The Advantages of the Microsofts Management Console - Assignment Example

MONITORING THE SURF SHOPPE SERVERS Institute: Monitoring the surf shoppe servers The Performance Monitor is a product of the Microsoft’s Management Console that offers the tools that enable in the analysis of the performance of the system. Performance in the computer is the measure of how fast an application and the tasks of the system are accomplished. It enables the monitoring of the application and the performance of the hardware on the single console at real time, the customization of the data you wish to assemble in logs, defining the actions that are automatic and thresholds that are used for alerts, generation of reports, and view the precedent data performance in various ways. It gives provision for the graphical interface that is used in the customizing of the Data Collector Sets and the Event Tracer Sessions. The Performance Monitoring tool is composed of three monitoring tools of the Windows Server, namely the System Monitor, the Performance Monitor, and the Advisor of the Server Performance. New features, however, have been incorporated: including the Data Collector Sets, the resource view, the diagnostic reporting, scheduling, and templates and wizards for the creation of logs (Hassell 2005). Performance Monitor Microsoft Management Console Snap-in consists of the following outlined elements: The Overview Screen which is also identified as Performance Icon. In central pane that contains the details, the overview screen is exhibited as home page, when the tool of monitoring performance is called upon. It depicts a graphical representation that is in real-time, for the usage of the CPU, network, memory, and disk for the system of the Windows Server 2008 R2. The Performance Monitor. The Windows Server 2008 R2 allows the monitoring of the performance and its reliability. It incorporated with two tools for the monitoring of the performance. The tools include: 1. The Performance Monitor- This is a tool that offers the analysis of performance and information, which is used for the analysis of troubleshooting and the monitoring of performance. The Performance Monitor exhibits the outputs of the performance counter in line graphs, bar chart and the report format. 2. The Reliability Monitor. The following are used in the monitoring of performance: 1. Objects- They are categorized in accordance to the functionality of the system or by alliance in the system. They can symbolize those entities that are logical in nature, for example, the memory. The amount of objects present in the system is based on the configuration of the system. 2. Counter- They are the object’s subsets. They give a more comprehensive information about an object, for instance the throughput or the length of the queue of an object. 3. Instances- In the case whereby the server consists of more than one object which are alike, each one of these objects is regarded as an instance. The Data Collector Sets- It assembles the data collectors to elements that can be reused with the diverse situations of performance monitoring. This enables the application of a single change of property to be applied to the whole set of the Data Collectors. The Report Generation- It provides reports that are friendly to the user. It enables one to quickly generate the reports and with the use of the Data Collector Set one can be able to generate reports of the data that has been collected. The process of monitoring performance should present a way of promptly evaluating the performances of the system at varied period of time to identify and possibly avoiding a disastrous occurrence before it leads to the downtime of the system (Morimoto 2004). The designing of a performance monitoring console which can be observed from a single screen is therefore possible by the performance monitoring tool which is a product of the Microsoft’s Management Console. The advantages of performance monitoring console design are: It merges the functionality of the tools that it offers into the single interface with the common techniques for definition of the data to be gathered. Data Collector Set enables a collection of counters to be portable. It provides reports that are friendly to the user. It enables one to quickly generate the reports and with the use of the Data Collector Set one can be able to generate reports of the data that has been collected. It enables the unified configuration of property for all the data gathering, as well as scheduling. If the Data Collector Set is going to be of use in the future for the monitoring of the performance, then one does not need create it again. It can be copied as a template. The Performance Logs and the Alerts features have been integrated into the Monitor of the Windows Performance are not restricted to a particular Sot of Data Collector. They can be used with any Set of Data Collector. The Windows Performance Monitor incorporates the templates of Data Collector Set that is default that enables one to begin the collection of the performance data instantly. The disadvantages of performance monitoring console design are: Instrumentation uses much of the CPU time of the server, as well as the space of the disk, which in turn compromises the performance being measured. These performance monitoring tools only supervises those platforms that make the internal instrumentation