The Impacts of Internet on Information Literacy and Library Skills - Annotated Bibliography Example

The Impacts of Internet on Information Literacy and Library Skills Annotated Bibliography Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54 (4), 1222-1232. The authors explain that for the last fifteen years, the use of internet technologies including web has highly increased in postsecondary education especially in colleges and institutions of higher learning. The National Survey of Students Engagement developed set of items which were used by the researchers making use of the hierarchical linear model and multiple regressions in their research.

The researchers investigated how Web-based technology had impacts on the engagement of students. The researchers compared the outcomes of self-reported learning in face to face and the environments of the online learning. The authors also explain that online learning enables the students to meet their lecturers online acquiring for more information concerning their courses. Many students are able to pursue their courses even when they are away from the institution. The students do not really have to attend face to face lectures.

This was seen in high enrollment in online courses. I found the source useful because it informed me that one can pursue courses online and receive useful information concerning the course. Chua, A. Y., & Goh, D. H. (2010). A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 203-211. Web sources represent a suitable application that holds immense potential in enriching the communication; enabling collaboration and fostering innovation through the use of information research tools from web such Wikipedia.

But until now little work has been done to research web applications in library websites to seek for information. The extent of web application prevalent in the library affects the information acquisition because the seeking of information becomes reliable. Web applications such as Wikipedia have been used in the library in various ways which include but not limited to research and searching of particular information. Other sources include: Chua, A. Y., & Goh, D. H. (2010). A study of Web 2.

0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 203-211. Corbin, J., & Karasmanis, S. (2010). Evidence into practice: Evaluation of an innovative information literacy model for first year Health Sciences students. In First Year in Higher Education Conference, Adelaide. Correia, A. M. R., & Teixeira, J. C. (2003). Information literacy: an integrated concept for a safer Internet. Online Information Review, 27 (5), 311-320. Kern, R., Ware, P. A. I. G. E., & Warschauer, M. A. R. K. (2008).

Network-based language teaching. Encyclopedia of language and education,, 4, 281-292. Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2000). Student cheating and plagiarism in the Internet era: A wake-up call. Libraries Unltd Incorporated. Maness, J. M. (2006). Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology, 3 (2), 2006. Postman, N. (2000). The humanism of media ecology. In Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association (Vol. 1, pp. 10-16). Probert, E. (2009). Information literacy skills: Teacher understandings and practice.

Computers & Education, 53(1), 24-33. Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374-385. Tausczik, Y., Faasse, K., Pennebaker, J. W., & Petrie, K. J. (2012). Public anxiety and information seeking following the H1N1 outbreak: Blogs, newspaper articles, and Wikipedia visits. Health Communication, 27(2), 179-185. Thompson, C. (2003). How college students use the web for research. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3 (2), 259-268.

References Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54 (4), 1222-1232. Chua, A. Y., & Goh, D. H. (2010). A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 203-211. Corbin, J., & Karasmanis, S. (2010). Evidence into practice: Evaluation of an innovative information literacy model for first year Health Sciences students.

In First Year in Higher Education Conference, Adelaide. Correia, A. M. R., & Teixeira, J. C. (2003). Information literacy: an integrated concept for a safer Internet. Online Information Review, 27 (5), 311-320. Kern, R., Ware, P. A. I. G. E., & Warschauer, M. A. R. K. (2008). Network-based language teaching. Encyclopedia of language and education,, 4, 281-292. Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2000). Student cheating and plagiarism in the Internet era: A wake-up call. Libraries Unltd Incorporated. Maness, J. M. (2006).

Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology, 3 (2), 2006. Postman, N. (2000). The humanism of media ecology. In Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association (Vol. 1, pp. 10-16). Probert, E. (2009). Information literacy skills: Teacher understandings and practice. Computers & Education, 53(1), 24-33. Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374-385. Tausczik, Y., Faasse, K., Pennebaker, J. W., & Petrie, K. J. (2012).

Public anxiety and information seeking following the H1N1 outbreak: Blogs, newspaper articles, and Wikipedia visits. Health Communication, 27(2), 179-185. Thompson, C. (2003). How college students use the web for research. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3 (2), 259-268.