Same Sexual Marriage - Essay Example

Same sexual-marriage Introduction As much as opposite sex marriage nowadays is highly valued in our society, it is amazingto note that others are fighting for constitutional recognition of same sex marriage. Since the establishment of Supreme Court of Hawaii, same sex unions have been on the United States political radar. Before anchoring on the detail concerning sex marriage, it is wise to explore the real phenomenon behind this act. This is a type of marriage between two people, who bear the same biological sex. This essay will demonstrate the history of same sexual marriage, todays governmental views on same sexual marriage as well as my own opinion on the same subject matter, which has so far hit the news headline in the world. The history of same sexual marriage First, on the historical ground, it is noted that the first recoded statement of people with the same biological sex who fall in love was in U.S, the University of Minnesota. Two students by the name John Richard and his lover McConnel Micheal fell in love, and when the pleasure grew to uncontrollable situation, they matched to county district court, for a request of marriage (Burns 120). This dramatic event occurred in 1970, particularly the eighth day of the fifth month. Unfortunately, it is in tabulation that the Court- Clerk by then Mr. Nelson Gerald declined the application, on the ground that both the applicants were men. This marked the beginning of  unending journey of love. With the knowledge they had concerning Minnesota law, the two applicants went ahead to sue Nelson, who was the Clerk by then handling the case, arguing that Minnesota laws do not mention anything to do with gender. In favor of Nelson, the trial court was not impressed with the claim and so they agreed with Nelson. Nonetheless, the two lovers went ahead to seek the Supreme Courts intervention (Edwards 232). Still, since it was the first thing to be heard in America, the couple faced a rebuff again. However, the journey had been ignited. After several rejection and constitutional bans on the same sexual marriage, the Netherlands opened up. It is documented that in 1979, the Netherland country loosened up to the extent of adopting the unregistered cohabitation. Therefore, couple of the same sex could cohabitate, although not under a registered permit. This further, was forced to enter into scheme on the ground of being a civil status in rent law. Consequently, Netherlands was the first country to embrace same sexual marriage, and that they permitted the couples to apply for limited rights on the same. This wave moved across the world uncontrollably and with several debates and persuasions, Denmark decided to break the Netherlands record, by being the first nation to recognize same-sex unions (Lunn, 186). They openly passed a bill legalizing registered partners to vote. From that time on, many nations have been trying their way into this system. With evidence from Denmark, gays decided to push on for their rights to be recognized in many parts of the world. At the end of it all, after Hawaii rules that limiting marriage of the same sexual partners to be justifiable, Beahr and Richard decided to officiate their marriage in Ontario, Canada. As an example to the whole world, they decided to offer it the best. The current situation of gay marriage or the same sexual marriage is linked to the two, and that they still act as a revelation to the hidden treasure for the gays. As much as people or rather gays are enjoying the current freedom of same sexual marriage, government on its side also has a claim. The first state  to permit homosexuality in the US was Vermont. Thereafter this act spread to almost all the States in America until President Bill Clinton opposed and banned it. A stage which proved to be an eye-opener to many States. That is why there are countries who are against, and those supporting the same. The equality opponents today affirm that the same sexual relationship is unstable, as opposed to heterosexual relationships. These views are sending a negative message to the public, towards the gay people. However, the equality activists have proved to be strong since so far they allude that all people should be equal. With their un-ending push, they have managed to give out a clear picture that civil marriage should be made available to the same sex homosexuals, just in the same way as the heterosexual. This has forced almost all nations to embrace this act in the world today. Due to resistance from the religious activists, the equality movement has pressed this issue to be honored in all public offices. As a result, the government recognizes same sex marriage, which is available in the registry offices. Therefore, the gay people can now marry freely, without celebration from religious organizations. A detailed research on the same asserts that the essential thing is for them to be married, and that is why they do not care what the religious people are thinking or doing. The final decision maker is the government and therefore, since the government has so far approved their relationship, the only remaining issue is to get a partner and make it a marriage. My own opinion Basing on religious norms, same sexual marriage is not allowed. However, all that people need is freedom. One cannot benefit even if given the whole world without freedom. Furthermore, people are controlled at large with their governed or internal feelings. Denying them what they want is like imprisoning them. It is pertinent to note that people can live in their own country without expected freedom. To ensure equality, peaceful life, and freedom, it is better for the gay people be given the full freedom to make their own choice in life-the decision of marrying themselves. Perhaps, if people were not meant to be social, then denying them the freedom of socializing could be possible. People clamor for freedom, which include that of speech, worship, and property ownership among others, thus, it is not also considerate to deny them the freedom of marriage. Ultimately, if a person finds someone to marry, he or she should exercise his/ her digression since life must continue. That is why a freedom of marriage is something worth to be considered by all people and all nations. Apart from freedom, same sexual marriages should be allowed due to the need for genes variability. As much as same people cannot bear children, it is true that the sense of adoption is legalized. Once a couple, of the same sex adopts a child, then it is obvious that that child or kid is not of their two genes union-ship. Therefore, if the couples are from a family of dwarfs, or rather, they are from the lineage of dwarfism, and then there is a big chance that those kids, whom they adopt, will come in with a different type of gene. Besides, as it is obvious a marriage does not only affect the married couples alone. It is agreed that marriage is an extension of a family (Mello 134). Evidently, with accordance to the many research done, it is true that those who marry people of the same biological sex, honors family transition. Transition comes in on the side of adoption. The adopted child will not only influence the subjected family, but he or she will extend it to the entire family.In this regard, the genes transition will be seen as an extended family phenomenon. If blacks adopt a white, then the white gene will be instilled in the family systematically. Away from genes variation, same sexual marriage should be honored as a respect to the involved people. Whether a man or a woman, one will always feel he belongs in a family and that he or she can be called either someones wife or husband. A title itself carries weight. Frankly, this is what brings about respect (Rauch, 140). If the same sexual marriage was prohibited, then to some extend many could remain unmarried. This situation can be a bother to many, to the degree that their inner dignity might be triggered. That is why those who are not married will always feel the sense of denial. The denial itself pins someone down, to the extent of not expressing himself as expected. If someone feels pinned down, then to him or her, a sense of respect is the desire of the heart. Conclusion It all started as a small thing, however as time went by many got into the system. The origin of the attraction between people of the same biological sex is something that cannot be explained. However, nowadays many have been submerged in this system, and that almost all nations have comfortably embraced this system. One cannot fail to get a certain number of people in a country, who values the same sexual marriage and have gone into it. According to the message above, initially in 1970s courts tried to oppose this act. However, slowly by slowly, many nations gave it a tried. That is why, up to date, people have decided to live with the situation. Even the civil offices have embraced it since the orders are streamed from the head of state through the constitutional amenders to the all offices in a country. Following examples of others, almost all nations have embraced it. Since it is the freedom that people want, a good leader or a country that is governed with democracy will always initiate it, even if the initiators are not for it. Works Cited Burns, Kate. Gay marriage. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Print. Edwards, Jane. "Marriage Is Sacred: The Religious Rights Arguments Against gay Marriage In Australia." Culture, Health & Sexuality 9.3 (2007): 247-261. Print. Lunn, P.. "Anatomy and Theology of Marriage: Is Gay Marriage an Oxymoron?." Theology and Sexuality 4.7 (2007): 10-26. Print. Mello, Michael. Legalizing gay marriage. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2004. Print. Miller, Debra A.. Gay marriage. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2012. Print. Rauch, Jonathan. Gay marriage: why it is good for gays, good for straights, and good for America. New York: Times Books/Henry Holt and Co., 2004. Print. Read More