that a corporate can lawfully offer funds to campaigns. This explains that the corporate entail right to operate without intimidation from rule enforcers. Therefore, corporations possess possible capabilities to fund campaigns (Saad, 2010). Companies presume the position of people that own rights. This is firm reason for enabling corporations to finance campaigns. Apart from the idea that entities can fund other partnerships, they also entail the power to own wealth. This shows the truth aligned with acting of corporations. The first Amendment entails the facts that corporations can space for speech. One of the ways that it can express this freedom is concerning the way it handles decisions. The amendment offers that corporations can strategize their plans without counteractions. Therefore, companies have the power to execute their decisions without facing objections (Smith, 2007). This ensures that his or her actions have no one to outlaw. Bodies executing law ought to let companies perform their missions without interruption. The first amendment explains that companies entail the space to decide on their bill. This ensures that their funds have no second deciders. This is a result of the first amendment. Therefore, the corporations can act without feeling exploited by the authorities. This gives companies a leeway to decide on the places to invest their capital. Corporations depict the idea that their funds become exploited according to their decisions. The requirements of law ensure that everything corporations have contractual power (Kerch, 2003). Therefore, campaigns can source resources from corporations. The other reason for insisting on the financing of campaigns is the idea that they require the finances to function. This is explains that campaigns entail hefty capital that has to be solicited. These funds help many political bodies strategize their missions. This explains that the bodies entail to achieve what they perceive best for the entities. The other thing is that the entities have to ensure that they perform their decisions according to the provision in the amendment act. Campaigns necessitate finances so that they can be captivating moving in their actions. Another reason is the fact that corporations entail heavy capital. This explains reasons why campaigns solicit finances from them. This is because campaigns require heavy capital in executing their convincing. This is something entailing investing of high amounts of funds. Campaigns require sufficient finances that come from stable bodies like corporations. Small entities cannot avail ample resources to run campaigns. Therefore, ample funds emanate from able bodies like corporations. Therefore, companies have the power of deciding whether to help campaigners. This is a requirement of the act that companies follow their rightful decisions. The other fact is ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Campaign financing is protected under the First Amendment and is a Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1435861-campaign-financing-is-protected-under-the-first
(Campaign Financing Is Protected under the First Amendment and Is a Essay)
https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1435861-campaign-financing-is-protected-under-the-first.
“Campaign Financing Is Protected under the First Amendment and Is a Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1435861-campaign-financing-is-protected-under-the-first.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
wb
wbraun added comment 4 months ago
Student rated this paper as
Helpful paper! Used it to finish an assignment for a journalism & communication course. It was easy as ABC, for the first time in my life.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Campaign financing is protected under the First Amendment and is a form of free speech

First Amendment

...in to escort him out. Later a parent conference meeting was scheduled and he was awarded an hour detention for a week. Was Jacob’s right of freedom of expression under first amendment violated? Was the management decision justified? How can we draw a balance between rights and obligations under the garb of freedom of expression? One’s unpopular speech is other’s free speech. Is disciplining student a right reserved to college faculty? This essay tends to analyze these questions by comparing two essays from Stanley Fish and Stuart Taylor in order to seek a plausible role of first...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Free Speech

...and filters information make their own rules and block Internet access during political unrest. They justify that cutting off users from accessing the Internet is a means of protecting individuals’ status, counter terrorism and national security, yet in the real sense, they are violating the rights of individuals by restricting their access to the Internet. The Internet is a fundamental tool for enabling free speech and no bans should be imposed to it for prevention of accessibility. The use of Internet around the world has grown rapidly due to the market saturation and growth of industrialized countries, and a large percentage is using it for their daily activities (Danhof 69). The...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

First Amendment

...not enjoyed the same level of protection under defamation laws. For those in the “public eye” actual malice toward that person by the speaker must be demonstrated in order to prevail on a defamation claim. (Cohen, 2009). This is the reason we see so many celebrity tabloids with outrageous headlines in he checkout lanes in grocery stores. It’s much tougher for celebrities to win a lawsuit than the general public. Most forms of speech are covered by the First Amendment but besides defamation other types of speech may be legally restricted and civil litigation initiated based on these restrictions. The Supreme Court has set...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

First amendment

...to corporations and the protection was extended to cover free speech. With regard to ‘Austin’ again, the Court took the position that anti-distortion was a compelling government concern that justified a bar on self-governing election expenditures by firms and unions. As such, the Court passed a ruling that large collections of wealth, amassed with the aid of the corporate form, may eventually present adverse or damaging consequences, hence justifying a ban on corporate independent expenditures. On the other hand, The Citizens United Court argued that differential care of media companies and other firms cannot be settled with the First...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

Hate Speech and the First Amendment

...Lecturer: Hate Speech and the United s First Amendment Introduction The United s under the First Amendment provides that the legislature shall not enact any legislation that may prohibit free speech or reduce the freedom of speech, press, and the right to assemble, or the right to petition the government for a redress of complaints presented to it (Schultz 279). The freedoms thus provided under the First amendment protects the freedom of free speech for the common good of the citizens by...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

First Amendment

...and the content of the speech is commercial in nature. Commercial speech is accorded less protection by the first amendment. Content based regulation is only valid where it can withstand strict or intermediate scrutiny while false or misleading commercial speech is not entitled to any protection. The level of protection also depends on the forum used (OBrien & Collins, 2010). Conclusion The first amendment lays the foundation of the freedom of press and protects the citizens from unwarranted interference from the government. The Supreme Court is the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Types of speech within the First Amendment

...Types of speech within the first amendment Some types of speech get clearly protected within the first amendment coverage while others get entitled to less protection and get excluded altogether. The first amendment to the US constitution provides freedom of expression from government interference and thus provides the freedom of speech as its most basic element (Jones, 2011). Not all speech gets provided with equal protection under the first amendment. Some...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Censorship, The First Amendment, and Free Speech

...Should college campuses enforce hate speech s, thereby banning hate speech on campus? One of the amendments that are most valued under the U.S constitution is the first amendment that guarantees freedom of speech. Most people perceive this freedom as the one most vital and essentially distinguishing features of being an American. Restriction of freedom of speech is considered non-American. Adversaries of Hate speech codes claim that if government limits speech in any way, it will include speech, which is constitutionally protected (Gould...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Censorship, The First Amendment, and Free Speech

...English 105 Government internet restrictions The First Amendment gives the public the freedom of exercise, freedom of the press and freedom of speech. The amendment restricted the congress from making laws which hinder the establishment of religion or restrict the free exercise of citizen. However, there are several kinds of speech and internet contents which should be controlled and restricted by the government. Controlling the harmful and illegal content in the internet is not censorship since it protects the society from getting access to illegal content. It also ensures that spread of illegal content is...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

First Amendment: Free speech

...affiliations could only be assured by limiting the right to free speech. Even the Supreme Court in many cases that came before it has recognized the need to limit the right to free speech. For instance in Chaplinsky vs. New Hampshire, the Supreme Court restrained the use of such language and words that could lead to violence (Parker 85). In another case that is Miller vs. California, the Supreme Court extended a majority opinion that divested the obscene comments and language of the First Amendment protection (Parker 188). The verdicts in these and many other such cases amply justify the need to limit the...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Campaign financing is protected under the First Amendment and is a form of free speech for FREE!

Contact Us