Declining Efficiency of Coastal Sunbelt Employees - Essay Example

They stressed that schedule flexibility must be related to workplace flexibility too. Thus, reducing a five-day workweek to a four-day one will greatly improve the wellbeing of employees, which will directly contribute to their morale and energy at the workplace.Facer II, R.L., & Wadsworth, L.L. (2010). Four-day workweeks: Current research and practice. Connecticut Law Review, 42(4), 1031-1046. Facer and Wadsworth (2010) presented their findings on Utah’s implementation of a four-day workweek for state employees.

Findings showed that decreased workweek schedules considerably lessened participants’ total commute time, thereby boosting employees’ personal time that they can use for social and household activities, or sleep. Lowering long commute times can offer concrete benefits for organizations since this research gives evidence that longer commutes result in more stress, more health problems, more absenteeism and tardiness, and lower performance. This source is useful for my proposal because it supports the benefits of a four-day workweek at individual, company, and society levels.

For individuals, they will save money and time in going to work and they can feel less work-life conflict; for companies, they can experience fewer expenses in electricity and other tools used by employees; and for society, social and environmental benefits are apparent.Chapter Ten: ReflectionFor Chapter Ten, I learned valuable resource evaluation knowledge and skills. For instance, I used to take studies for granted, meaning that I no longer evaluate their validity and reliability. From now on, I use a system in evaluating my sources.

First, I evaluate the source for its “reputation for honesty and credibility” (p.245). I examine the journals and their methods in choosing their published articles. I learned to prefer peer-reviewed over non-peer-reviewed sources. Second, I discovered that it is critical to assess the point-of-view of the organization. Every journal belongs to an organization/s, which has biases in how they see the world and analyze it. Third, I dissect the actual and hidden purposes of the article.

I try to evaluate the hidden agenda of the article, such as political and commercial purposes, which will affect their analyses and interpretations of their data. Fourth, I understand the importance of verifying the credibility of the authors. Unless they are experts in their fields or are experts in summarizing the reports of other experts, their conclusions and arguments might be weak. Fifth, I learned to analyze if the data and finings made sense as a whole. This requires giving time to digest the data and finding logic and fallacies in the findings and conclusions.

Thus, Chapter Ten prepared me to become a more critical writer and reader of academic and non-academic sources.