Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) - Admission/Application Essay Example

Case Study: Harris v. Jones [Coarse Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 In this case, the defendant was the supervisor of the plaintiff at the factory. The defendant was well aware of the fact that the plaintiff had a speech disorder that caused him to stumble. Due to this purpose, the defendant ridiculed the plaintiff in order to cause anguish. Because of this anguish, the plaintiff filed a case against the defendant for intentional infliction of emotional distress (Media Law Resource Centre, 2014).

Facts: The defendant who was the supervisor of the plaintiff at an automobile company used to mimic him during work. The plaintiff asked him so many times to stop this habit of him, but he rebuffed the plaintiff. At last, the plaintiff sued him, but he also affirmed that the defendant was not the only one who misbehaved with him, and he also had similar issues with other supervisors. The court made a decision in favor of the plaintiff, but afterwards, the Court of Special Appeals overruled the decision.

Issue: The issue was that the plaintiff suffered distressed which was considered as ‘Severe’.Holding: After considering all facts and figures the Court of Special Appeals reversed the previous decision that was in favor of the plaintiff.Rationale: The court made the decision after allowing a discussion of the whole situation that the plaintiff was facing in order to know whether the distress was severe. On the basis of the entire situation and circumstances, it was evident that the distress was severe because the plaintiff had a lot of problems in his workplace that made it very difficult to work.

Rule of Law: In the future, any court decision that has to be made in regards to the assessment cases involving the intentional infliction of mental distress, it is a must to consider that distress has these four elements such as intended or irresponsible conduct, outrageous and extreme conduct, a spontaneous connection in between the distress and the conduct, and the distress that can be considered as severe.ReferenceMedia Law Resource Centre. (2014). Media Privacy & Realted law 2013-14. New York: Media Law Resourc centre, Inc.