Comparative far Right Politics, US and Europe - Article Example

Comparative far right politics, US and Europe. Obtained http www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica apr/26/comparative-far-right-politics-us-europe This article compares politics in America and presidential elections in Europe. A party was held by the best three candidates immediately after the election’s first round. The speech was given by the third candidate, Marine Le Pen. Although she avoided talking about the present European Economic crisis, her speech was received by everyone. She had run on a Front national party ticket. In her victory speech, she talked of many things, but it was only her supporters’ praise that received a good applause. She had criticized the opinion polls for giving wrong information. She wanted to convince her supporters that she was only the right candidate for the post as the other two candidates were only fit for other big business. The major thing that she wanted to bring out was the monopoly the banks and financial systems had experienced. Marine Le Pen reminded the supporters about the collapsed government of Holland earlier that week. The collapse was based on detestation of immigrants and Islam. The article continues to bring out Wilders and Le Pen as people who joined the right parties that propelled them to victory. Economic crisis is influencing politics in many parts of the world. It is shown the many factors that influence voters during election time. These range from debts and globalization. Popular people who were considered the right candidate for a similar financial position come from nations that have well established welfare states such as Austria, Denmark or Finland. Such popular people like Pia Kjærsgaard from Denmark make promises of availing public spending and introducing immigration controls. Such measures cannot be welcomed easily in America. Americans expect to hear proposals about tax that penalize the deprived and favor the affluent. Americans are used to listening to high expending on bombs and social issues like gay marriage in election time. The Americans were awakened by the 2008 crash and the Tea Party. The working class people are no longer fooled by empty promises on social security issues. They now understand business and the role of the government. Capitalism is witnessed by even the poor as they differentiate between donated money in commerce and the associated cost when things do not work out. The Americans need to stop fearing Islam and stop focusing more on constitution of the government so as to understand factors that Europe base on when they campaign for elections. Europe base more on economic decline or growth, globalization and political stability. The importance of this current event to world politics is that it enables people to appreciate the main factors that are based on within politics. Supporters came to understand the factors Europe puts upfront: economic growth, globalization and political stability. At the same time, Americans came to hear only of proposals on tax favoring the rich, high spending on bombs and usual social issues. This makes them to stick to principles that are conservative and tend to be enduring in every aspect. If American politicians could understand the same parameters as those Europeans, public sectors will be saved from destruction. And even the corporations will aim at benefitting the voters more than the politicians. Obama, Romney skip taxpayer money for campaign obtained from: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/04/mitt-romney-public-financing-presidential-campaign-/1 This article presents this current event as one of its kind in the entire world. The author states that ever since 1976, all campaigns for the post of the president in United States of America will not use money raised by the taxpayer. The two major parties in United States of America; Republican Party as well as Democratic Party have decided to use other means of financing their nominated Presidential aspirants. Republican National Committee’s nominated candidate, Mitt Romney, is making use of private means to raise money to his campaign for presidential seat in forthcoming general election. His party, Republican National Committee, is working closely with him to see him become the next president of United States of America. He has organized for fundraising where able people give over $75,000 U.S dollars. The raised money will be subdivided into many sectors. Among them being the Republican National Committee, the four parties of state and campaign of Mitt Romney. The current president of United States of America was the first ever presidential aspirant in the history of America not to use the money of taxpayers. In 2008, when Barrack Obama was campaigning for presidency, he turned down a campaign pledge to take funding from the public. He actually managed to raise $ 750 million U.S dollars that he used for that campaign. Yet again, with the help of his party ticket, Democratic National Committee, he is making use of private means to generate funds for the presidential campaign in United States of America. President Obama is considered a man of great vision. He does not believe in failure. Thus he seems to give a deaf ear to all people who doubt his campaign efforts. For instance, he has disregarded the warnings by a number of people who tend to think that this time round private means will not be sufficient in raising campaign money for presidential campaign. As a way of example, a College lecturer in Maine, Anthony Corrado, who is a professor, is giving a word of warning that unless clear restructuring is carried out, meaningful presidential campaigns will not be possible. Even Romney’s campaign spokes person, Ryan Williams, has issued warnings to Romney concerning presidential campaigns. He has said that if Mitt Romney does not use money from taxpayers for general presidential election, it would give the Democratic National Committee together with Barrack Hussein Obama a direct automatic win. The plan of president Obama is to look f or ways of getting more than $1 billion U.S dollars. Such huge sum of money will enable him offset the economic failures his period in power experienced. Without distracting public attention from that, political failures will make his competitor, Mitt Romney, to ascend to power. Mitt Romney, on the other hand, has planned to raise around $800 million U.S dollars through private means for the present general election in America. Both Mitt Romney and president Obama will get $91.2 million for the general presidential election from public funding. Public funding will enable the aspirants to pay the conventions of politics. Presently in United States of America, it is considered a disadvantage to finance presidential elections using public funds. The importance of private funding for presidential elections in America is a clear indication to the rest of the world that political elections should protect the taxpayers money at all cost. Gender gap persists among political donors. Obtained from: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/04/women-political-donations-boxer-schakowsky-/1 This article notes gender gap in the race for presidency and campaigns as well as election donations in United States of America. Focusing on previous presidential elections, women contributed only twenty six percent to party committees, PACs and presidential candidates. In preceding