Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Proctor Hospital was a famous case that depicted the strict application of employment laws after the complainant, an employee, claimed that due to his service in the military the employer had discriminated him. According to his allegation, this was against the…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case"

Employment Discrimination Case November 3, The Discrimination Case The Staub v. Proctor Hospital was a famous case that depicted the strict application of employment laws after the complainant, an employee, claimed that due to his service in the military the employer had discriminated him. According to his allegation, this was against the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. After the termination of his contract, the judges wanted to establish whether it could be a case of discrimination and hence a violation of the Act.
The evidence that was produced supported the case as it was clear that the complainant’s supervisor at the army reserves was normally harsh to him. They had both commented negatively towards him and it was evident that they were out to terminate his job and contract. Staub had earlier been made to check with his employer any time he left the job premises after false allegation that he had left the place of work. After some months, one of the supervisors maliciously reported Staub to the vice president for leaving the work area. This was followed by a discontinuation from his work by the vice president.
The evidence given made the jury to rule in the favor of the complainant but some time later the federal court reversed the ruling. In the ruling, the judges claimed that the decision made by the vice president was not solely dependent on the information given by the supervisors. This therefore ruled him out of the discrimination case. Therefore, the Court of Appeal concluded that the company was not liable. This ruling was overturned by the Supreme Court on the basis that the employer remains liable if the decision made is motivated by a discrimination bias. According to Guerin (2011), this ruling was therefore in favor of Staub and that served as a great motivation to employees going through the same. This Act is therefore important in safeguarding the rights of employees against discriminatory supervisors.
Guerin, L. (2011). Supreme Court victory for employees in discrimination case. Nolo’s Employment Law Blog. Retrieved from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case Essay - 1”, n.d.)
Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case Essay - 1. Retrieved from
(Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case Essay - 1)
Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case Essay - 1.
“Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case Essay - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case

Employment Law case

...?Employment Law Case Jill must prove that she is an employee, rather than a mere independent contractor of Momma Mia. This is important because the determination will decide if the relationship between her and the company is governed by contract or the employment laws of the US. If Jill is classified as independent contractor, any dispute between her and Momma Mia will be determined by contract laws, but if she that she is an employee of Mommy Mia, she will be able to contest the termination in accordance to prevailing employment laws. Momma Mia will then be subjected to wrongful termination charges. In...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study


... [Manager] EMPLOYMENT LAW 24 November EMPLOYMENT LAW Jami is clearly a victim of sexual harassment. According to lawyer Mary L. Boland, “sexual harassment is a kind of sex discrimination involving unwelcome sexual conduct or pressure in school or the workplace. Equal treatment in school and in the workplace is a civil right under federal and state laws”. In this given problem, the sexual advances made by Jami’s boss constitute sexual conduct in the work environment. The traumatic ordeal she had to go through forced her to seek medical and psychiatric treatment to overcome the sexual abuses she had experienced in the hands of her employer. In the case of Smith V. First Union National Bank (202, F. 3d 234,242, 4th Cir. 2000), sexual... ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Employment Law

... Employment Law Workers and their families have rights especial upon the termination of their employment for the continuity of their health benefits, which are supposed to be acquired through health plan progress. However, employers are required to provide termination notices just in time and under consolidated budget-reconciling act known as CORA and health insurance portability and accountability Act (HIPAA). In the United states of America equal employment opportunity laws are meant to deny discrimination norm in employment environment based on the race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, disability status as well as national origin. Taking into consideration the situation of Kayte Clark, we realize that she has worked... any union...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Employment Law: employment discrimination

.... In the case of Fearon v Chief Constable of Derbyshire [2004], acts of the employer that denies the employee access to such opportunities was considered as an unlawful discrimination.3 Aside from this, Anne was also denied the right to meet her accusers, know the entire details of the complaints against her, defend herself fully against such alleged complaints, be accompanied by a person who can fully represent her cause, and given a fair and impartial determination of the issues as warranted by the general principles of natural justice and fair play. All these, according to the Code of Practice Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures is a clear violation of an employee's rights. 4 ...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Employment Law Case Study

...Liability As stated above, Vicarious liability is an old principle of employment law whereby the employer is held to be responsible for the acts of its employees when they are acting within the course and scope of their employment. The vicarious liability of the employer can be traced to the definition of employer-employee relationship propounded by the U.S.Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Silk (1) 91 L.Ed. 1757: 331 U.S. 304 (319), per Reed, J. wherein it was agreed that the test was whether the men were employees " as a matter of economic reality". The important factors were said to be "the degrees of...
11 Pages(2750 words)Case Study

Employment Law--Case Report Part2

...of employment, and can only be one date, but in discrimination cases where the allegations often span a lengthy period the position is much more complex. The law provides in each of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, Race Relations Act 1976 and Disability Discrimination Act 1995 that an act which extends over a period of time is treated as being done at the end of that period. So whether something can be described as a continuing act is often determinative of whether the claim has been brought within the three month period. It was exactly this point that the Court of Appeal has considered in the landmark case of...
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study

Employment Law: case study 2

...For qualifying for unfair dismissal protection the employee must have worked as a full time or part time employee for a period of at least one year continuously and the employee's job should have ended less than 3 months ago. Under the existing law the employee has to bring a claim for unfair dismissal within three months of the termination of his employment. The requirement of one year continuous service is being waived in certain cases like where the dismissal is linked with pregnancy and maternity rights or dismissal relating to working time regulations. An employee can be dismissed by the on the grounds of lack of qualifications, incompetence and health reasons. In addition the...
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study

Employment Law

... Employment Law Sexual Harassment laws are applicable in this case, considering that Jami Jensen was exposed to unfair treatment in the work place, due to resistance of sexual advances that were made to her by John Clark, the Vice president of the company. Sexual harassment requires that various thresholds are met, to have sufficient prove that it was actually sexual harassment, and that the employer is liable for the offense. The other law that is applicable in this case is the contract law, which provides for the basis of a contact between the employee and the employer, and further covers the basis for hiring and dismissal of the employee, by the employer. Starting with the application of the contract law, it is apparent... that the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Gender Bias and Employment Discrimination Law

...Gender Bias and Employment Discrimination Law In the real world setting, normally a majority of what we can do is recognise differences in outcome. A male is selected for hire over a female; fewer females reach tenure track positions as there is a huge gap in publications (Krieger, 2004). Bias might be suspected in a majority of cases, but the challenge in using outcomes to confirm it is that the differences might be because of a number of potential factors (Krieger, 2004). We can conjecture that maybe women are less concerned in these fields. Maybe women have a lifestyle, which lead them away from various roles that are considered manly. In a real world setting, when...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Employment Law fire him. So that’s why Michael is ready to file a law suit against the decision of the John. If Michael files a law suit against the company then this legal battle can severely damage the hard earned reputation of the company. On the other hand we may end up employing Michael again as he has been a good employee of the company and there is no evidence to support his termination. This case is similar to the United States of America’s Supreme Court Case Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989) case. This case is based on gender discrimination issue. In this case Ann Hopkins was barred from the partnership...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Case Study - Employment Law - Employment Discrimination Case for FREE!

Contact Us