Some Perspectives of Managerial Ethical Leadership - Essay Example

LEADERSHIP QUALITIES Quiz The quality traits of managers have been discussed comprehensively particularly the integrity, job know how and people and building of people’s skills. Ethical charismatic describes integrity in management as a sphere where honesty and an action of a given individual person is reflected depending on the values and the benefits that are brought forth as a result of the leadership. In most of the institutions in the world nowadays integrity of an individual having interest in a given position must be tested and evaluated. On the same note truthfulness and uprightness of a manager is seen in the way she or he operates (Scott, 2002).Therefore, integrity encompasses a wide scoop. In the managerial position, it entails adherence to the laws and regulations though the most complexity issue is to influence the followers to work. The bone of contention only emerges when a serious situation arises that requires critical and cognitive resolution where a leader is solely responsible for the ultimate outcome of the decision made. However, leaders are mandated to give a clear instructions to the people he or she leads. In other words virtues developed inwardly shall direct their decisions. Despite all the qualities of ethical leadership, there are many challenges hindering their effort to provide sufficiently to the followers, non-existent of ethics to the followers thus call for a rapid move that might compromise their integrity. In management, truthfulness and quality leadership can only be realised when the economy is stable. Otherwise weak economy undermines the virtues. Shadow powers, deception, and irresponsibility and misplaced aggression and loyalties influence the possibility of effective performances, since the forces antagonist with the managerial forces. Therefore, effective manager is one who is very dynamic and consider all the employees interest, nurture their talents band above all train them for future productivity of the business. In the case study done in the main institutions in the world, empirically analysis suggest that when a leader exposes the employees to promotion and training they will get motivated and work smartly to face the emerging issues(Lewis, 1994). In regard to the technicalities of the job, the manager should be all rounded. Ethical ecology suggests that he or she should interact with all the departments within the organisation just as the various parts of the living organism parts relates. Moral landscape should influence their decision making. However, the landscape entails considering all the code of conducts that affluence the business entity (Scott, 2002). The management corporate policy, financial affairs, human resources including movables and organisation visions must be well known by the team leader. The challenge that is usually facing the quality is the unwillingness of the departments and uncertainties that escalate the whole scenario. The stalemate mentioned can be addressed by building a strong communication network and incorporating all the theories of leadership in management and develop strong platform where issues affecting the business is coherently addressed. Ethical failure might result when the manager is ignorance. In a case where he or she feels that leadership and one are inseparable entities. They thought is claimable and would make the leader excusable of the moral in the process of duty execution. Question2: Transformational leadership and the leader’s leader. The revolution leadership refers to those activities taken by an organisation to acquire, develop and maintain the resources available for the future. Therefore, in a real situation, the conversion made by the ethical management is that the followers are indemnified by the virtues demonstrated by their leader. In contrast, there are several paradigms in the approach to generate a change to the entire leadership in terms of the management. Altruistic motivation appraise that a manager should have a self-drive motive towards any action beneath the decision made. Another paradigm in the contest is egoistic that is based on doing the right because that is what leaders stands for. In the approach laid by Communitarian, leadership advocates for a system of management, that is, a practise in the society that leads to the improvement of the societal lives at large and lastly being autonomous to the followers (Harari, 2002). However, ethical theories that have been underlined have significantly determined how the whole process revolts are; Classical leadership theory that base is its regression on the transformation leadership in its abatement raises the level of human behaviour and the moral inspiration of the followers. The followers are incited by the way the manager performs the managerial role. The philosophical argument put forth, was that inspirational leader without loss of generalisation the converse hold to the followers. The spirit of such managers would change their thinking as well as reasoning capabilities. In that respect people would prefer to form association with ethical personnel and tend to imitate their character traits. The change expected in the management to revolutionise the contemporary world is a unique characteristic that is being a servant to the people through ensuring that their ethical development is given priority rather than that of the managers themselves. Leadership is a very complex entity in management and growth of any business or an organization. Good leadership is only measured by the results produced. For an organization to thrive or yield results, then the drive and motivation should come from the leader. The leader should be an inspirational tool for others around them. The leader should have the ability to inspire others to do well. The inspiration can be articulated in the form of acknowledging good results from the employees and recommending them for it. A good leader is also able to correct their employees in case of a mistake that can occur when handling a particular task .Good leadership comes in when the leader volunteers by showing the employees what is expected in a polite manner (Scott,2002). Employee motivation level is also increased when the leader has very high expectations. The high expectation level of a leader can only be seen when the leader shows signs of optimism even when the company is at the brink of collapse. The leader should also have good attitudes that inspire others around them to work. Negativity and cruelty towards the employees creates poor relations within the organization hence prudent employees will shoulder on at work. Organizations and leaders that realize success have a vision. The vision that the leader set up must be goals and objectives oriented. During my leadership in the organization, the vision of the organization was well written and given to all the employees in print form. This gave them the chance to remind themselves of the things that we intended to achieve (Scott, 2002).Occasional meeting were also held to review performance of what we had achieved and what is yet to be accomplished .The success of a business also involves constants training and coaching of the employees to keep up with the changing requirements in the business world. The training may be on the new trends of in the market or even the new ways of working .A major should not be driven by the fear of training and losing the employees but should rejoice of the fact that they have positive influence on others. Decision making is another key factor towards productivity of an organization. Decision making activities that influence success are always timely. Late decision making can mean loss of a chance to produce result likewise prompt decisions are likely to make adverse results and progress in an organization .A good manager should make a decision at the right time since almost everyone within the organization Looks up to him or her .Good managers and leaders do not procrastinate or avoid complex issues (Scott, 2002). Results realization within an