When presidents are sworn into office, they take up the spirit of the entire country and promise to uphold it to every degree that they find to be humanly possible. Because of this, world leaders have taken several decisions that have been represented as being to the interest of…
Download file to see previous pages...
The missile placement was being done as a means of deterring future invasion from enemies like United States. The result of Soviet Union’s decision was what became known as the Cuban Missile Crisis, which was influenced by different points of views held by leaders of the three countries involved. In this paper, the perspectives of the three countries are reviewed, as well as the result of the agreement reached between the countries. The review is done exclusively by using BBC’s documentary on the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.
From the video, there are strategic and psychological analyses that the EX COMM makes to President JFK that come to represent the larger U.S perspective or view point of the Cuban Missile Crisis. From a strategic analysis point of view, the United States perceived that the Soviet Union had a motive of balancing forces to their favor so that the country would be freer to challenge the interests of the United States. But to make this possible, the Soviet Union had to have a capacitated force behind its remaining 50 ballistic missiles, which could range only to hit European countries. By placing the missiles in Cuba, the Soviet could have a closer range to target and attack the U.S. Indeed another strategic analysis that is perceived from the United States point of view was that the Soviet Union wanted to put the credibility of the United States into doubt by placing missiles at a position that can best be referred to as the backyard of the United States without the United States knowing of it. Then from a psychological analysis, there was a U.S held point of view that the Soviet leader Khrushchev perceived JFK as a weak leader from his inability to have firm positions against the Soviet leader in their 1961 summit. But seeing herself as the superpower of world, the US would not allow its voted leader to be taken for a weak leader who could not react to the missile laying in Cuba.
The Soviet Union also had a perspective of the Cuban
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Cuban Missile Crisis Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1628640-cuban-missile-crisis
(Cuban Missile Crisis Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Cuban Missile Crisis Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1628640-cuban-missile-crisis.
Parkland, an American historical dramatized film, tries to recount the events that took place following the assassination of Kennedy. According to the movies, it is clear that assignation was carried out by one, Oswald. Bugliosi (27) emphasizes on the fact the Lee Harvey Oswald carried out the assassination.
Luckily, the nuclear weapons are not yet functional, and Kennedy and his advisers must find a way on removing the weapons out of Cuba - whether through sincere negotiations or through their weapons. At first, diplomatic negotiations do not succeed as the Russians hide the truth and threaten Kennedy.
It was during the breakfast on October 16th that President Kennedy acquired information from the Intelligence bureau about Soviet Unions secret missile base in Cuba. Soviet foreign minister Andrei Gromyko met the President Kennedy and he denied any kind of threat caused by the missile base to the U.S.
La ltima cena is also a slavery film set at the end of the eighteenth century. It is described as a satire about hypocrisy and a celebration of the Afro-Cuban legacy, " - - - undoubtedly the other masterpiece [along with Memorias del subdesarrollo] of Alea's."2 It is a subversive allegory of the religious hypocrisy of plantation owners especially with their ideas of abolitionism.
The film focuses on his life when he served under two presidents between the years of 1961 to 1968, when he served under the regimes of John F Kennedy and Lyndon B Johnson. Another depiction is that of McNamara’s role in
He states these lessons from the experiences he had during his participation and involvement during the Second World War and the Vietnam War. The movie scrutinizes not only McNamara’s actions and decisions throughout the Vietnam
Michael Scott is not respectful to the other employees that work for the company. He expresses his authority by bossing other people in the room while stepping on the table. He does not listen or accord any respect to the opinions of his co-workers. Michael Scott also switches
The documentary is the account of what Mr. and Mrs. Stone experienced in Cuba between the months of June and October 1969.
Lillian Guerra’s story on the documentary focuses on the radicalization of Cuban politics that was happening since the end of WWII. It was
3 Pages(750 words)Movie Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Movie Review on topic Cuban Missile Crisis for FREE!