Download file to see previous pages...
The problem with the Act stems from the way it was passed into law. The Act was formulated forty-five days after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. Besides the short period it took to formulate, Congress was given limited time to read and debate the bill. In fact, there are fears that many members of congress did not have enough time to read the document and as such, they might have passed it into law flawed. The hasty way in which this Act was formulated and passed could have been because of fear for another terrorist attack. Even so, it could also have been used as an avenue to infuse it with undeserved provisions benefitting the government. This hastiness served to entrench the secret ways in which the government uses the Act’s allowances (Smith & Li-Ching 23).
There have been cases reported about FBI agents breaking into and searching people’s homes without notice. The violations of rights by the Patriot Act are complicated. Targets of FISA surveillance are not furnished with the contents of the court order that led to their arrest and as such, they lack the grounds to challenge wiretaps and searches done illegally. This contrasts significantly with a defendant prosecuted under the criminal investigative authority of the government who would be furnished with a copy of the court order. Proponents of the Patriot Act move that as the commander-in-chief, the president should use any means to protect the country from attacks. This argument downplays the fact that the president and the executive are not above the law and the Constitution (Smith & Li-Ching 24). The means they use to protect the country from attacks are supposed to be constrained by the constitution.
Following the subtle implications of Section 218, it is possible that some people who are thought to be against government policies or who are related to foreign powers are unfairly searched and
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
When examining the basic concept of liberty as a right in various countries, it can be seen that different perspectives are initialized, specifically in relation to the executive powers which exist. While the ideology of liberty is noted as a main power within society, there are questions of the protection of liberty, what this means and what powers should be demonstrated.
As such, it can be seen that the United States’ intervention in Libya was an attempt to protect the human rights of the people there. United Nations recognised the necessity of protecting human rights in Libya and gave backing to the concept of R2P in the year 2005 which led to the military intervention in Libya to protect the people from atrocity crimes which began in 2011.
Thus, International human rights organizations have the tasks of ensuring that freedom and justice is afforded to all people in the world. Since most governments are known to violate the rights and freedoms of their citizens, they are normally put to task by the Human rights Organizations, who acts as the watchdogs for the basic rights and freedoms of the citizens.
Of course, there are many countries with a severe level of poverty. Unfortunately, poor countries are lacking of proper knowledge in the issues of management and politics and they are lacking of fair opportunities for further development. The main disadvantage is that people do not “govern themselves” poorly, but are very poorly governed (Pogge, 2005).
Moreover, the legislature is perhaps “the most vulnerable target” of political corruption.2 When the legislation is manipulated, the consequences are far reaching, spilling over into other key administrative structures.3 This paper
States have obligated upon themselves these rules and they serve to limit the autonomy of states to do something toward their whole population: married persons and the unmarried, men as well as women, citizen as well as non-citizen,
concerns stem from the inherently diverse and multicultural nature of the contemporary world and critics have questioned if the rights can possibly be all inclusive given the differences. This has motivated some schools of thought to argue that the human rights concept is an
10 Pages(2500 words)Term Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Theories of Human Rights for FREE!