Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) - Admission/Application Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The defendant was well aware of the fact that the plaintiff had a speech disorder that caused him to stumble. Due to this purpose, the defendant ridiculed the plaintiff in order to cause anguish…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful
Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977)"

Case Study: Harris v. Jones [Coarse Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 In this case, the defendant was the supervisor of the plaintiff at the factory. The defendant was well aware of the fact that the plaintiff had a speech disorder that caused him to stumble. Due to this purpose, the defendant ridiculed the plaintiff in order to cause anguish. Because of this anguish, the plaintiff filed a case against the defendant for intentional infliction of emotional distress (Media Law Resource Centre, 2014).
Facts: The defendant who was the supervisor of the plaintiff at an automobile company used to mimic him during work. The plaintiff asked him so many times to stop this habit of him, but he rebuffed the plaintiff. At last, the plaintiff sued him, but he also affirmed that the defendant was not the only one who misbehaved with him, and he also had similar issues with other supervisors. The court made a decision in favor of the plaintiff, but afterwards, the Court of Special Appeals overruled the decision.
Issue: The issue was that the plaintiff suffered distressed which was considered as ‘Severe’.
Holding: After considering all facts and figures the Court of Special Appeals reversed the previous decision that was in favor of the plaintiff.
Rationale: The court made the decision after allowing a discussion of the whole situation that the plaintiff was facing in order to know whether the distress was severe. On the basis of the entire situation and circumstances, it was evident that the distress was severe because the plaintiff had a lot of problems in his workplace that made it very difficult to work.
Rule of Law:
In the future, any court decision that has to be made in regards to the assessment cases involving the intentional infliction of mental distress, it is a must to consider that distress has these four elements such as intended or irresponsible conduct, outrageous and extreme conduct, a spontaneous connection in between the distress and the conduct, and the distress that can be considered as severe.
Media Law Resource Centre. (2014). Media Privacy & Realted law 2013-14. New York: Media Law Resourc centre, Inc. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.)
Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) Admission/Application Essay. Retrieved from
(Briefing a Case Harris V. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) Admission/Application Essay)
Briefing a Case Harris V. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) Admission/Application Essay.
“Briefing a Case Harris V. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977)

Case Analysis: Jones Blair Company

...? Case Analysis: Jones Blair Company Case Analysis: Jones Blair Company Case Background and Problem Jones Blair Company is a privately held corporation reported to produce and market architectural paint under the Jones•Blair brand name. Given that the industry and architectural paint coating sector is in the maturity stage, coupled with a sluggish growth in sales, the need for continued research and development efforts and required compliance to governmental regulations regarding adherence to stipulated levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Jones Blair is reflecting on the marketing strategy to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Florida v. Harris and Florida v. ardines

...? Critical Thinking Assignment: Florida v. Harris Florida v. Jardines Introduction Consistent in all global legislative systems, legal cases are initially sought out in lower and trial courts. Subsequently, the decisions are appealed and challenged in higher courts such as Supreme Court. Various concurring and dissenting opinions are revealed during the hearings of the cases and all circumstances are carefully accounted for before reaching final conclusion. References to past legal cases are very critical as situations of most of the cases resemble to those in older ones. This paper entails a detailed discussion and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The cases of Maryland v. King and Florida v. Harris

...? Critical Thinking Assignment: Maryland v. King Florida v. Harris Introduction Often, we come across legal cases where final decisions given by the superior legislative courts do not seem righteous for the greater good of our society. This mostly happens in cases involving the provisions of Fourth Amendment since they often get misjudged due to their confusing technicalities. In such scenarios, I believe that the overall circumstances must be considered in totality instead of referring to different legal provisions in isolation and verifying compliance with them. It is also vital that the final decision becomes source of benefit for the maximum number of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Case Briefing

18 Pages(4500 words)Essay

Briefing a case State v. Wells

...v. Wells Court of Appeals for Green County, Ohio. Legal History: The appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated vehicular homicide and vehicular assault in the Greene County Common Pleas Court. She was subsequently convicted and sentenced. She appealed her sentence and conviction in the Court of Appeals for Green County, Ohio. Facts: On the facts of the case, the appellant was involved in a motor car accident after running a red light. As a result of the accident, one individual was killed and another injured. As a result the appellant was charged with one count of vehicular homicide and one count of vehicular assault. The appellant maintained her innocence, but believing that she would be convicted and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay


...1. MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. 545 U.S. 913 (2005) 2. Facts: Grokster and StreamCast, the respondents of the case, distributed free software which would allow the users to share electronic files through peer-to-peer network. This software was used by the users to share music and video files that were copyrighted without authorisation. The respondents were sued by MGM for copyright infringements. It was alleged that the software was distributed intentionally by the respondents to allow users to share copyrighted works. Reproduction or distribution of copyrighted works in any form would be in violation with the copyright act. Hence, MGM sought damages while respondents claimed that they did not control or monitor the use... , the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Case Briefing

... Case briefings Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) Decided in 1969 In this case, three-law enforcement officers arrived at the home of Santa Anna in California equipped with an arrest warrant but lacked a search and seizure warrant. They asked petitioner’s wife if they enter the house and she allowed them in as they waited for the arrival of the petitioner. The police office had an arrest warrant to arrest the petitioner for robbery of a coin ship. When the petitioner arrived at his home and entered his house, the police officers served him with the arrest warrant and asked for permission to search his house. The petitioner refused but the police officer carried to search his house on the ground of the lawful arrest... . It is...
6 Pages(1500 words)Book Report/Review

Briefing a Case

...Oglesbee v Pfeil Funeral Homes Inc Number Oglesbee v Pfeil Funeral Homes Inc Facts This case involves an appellant who suffered injuries within the defendant’s premises as she was leaving at the end of a business session. The claimant was in company of an employee of the defendant who was carrying an umbrella with which they protected themselves from the rain. The claimant was walking ahead of the agent, thus her sight was not blocked by the agent from seeing her steps. She claimed that her injury from the fall was the result of a slip from an eight-inch kerb in the sidewalk for the guests. Procedure The case of Oglesbee v Pfeil Funeral Homes Inc. was...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

United States v. Jones

...United s v. Jones In the fourth amendment of US constitution, unreasonable searches and seizures against an individual are prohibited and require the judicial sanction of warrants before searches, seizures are initiated, and there must be a probable cause to effect the same (Wetterer 24). Under the amendment, searches and seizure warrants are limited depending on the information made available to the court issuing the search and seizure warrants by an officer, who swears by the same (Wetterer 78). Aspects based on the fourth amendment forms the basis for the case between United States versus Jones. In the making of court decisions involving the fourth amendment of the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Briefing a case---Near v. Minnesota

...Near v. Minnesota Near v. Minnesota  June 1931 The facts and historical/social context of the case: The Press published a story on assaults on local officials claiming that the police had links with the criminals. The Minnesota administration, therefore, made attempts to stop the Saturday Press from other publications under the state decrees (Near v. Minnesota). The state law argued that the Press caused nuisance through defamatory statements; thus, the abolishment of other publications and circulation to the public. Constitutional question(s) presented by the case: The Court had to decide if the authorizations to stop the Press were in line with the...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Admission/Application Essay on topic Briefing a case Harris v. Jones, 281 Md. 560 (1977) for FREE!

Contact Us