campaigns, women contributions were so insignificant. They are, however, defended by Sam Bennett, the CEO of “She Should Run and Women’s Campaign Fund”. “She Should Run” is an affiliated assemblage that endeavors to expand on the size of women occupying elected seats in offices. A report from She Should run also indicates that few women are represented in Congress. Ever since 1978, representation of women in U.S. House reduced last year. There are only seventeen women in U.S. Senate and seventy nine women in U.S. House. As Bennett shows, there is a direct link between donating to politics and running for political seats. Thus women are encouraged to give to politics even if it is $5 only. Nevertheless, women are not left behind in all levels. In Congress, for example, women are better at fundraising. In 2010 presidential elections, women managed to raise close to $100,000 than men. $74,000 was contributed by women than men. Male Conservatives are fond of mocking female liberals as a high and mighty group of elites that come from progressive bastions of the regions of the coast. These regions comprise of New York, Boston, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Whereas such forms of stereotypes are usually unfair, in this case, they seem to uphold. The haul of fundraising the majority of thriving liberal super PAC in 2012, squarely came entirely from large donors that reside in New York City, Boston, Los Angeles and San Francisco. Of great importance is the fact that more women donors contributed more money to the group as compared to male counterparts. All that money was aimed at enhancing the presidential campaigns to be held this year. In general, male super PACs liberal are actually trailing far-off in the wake of women conservative groupings as far as fundraising is concerned. Findings indicate that for every ten people in super PACs that donate money for fundraising, four people only are male. As a matter of fact, the top six conservative groups in super PACs managed to raise money amounting to $105 million, and men in those groups were able to raise only $22.7 million. Three of the biggest super PACs liberals in United States of America; the Majority PAC, House Majority PAC and American Bridge that support Senate Democrats as well as House Democrats, filed reports concerning fundraising the previous week. The reports detailed the amount of money that was raised based on gender basis in the first quarter of 2012. Generally, the numbers of male donors are still depressing in respect to the number of female donors within super PACs. A democratic nominee in United States House, Bennett, discovered that in 2008, it is easier to raise money from women in Pennsylvania that is from men. All one has to do is make individual case on major issues like environment and education and you will get more money from women. Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill and Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif are examples of females in Congress that have managed to get considerable amount of money from other female. Data collected from the Center for Responsive Politics indicated that around forty six percent of $10.5 million raised by the boxer came from women’s contributions. At the same time, sixty four percent of $722,000 money received by Schakowsky was contributed by women. The two parties want to overturn the trend of 2010 presidential election of having low numbers of Congress women and elect more of them in Senate and House representatives in the country. The importance of this political event to the rest of the world is to encourage reduction of gender gap in political arena and elect more women in offices. Republican National Commitee joins Romney campaign. Obtained from: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/04/rnc-joins-romney-campaign/1 This article reveals that Mitt Romney has managed to get the support of the Republican National Committee. The party has decided to carry him throughout the election period as their preferred nominated candidate. The party agreed to synchronize their executive operations and open direct communications in Boston, Washington DC and in their teams. This comes even after Mitt Romney failed to win all the delegates in the United States of America. The efforts of the Republican National Committee are witnessed in its endeavors of joining with the earlier Massachusetts governor to raise funds together for campaigning in the next elections. The two groups have agreed to function in a synchronized manner. Even their communications and political departments have agreed to work together. This will include building a grass-root national network for efficient campaigning. The Chairman of Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus reported by a phone call that they are prepared to support the campaigns of Mitt Romney at all costs. They want to merge and Republican National Committee will set its party energy and resources to ensure that Mitt Romney wins the next presidential elections in United States of America. The presidential campaigns in United States of America for public office and modes of financing have advanced from a simpler to a costly and complex institution. Similarly, the effort of controlling the influence of funds and getting the right direction in politics and evading the political restrictions on a leader rests in the institution of the political parties. That is why Republican National Committee has decided to full join campaigns of Mitt Romney. Members of Republican National Committee party argue that the American campaign cycle is to a certain extent a product of the independent system and the undesirable price of having strong politicians who can pursue voters’ interest. Hence getting full support of the party makes presidential campaigns of Mitt Romney in United States of America. Following the massive win of mitt Romney in the five primaries of Northeast, the previous Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich has announced to begin to close his presidential campaigns. That departure of former Speaker has left two contesters only to be nominated, Ron Paul, a Texas representative and Mitt Romney. With a full support of Republican National Committee, Ron Paul will not have an opportunity of defeating Mitt Romney in the chase for more delegates. The importance of this current political event to the rest of the world politics is to encourage politicians to seek full support of their parties first before embarking on campaigns. Works Cited Camia, Catalina. Gender gap persists among political donors. Obtained from: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/04/women-political-donations-boxer-schakowsky-/1 Camia, Catalina. Obama, Romney skip taxpayer money for campaign obtained from: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/04/mitt-romney-public-financing-presidential-campaign-/1 Farago, Jason. Comparative far right politics, US and Europe. Obtained from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/apr/26/comparative-far-right-politics-us-europe Powell, Dalton. "Comparative Politics Today" A World View Tenth Edition. London: Longman Publishing, 2010. Print. Singer, Paul. Republican National Commitee joins Romney campaign. Obtained from: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/04/rnc-joins-romney-campaign/1 Sodaro, Michael. Comparative Politics: A Global Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher, 2007. Print. Read More