Download file to see previous pages...
Generally the northerners and southerners had totally conflicting outlooks and values. The south was rich in agriculture and agricultural related output while the north was more of an industrial hub. The north was also a cosmopolitan area in both religion and nationalities (Hewitt and Lawson 104). The north was not willing to tolerate slave and slavery actions of the south states and undertook measures such as starting the abolitionist movement that aimed at ending slavery across America. The south was angered by northerners’ actions and values of protecting escaping slaves and wanted to impose the rights of states to own slaves (Hewitt and Lawson 111).
Slavery among other factors made America to reach the great American tragedy since 1861, slavery was a state’s rights, and provided for in the state laws. By 1860, cracks were clear in the American society and it was no longer a homogeneous society, but instead one that had different outlooks and different values. This was vitalized by the emergence of the north and the southern divides that formed the two sides of the war (Hewitt and Lawson 173)
Economically, the use of slaves in cotton plantations by the south states and northern abolitionist movements created tensions between the south and north. Four out ten people in 1860 were slaves providing labor force to the rich agricultural south and this formed the strong foundation of the southern economy (Hewitt and Lawson 165). All southerners viewed any attempt by the federal government to control the rights of slave owners as a catastrophic threat to the southern economic system. The northern merchants benefitted from the demands of the south for shipping the cheaply produced cotton abroad and the southerners also benefitted from the imports of consumption goods by the northerners (Hewitt and Lawson 133).
Politically, the north and south read from different scripts with the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The aim and plan of this formed Confederate was to wear down the USA stronger morale and also attract the intervention of fellow European powers. This was not to happen as neither of the two worked out the way they expected. The strategy of the Union with Lincoln as the President was to come up and maintain morale through nationalism appeals after which advance to sentiments to antislavery.
The Northern states of the country were for the abolition of slavery while the Southern states, where large tracts of land had been made into agricultural plantations, wanted to retain slavery. However, while it may be true that slavery was a major contention between the Northern and the Southern states, it was definitely not the basis for civil war.
Despite being faced with death, diseases, separation from family members, and mutilation the soldiers soldiered on without any regrets or misgivings. They were prepared to lose their lives in the battlefield. So why did they fight? What sustained the war and why or how did they nerve themselves to face danger in the battle?
The historian who took twenty years to write a book on the American civil war claimed that the civil war laid the foundation of the nation and provided the platform based on which the nation could build its self-existence. Although Americans have been involved in the wars in Europe like the First World War, the civil war defined the identity and the character of the Americans.
tates, interpretations of the Constitution and particularly Slavery, the vast differences between North and South are evident, and the Civil War does seem to have been inevitable.
Essential to the causes of the American Civil War is the strong feelings Southern States had
Civil war exposes people to untold sufferings. Women and children are usually the hardest hit since they are highly vulnerable. Using secondary sources analysis and first-hand observation, results indicate that civil wars cause emotional and psychological suffering. There are also cases of physical suffering where people are maimed forever.
ng,” the controversy that goes deep to the causes of the war tells as much (Kurtz, 1985, p.130).With deep roots in the prevailing political and economic environment of the time, more so on the arrogance of sectional extremists and blundering politicians, it follows therefore
The south based its economy on agriculture. Only the wealthy and influential folks who owned plantations in the South could hire, rent or own slaves. Eli Whitney’s invention boosted cotton plantations allowing the plantation owners to utilize slave labor. The north, however, was more of an industrialized region, with more entrepreneurs.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The cause of civil war for FREE!