organization depends on the influence of the leader to others around him or her. The leadership influence is both necessary within and outside the company .A leader is only able to have a good energy and influence of the people around him or her depending on the relationship with others. Good interpersonal and communication skills influence how the others will relate to the leader. Good communication skill will draw close more clients and investors to the company. Poor relations drive away investors and clients. Rost (1991) contend that influence is the frequently used word in leadership books in 1940s through the 1980s. Unity within the organization is also another success factor. A good leader strives to unite all employees so that they are capable to recognize themselves as a single object. The employees must seem themselves a system that if one part fails the others are also bound to fail. Leadership is as a result of normal processes associated with group membership. The more the employees view themselves as an entity the more productive they will be. (Hogg 1991). QUIZ 3 On the leadership- the readings, the article clearly illustrates what contributes to effective leadership. The work of leadership in an organisation is looked at in broader terms, not just by the duties but by the functionalities. Other than making decision, leaders are in the fore front in determining the productivity of the firm (Scott,2002).Decision making is defined as the process of stipulating the nature of a specific problem and choosing among accessible substitutes in order to solve the problem. It is the process of choosing between the alternatives. Therefore in decision making the problem precedes any decision and there must be a number of alternatives courses of action in the attainment of the actual course selected (Scott, 2002). The prime function of any leadership an organisation and at management level is the determinant of the allocation of the scarce resources available in the organisation. Leadership also entails deployment and appointment of the new staff members and inducing them into the tasks required of them. Quiz 4 The management has developed and would want things done in the great way and the desire of a leader is that the things are done the best way possible. Therefore work should be looked into logically by the leaders by a wider thought. It is therefore necessary to define work and relate it to the functionality of management. In the understanding of the meaning of work people view it differently. Usually it is normally perceived as an activity that produces something of great value. The mentioned definition of work indicates that work must generate productive end both to the worker and the organisation. For this to be realised, management must ensure that effective working force is put into place. In the paradigm, a manager is that individual responsible for the attainment of the goals and the objectives of an organisation. Moreover, the key role of the management has been abated in a classical manner by the experiments approach. The research conducted on leadership connectedness to behaviour of individual indicates that the individual tend to behave as their leaders and it is through this contest that the argument has been based (Scott, 2002). The coaching of the followers would rather ensure self-efficiency of the intents and in the actualisation of the quality feedback by the end of the day. There the leadership contest raises very good question on the management, “should anyone be led by you”? The question can only be answered only and only if the management theories have been analysed and all the ethical issues surrounding leadership. In the context, having examined the capacities of leaders, it is obvious without generalisation that leaders are born and not made (Scott, 2002). However, the made leaders a times come out obsessive and name building oriented. The philosophical reasoning as to whether work should be professional humility or professional will has raised several concerns. In the quantitative and qualitative analysis done by scholars in the world suggests that professionalism does it all. This is because training must be done to enable one to undertake a given task. In the same sphere, being humble on the tasks makes it to contain much water. So, utilitarian approach substantiates the qualities of a manager with regard to humility and professionalism as the core links in the management. Democratic theory on leadership ascertains the principle of participation as mandatory in the decision making and in the operation of the business. However, free will is arbitrarily stagnates the primary role of a management platform and it give no regulation and powers to the managers. The best quality that leaders needs to uphold includes empathy where the manager put other people feelings first, that is. Attracting and retaining the follower’s talents. A manager should bear considerate traits in the deliberation of duties. Motivation, self-awareness and regulation, Trustworthiness and self-confidence are the primary qualities that a vibrant individual need to have to lead and not to be led. Therefore, leading put an individual in an apex of sole decision making that is very interesting and challenging. The author of the blue hand book main central lesson is that superb leaders bear similar characteristics, intelligence and effective performance at work as far as management is concerned. However, the essay provides a clear benchmark for professional leaders. The essay put to a higher degree the threshold capabilities in management. In the book, traditional thoughts associated with leadership, for example toughness, determination and vision required in personnel have been termed as subdued. It reiterated that the notion of success is measurable for all sorts of achievements. Moreover, it is formidable to check on the social aspect, since living human beings cannot operate in isolation and it is within their sphere that management is built. The argument is that a person may have the best training in the world, an incisive, and have analytical mind thought does not make a great leader. Emotional intelligence has been their major point of concern in the organisation, evaluating its effects and significance by use of competency models (Scott,2002).The author made comparison in regards to competency and effectiveness level and the deduction was that the higher the rank the greater the competency. Effectiveness in the institutions is bound to get to the top when reconciliatory approach is administered by the uppermost organ in the business. In management pursuit alienation in terms of race and classes might affect negatively. In summary, the essay is very relevant in the upbringing and trait development, through nurturing of future leadership. It paradoxically recognized that there are some traits that are not in built though are acquired by training and exposure to different ecological conditions. The fundamental consideration is the success of the organisation by quality service delivery. Therefore in an attempt to change the reasoning ability on individual perception on management, common historical approaches, i.e. utilitarianism, libertarianism which advocates for the freedom of the employees in the workplace and Kant’s ethical theory that gives leadership the benefits of doubt i.e. Do the right thing regardless of the consequences. In the comparative studies policy and sustainability are fostered when executives are constrained and reforms policies are negotiated to enhance quality products. In a nut shell, great leaders are few as they have unique character traits that differs from the other” normal leaders” and their emotional intelligent plays a vital role in the mid to an organisation prosperity Work cited Lewis, Clark. (1994). The abolition of man, New York: Happers Collins. Enderle, Glauchy. (1987). Some perspectives of managerial ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(8), 657-663. Frank, R. Scott. (2002). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1/2), 81. Read More