Download file to see previous pages...
Political scholars exhibiting interest in this aspect have highlighted that the success of the conservative party was attributable to numerous factors that favoured the party in the 20th century. This paper will offer a critical analysis of the factors that contributed to the success of the party in the 20th century.
A historical review of the party reveals that during the inter-war period, the conservative party proved to be the largest in the House of Commons. This was specifically in the period between 1918 and 1945. The party had the capacity to register majority votes as evidenced by the elections in 1921-1931 in which it emerged the second but garnered a majority vote of 8.65 million. During the 20th century, the party registered five victories and only two defeats. Interestingly, the victories were defined by massive majority votes. For example, there was a time when the party had 200 MPs margin compared to the second largest party. The success of the conservative party in the 20th century has been attributed to the proper foundation of Disraeli and Salisbury in the previous century. This historical review of the party serves to outline the party’s evident success in the 20th century. Numerous factors were critical contributors in ensuring that the party rose to its success (Pitchford 2011, p. 56).
One of the factors that contributed to the success of the conservative party was its appealing foundation defined by impressive values as well as image. The founders of the conservative party associated it with conservative’s values which served to attract the support of many people. This led to the party’s massive social support which would later prove to be highly deep rooted and cohesive enough to bind the people. Notably, the values of any political party are key determinants of its success because supporters consider the values and the projected image before they can commit to the party.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The question that arose was that of failed democracy whereby, colored races were enlisted to fight in a war that was based solely on getting freedom and justice for all yet they were discriminated by the very people they fought alongside.
Author Professor’s name Class Name Date History and Political Science: Topic II Essay After the civil war, while most of Europe was busy colonising and expanding and strengthening their borders America focussed within and tried to build up its infrastructure and reap economic harvests.
There were two national parties, the Federalist Party and the Democratic - Republican Party that dominated the political arena. The two parties competed for the various elective positions of the presidency, congress and the states. The republicans dominated after the 1800 while the federalist was dominant up to 1800 (Brands et al 273-276).
This essay discusses that Nigeria experienced ethnic, racial, religious, regional and class discrimination in the country, where the communities belonging to eastern, western and northern parts of the vast country appeared to be determined to dominate over other ethnic and regional communities in one way or the other.
Reportedly, the term “media” is defined by the Australian Oxford Dictionary as “mass communications”, especially newspapers and broadcasting, regarded collectively. More specifically, the media is made up of the mass circulation press, the cinema, radio, television and recently, the Internet.
The paper compares the political systems that are followed in Greece and Britain in the present context. In Greek, the word ‘demokratia’ means peoples’ power. According to the BBC, people’s power at that time may not mean the voice of the majority of people, but it could also mean the voice of the few people who controlled the land.
In actuality there are many similarities between these two systems. Each, on the other hand, is also distinctive from each of the others. It is these comparisons and contrasts, which will be the topic of this essay. We are taught this in the reading of books and the watching of television programs from the west.
This boils down to the very significant role of the quest for identity and the point on how the Britons came to finally accept the formal idea of Britons.
The vote of the Welsh and Scottish people for devolution though could not be blamed. We are given a picture of an empire that we can say is not dismantled but further enlarged.
This was a time when it became acceptable for people in Great Britain to protest things that they did not believe in and accept new ways of living. It was this ideology that started the Skinhead movement in Great Britain, which started out as a group of
British politics have a strong historical background that can be traced from the imperial powers to the modern times. Britain has undergone a systematic electoral reform since 1800, allowing middle-class men to vote, rural and urban workers and eventually permitting the suffrage to all males and females by the 1930s.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic British Political History for FREE!