available. Instrumentation is not cost effective as licensing fee and the complexity of the configuration makes it expensive to acquire, install, and maintain. The Client Instrumentation consumes the resources of the desktop, and creates an extra traffic in the network every time clients account to the central console management. The application instrumentation produces data with a doubtful value that is to be used for troubleshooting and the monitoring of the performance (Troppens 2009). The Console Switches of the HP Server are the core components required to implement on the rack mount. A console signifies a single keyboard, a video monitor, and a mouse, otherwise known as the KVM joined to a single server. The Console Switches of the HP Server support numerous servers in a single rack that can be accessed as well as managed by a single keyboard, a monitor, and a mouse. With the use of the console switch, a capacity of up to 256 machines that are running in different operating system can be supervised. The Console Server Switches with 8 and 16-ports have an interface for the On-Screen Display. This feature has menus used to access each computer that has been attached to the server. The Console Switches of the HP Server can be attached in technique known as tiered for the purpose of increasing the access of the server from 8 or16 servers up to 256 servers. Switching from one computer to another is enabled by typing a command used for switching. Alternatively, one can use the mouse so as to work together with graphical interface of the desired computer through the OSD. Both the 8 and the 16 port versions of the console switch support a dual support for the console which allows for the flexibility in controlling the configurations of the switch by multiple users or from multiple locations. The Windows Server 2008 R2 is a server that enables the monitoring through a single screen. This is made possible by the screen of the performance monitor. It illustrates diagrammatically the usage of the disk, memory, network, and the CPU of the server. This server provides a server platform that is cost-effective and also productive, as well as a virtualization that is low in terms of cost. It also has the capability of saving power, provides an experience that is of a better-quality for the end users. When using Service Pack one, HP supports The Windows Server 2008. This server can sustain a capacity of up to 64 processors (Russel & Crawford 2011). The following is an example of a screenshoot of a single-screen console: Cloud infrastructure can either be public or private. In the case of the private cloud infrastructure, the customer is the one who owns and manages the infrastructure and it is situated in the region where the customer performs the actual control from. In order to access data under this infrastructure, one needs permission from the customer. In the case of the public cloud infrastructure, the provider of the cloud service is the one who owns the infrastructure and it is located at the region where the provider of the cloud service performs the actual control from. MegaCorp is Storage Area Network that has its data stored in the cloud. This is made possible by the provider of the cloud storage. In order to utilize the service, MegaCorp installs machines that are dedicated within those areas covered by its network. These machines run a variety of components that are core in accordance to a specific situation. These key components utilize the secret master key. For these reasons, they need to be guarded sufficiently, more so the secret master key. The secret master key is supposed to remain undisclosed even from the provider of the cloud storage service. In order to cut on the amount of cost incurred during this exercise in terms of the resources required, the dedicated machines management can be contracted from a trusted external entity. For those enterprises that are of the medium size with the required know-how and resources, dedicated machines are comprised of a token and credential generator, data processor, and data verifier. A credential generator is used to provide credentials for the MegaCorp and the employee. These credentials consist of important information about a particular employee, for instance, the organization the employee is working for and his/her role in the organization. Each time an employee of the MegaCorp creates a data that is required to be stored up in cloud, there is a decryption strategy that is needed to be send alongside the data created to be processed by the particular dedicated machine. The decryption strategy is used to identify the appropriate credentials for decrypting the data (Poelker & Nikitin 2009). References Hassell, J. (2005). Using Microsoft Windows Small business server 2003. Berkeley, CA: Apress. Morimoto, R. (2004). Microsoft Windows Server 2003 insider solutions. Indianapolis, Ind: Sams. Poelker, C., & Nikitin, A. (2009). Storage area networks for dummies. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley. Russel, C., & Crawford, S. (2011). Windows Small Business Server 2011: Administrators companion. Sebastopol, Calif: Published with the authorization of Microcoft Corp. by OReilly Media. Troppens, U. (2009). Storage networks explained: Basics and application of Fibre Channel SAN, NAS, iSCSI, InfiniBand and FCoE. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K: Wiley. Read More