Download file to see previous pages...
ingly, the civil war that augmented American power over the economy as well, until it competed and later beat that of the rest of countries (Glatthaar 34). Subsequent to the civil war, the nation of America had a changed sense of incorporating their states as an alternative to a split corporation of states containing their personal histories and institutions as well. Abruptly, the American nation was monogamous.
Both Southern and Northern parts of America grew along diverse lines. The North section emerged more developed while on the other hand, the Southern stayed a primarily agrarian economy. Diverse political values and social cultures emerged. As a result, there were many discrepancies on matters concerning tariffs, taxes and internal enhancements. There was also disagreement on federal rights in opposition to states rights. The discussion over the prospect of slavery was the blazing matter that directed to union interference. The quarrel resulted to secession and later to the war whereby the Western and Northern states as well as terrorists battled to maintain the union (Aaron 52). The South brawled to institute Southern sovereignty as a new state’s confederacy under its personal constitution. The agrarian South employed its slaves to work on its farms as a well as executing other duties. On the Civil war’s eve, around four million Africans as well as their descendants labored as slaves in the South. As much as, it was just a small section of the South who really contained slaves, slavery was interlaced into the Southern economy.
The individuals who possessed the most slaves earned the highest respect and got higher positions in the society. Individuals’ businesses and properties symbolized the biggest fraction of the corporate and private wealth as land and cotton values reduced and slave’s price increased. Meanwhile, the Northern states eliminated slavery slowly (Blackmon 67). There was a stable flow immigrants coming from Germany and Ireland, at
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In this essay two such interpretations will be reviewed and compared. The intent is to analyze these specifically in comparison to each other. The first reference is a book titled, “A Patriot's History of the United States: From Columbus's Great Discovery to the War on Terror,” the second is an article in the Washington Post titled “Five myths about why the South seceded.” Immediately apparent is the differences in political views of the authors, the book are written from an intensely conservative viewpoint and the article is written from a more liberal approach.
At the same time, the Northern states gradually abolished slavery. Political leaders from the south believed that each state had unalienable rights to make vital decisions without interference even for the national government. Among those rights was the right of a state to secede, or pull away from the Union of the United States.
They believed that if slavery was abolished in their states, then there was a likelihood of economic collapse. To counter this challenge to their economy, mainly from the northern states of the union, whose economies did not depend on slaves, the southern states declared themselves independent of the union and instead chose to create their own.
The American Civil War, which is also known as the War Between the States, is considered as one of the most essential historical turning points in the social, political, and economical aspect of the country. It had caused enormous social and political changes in the country that had brought new meaning to unity and the emancipation of slavery.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss and analyze the causes of the Civil War and explain why these causes could result in the war.
There are some causes of the American Civil War. The main direct ones are "the differences between the industrial North and the agricultural South and the issue of paid labor in the North versus slave labor in the South" (American History - Overview).
The south had large cotton plantation owners who wanted slavery to continue for economic reasons. The north was increasing in population and also steadily industrializing. In the initial years, the south controlled the federal government. However, with industrialization and a growing population, the north was becoming equally or more powerful.
w World, which is America, during the 1800’s are used as laborers and servants; therefore a property of the landowners, which eventually became the cause of the American Civil War (Halsey & Shores 1966-1972).
Civil unrests building up to a great extend usually results to a
Nevertheless, scientists believe that but for the slavery, this war would have never started. This is true, however there are a number of other stimuli, which should not be left unnoticed. This fact is explained by Kenneth Stampp (1992)
election laid the basis of a crisis for the whole nation because a vast majority of the Democrats in the south thought that Lincoln would not wait for long to abolish slavery in the South. Most of the white people from the South favored the secession rather than inviting such
The thirteen different states developed a loose confederation whose federal government was very weak. With the increase in problems, the Articles’ weaknesses placed a need for the leaders to unite at the Constitutional Convention
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Civil War its Causes, Events, and Relevance to Black Participation for FREE!